本文選題：司法審判 + 公眾輿論監(jiān)督��； 參考：《湘潭大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：當今中國，是關注司法的時代—其本質(zhì)是呼喚司法公信力的時代，司法公信力的樹立需要公眾的認同，司法審判需要善意公正的輿論環(huán)境。但縱觀司法實踐，法院與公眾輿論監(jiān)督的關系卻陷入了怪圈，面對公眾輿論尤其是負面輿論，法院缺乏良好的應對機制，以至于在一些焦點案件中處于被動。司法審判與公眾輿論監(jiān)督產(chǎn)生沖突的原因有憲政方面的原因，也有評價基礎上的原因，更重要的是司法審判離公眾的司法需求還相差甚遠。 盡管司法審判與公眾輿論監(jiān)督存在沖突，公眾輿論也存在自身缺陷，但應當看到的是，公眾輿論對于司法審判有著積極的價值，公眾輿論監(jiān)督是司法公開化的客觀需要，對于司法民主化進程起著促進作用，正是在公眾輿論監(jiān)督下，，促進了司法裁判法律效果與社會效果的統(tǒng)一。在正確認識與公眾輿論監(jiān)督的關系基礎上，人民法院需要采取新的思路、措施促進二者關系的平衡，一是創(chuàng)新司法審判，實現(xiàn)與公眾的互信，如了解當事人與社會大眾的心理，滿足公眾司法需求，使司法具有親民性。二是塑造合理的公眾認同理念，實現(xiàn)個案公正與整體正義的平衡，實現(xiàn)裁判內(nèi)容形式合理和實質(zhì)合理的統(tǒng)一，實現(xiàn)裁判法律效果與社會效果的統(tǒng)一。三是實現(xiàn)與媒體的良性互動，應以寬容之心看待媒體監(jiān)督，建立對焦點案件的釋明機制，與媒體積極合作打造司法正面形象。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, China is an era of paying close attention to the administration of justice, whose essence is to call for the judicial credibility. The establishment of the judicial credibility needs the public's approval, and the judicial trial needs the public opinion environment of goodwill and justice. However, throughout the judicial practice, the relationship between the court and the supervision of public opinion has fallen into a strange circle. In the face of public opinion, especially negative public opinion, the court lacks a good coping mechanism, so it is passive in some focus cases. The causes of conflict between judicial trial and public opinion supervision are constitutional reasons, and there are also reasons based on evaluation. More importantly, the judicial trial is far from the judicial needs of the public. Although there are conflicts between judicial trial and supervision of public opinion, public opinion also has its own defects, but it should be seen that public opinion has positive value for judicial trial, and supervision of public opinion is the objective need of judicial openness. It is under the supervision of public opinion that it promotes the unification of the legal effect and the social effect of the judicial decision. On the basis of a correct understanding of the relationship with public opinion supervision, the people's courts need to adopt new ideas and measures to promote the balance between the two. The first is to innovate judicial trials and realize mutual trust with the public, such as understanding the psychology of the parties and the public. To meet the judicial needs of the public, so that the judiciary has a pro-people nature. The second is to create a reasonable public identity concept, to achieve the balance between the justice of individual cases and the overall justice, to realize the unity of reasonable content and reasonable substance, and to realize the unity of the legal effect and the social effect of the adjudication. Third, to realize the positive interaction with the media, we should treat the media supervision with a tolerant heart, establish the explanation mechanism of the focus cases, and actively cooperate with the media to create the positive image of the judicature.
【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 孔祥俊;論法律效果與社會效果的統(tǒng)一 一項基本司法政策的法理分析[J];法律適用;2005年01期

2 郭丹丹;;淺析司法權與輿論監(jiān)督的良性互動[J];法制與社會;2009年30期

3 顧培東;論對司法的傳媒監(jiān)督[J];法學研究;1999年06期

4 高一飛;;司法與媒體:復雜而簡單的關系[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會科學(漢文版);2006年02期

5 羅干;;政法機關在構建和諧社會中擔負重大歷史使命和政治責任[J];求是;2007年03期

6 呂伯濤;;論人民法官的社會職責[J];人民司法;2005年06期

7 錢鋒;;網(wǎng)絡輿論環(huán)境下司法公正的實現(xiàn)[J];人民司法;2009年19期

8 冀祥德;;民憤的正讀——杜培武、佘祥林等錯案的司法性反思[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2006年01期

9 吳秋余;;對“媒介審判”現(xiàn)象的分析[J];新聞戰(zhàn)線;2007年05期

10 李詠勝;;新聞與法淺論——“夾江打假案”回眸與反思[J];四川理工學院學報(社會科學版);2007年03期

相關碩士學位論文 前4條

1 李仲俊;網(wǎng)絡輿論與司法公正的沖突與平衡[D];江西師范大學;2010年

2 蔣劍華;輿論監(jiān)督與司法獨立[D];吉林大學;2006年

3 蔡虹;新聞輿論監(jiān)督與司法公正的沖突和平衡[D];南京師范大學;2006年

4 周海波;論司法獨立與輿論監(jiān)督的沖突和平衡[D];蘭州大學;2009年

本文編號：1897032