本文選題：檢察權(quán) + 法律監(jiān)督　； 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文研究中外檢察權(quán)是從歷史的角度出發(fā),追本溯源、由古即今,從檢察權(quán)的起源與發(fā)展著手研究其歷史、現(xiàn)狀和未來,從封建時(shí)期“檢察權(quán)”的起源一直到近現(xiàn)代檢察權(quán)的發(fā)展,探討大陸法系、英美法系、社會(huì)主義法系之間檢察權(quán)的種種區(qū)別與聯(lián)系,思考古代御史制度及法律文化對(duì)現(xiàn)代檢察權(quán)的指導(dǎo)意義,發(fā)現(xiàn)國外檢察權(quán)值得借鑒的地方,從而為我國未來檢察權(quán)的構(gòu)建和發(fā)展提供建議。 不忘記基本的歷史聯(lián)系,通過歷史的比較的方法是必要且可行的研究方法,研究該問題應(yīng)當(dāng)觀察檢察權(quán)的歷史起源、發(fā)展歷程以及在不同界域的區(qū)別與聯(lián)系,才能得出檢察權(quán)產(chǎn)生的原因,通過追本溯源、抽絲剝繭,方能深入了解問題背后的真諦,從而明確檢察權(quán)的未來發(fā)展軌跡并提出可行的指導(dǎo)建議。 以檢察權(quán)為重心的我國現(xiàn)當(dāng)代檢察制度脫胎于古代御史制度,吸收了大陸法系檢察制度的部分精華,借鑒了前蘇聯(lián)檢察制度并吸納了列寧法律監(jiān)督思想,歷經(jīng)了新民主主義革命時(shí)期的探索與實(shí)踐,新中國成立后經(jīng)過六十多年發(fā)展變化形成。只有通過立足于我國獨(dú)特的政治制度和文化傳統(tǒng),比較考察檢察權(quán)的歷史源頭和演進(jìn)歷程,才能更準(zhǔn)確地定位我國的檢察權(quán),為我國檢察權(quán)的構(gòu)建提出更具改革性的建議。 本文比較研究了檢察權(quán)的中外理論基礎(chǔ),同時(shí)選取作為檢察權(quán)的重要權(quán)能之一的刑事職權(quán),從現(xiàn)實(shí)意義上比較了不同界域檢察權(quán)的刑事職權(quán),文章力圖通過以歷史的、比較的方法研究檢察權(quán),目的是反思我國檢察權(quán)的現(xiàn)狀,從而為我國檢察權(quán)的改進(jìn)提供可行建議,加強(qiáng)檢察權(quán)在刑事訴訟律制度中的作用,推進(jìn)依法治國的重要進(jìn)程,追求社會(huì)公平和國家正義。
[Abstract]:This article studies the procuratorial power in China and abroad from the historical point of view, tracing back to the source, starting with the origin and development of the procuratorial power from ancient to present, and studying its history, present situation and future. From the origin of "procuratorial power" in feudal period to the development of procuratorial power in modern times, this paper probes into the differences and connections of procuratorial power between civil law system, common law system and socialist law system. This paper considers the guiding significance of ancient imperial history system and legal culture to modern procuratorial power, and finds out that foreign procuratorial power is worthy of reference, thus providing suggestions for the construction and development of procuratorial power in the future of our country. Bearing in mind the basic historical links, the method of historical comparison is a necessary and feasible method of research, and the study of this issue should observe the historical origin, the course of development and the differences and connections in different boundaries of procuratorial power, In order to get the reasons of procuratorial power, through tracing back to the source, pulling the cocoon, we can deeply understand the true meaning of the problem, and then make clear the future development track of the procuratorial power and put forward feasible guidance suggestions. The modern and contemporary procuratorial system, which focuses on procuratorial power, was born out of the ancient imperial history system, absorbed part of the essence of the procuratorial system of the continental law system, borrowed from the former Soviet prosecutorial system and absorbed Lenin's thought of legal supervision. After the exploration and practice in the period of the new democratic revolution, the new China was formed after more than 60 years of development and change. Only by comparing and investigating the historical origin and evolution of procuratorial power based on our unique political system and cultural tradition can we more accurately locate the procuratorial power in our country and put forward more reforming suggestions for the construction of procuratorial power in our country. This paper compares the theoretical basis of procuratorial power between China and foreign countries, and selects criminal authority, which is one of the important powers of procuratorial power, to compare the criminal authority of procuratorial power in different areas in reality. The purpose of the comparative study of procuratorial power is to reflect on the present situation of procuratorial power in our country, so as to provide feasible suggestions for the improvement of procuratorial power in China, to strengthen the role of procuratorial power in the criminal procedure law system, and to promote the important process of governing the country according to law. The pursuit of social justice and national justice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D926.3;D916.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 王建國;;列寧檢察權(quán)屬性定位理論及其當(dāng)代價(jià)值[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2012年02期

2 石少俠,郭立新;列寧的法律監(jiān)督思想與中國檢察制度[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2003年06期

3 范登峰;;比較法視閾下的公訴權(quán)司法審查制度改革[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)輯刊;2007年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 樊崇義 劉濤;[N];檢察日報(bào);2003年

，

本文編號(hào)：1932349