本文選題：檢察機(jī)關(guān) + 特別　； 參考：《人民檢察》2012年19期

【摘要】：正修改后刑訴法第二百八十條第一款規(guī)定:依照刑法規(guī)定應(yīng)當(dāng)追繳犯罪嫌疑人、被告人違法所得及其他涉案財(cái)產(chǎn)的,人民檢察院可以向人民法院提出沒收違法所得的申請(qǐng)。據(jù)此,修改后刑訴法在特別沒收程序中,對(duì)是否啟動(dòng)沒收財(cái)產(chǎn)的申請(qǐng),賦予了檢察機(jī)關(guān)裁量權(quán)。因此,檢察機(jī)關(guān)如何正確行使裁量權(quán),對(duì)貫徹實(shí)施修改后刑訴法所規(guī)定的沒收程序至關(guān)重要,其中,沒收程序申請(qǐng)的選擇成為檢察機(jī)關(guān)考量的首要問題。但是,目前,尚未對(duì)此問題開展研究,對(duì)此,筆者認(rèn)為,探討檢察機(jī)
[Abstract]:The first paragraph of Article 280 of the revised Criminal procedure Law stipulates that, in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Law, criminal suspects, the illegal proceeds of the accused and other property involved in the case shall be recovered, and the people's Procuratorate may file an application to the people's court for confiscation of the illegal proceeds. Accordingly, in the special confiscation procedure, the amended Criminal procedure Law gives the procuratorial organ discretion to apply for the confiscation of property. Therefore, how to correctly exercise the discretion of the procuratorial organ is of great importance to the implementation of the confiscation procedure stipulated in the revised Criminal procedure Law, among which, the choice of the application for the confiscation procedure has become the most important issue for the procuratorial organ to consider. However, at present, no research has been carried out on this issue. In view of this, the author believes that the discussion of the procuratorial machine
【作者單位】： 黑龍江省遜克縣人民檢察院;
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2;D926.3
，

本文編號(hào)：2057822