本文選題：架構(gòu) + 司法考試�。� 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：改革開放以來(lái),尤其是黨的十五大提出依法治國(guó)、建設(shè)社會(huì)主義法治國(guó)家方略后,法律在我國(guó)社會(huì)生活中的作用越來(lái)越重要,但“各自為政、自我經(jīng)營(yíng)”的法律職業(yè)準(zhǔn)入條件使法律職業(yè)者專業(yè)化程度普遍偏低,整體素質(zhì)不高,嚴(yán)重制約著國(guó)家民主法制建設(shè)的進(jìn)程。故此,2001年6月30日,九屆全國(guó)人大常委會(huì)二十二次會(huì)議審議通過(guò)《中華人民共和國(guó)法官法修正案》和《中華人民共和國(guó)檢察官法修正案》,規(guī)定初任法官、初任檢察官實(shí)行全國(guó)統(tǒng)一司法考試制度。隨即最高人民法院、最高人民檢察院、司法部聯(lián)合發(fā)布公告,明確指出2001年初任法官、檢察官考試和律師資格考試都不再單獨(dú)進(jìn)行,將同時(shí)納入2002年國(guó)家舉辦的首次全國(guó)統(tǒng)一司法考試①。自此我國(guó)統(tǒng)一司法考試制度正式拉開大幕。 時(shí)致今日,該制度已實(shí)施了10個(gè)年頭。隨著我國(guó)法治社會(huì)建設(shè)的逐步深入,其部分設(shè)置已不能很好的適應(yīng)我國(guó)法制建設(shè)的整體需求,運(yùn)行過(guò)程中暴露出的問(wèn)題引起了法學(xué)理論界和司法實(shí)務(wù)部門廣泛地關(guān)注與爭(zhēng)論：我國(guó)法律職業(yè)到底需要一個(gè)什么樣的司法考試制度?怎樣設(shè)計(jì)才能使其每一項(xiàng)具體的制度更加科學(xué)?如何改革才能使我國(guó)司法考試制度與其它相關(guān)制度更協(xié)調(diào)?等等。 本文以提高我國(guó)法律職業(yè)者綜合素質(zhì)為出發(fā)點(diǎn)和落腳點(diǎn),試圖對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行統(tǒng)一司法考試制度的架構(gòu)做一梳理,明確利弊,并提出相應(yīng)的改革和完善措施,以期對(duì)尚在摸索中的我國(guó)司法考試制度和處于瓶頸期的司法體制改革有所助益。 文本除引論和后記(致謝)外,共四個(gè)部分,3萬(wàn)余字。 第一部分司法考試制度綜述,該部分共分四個(gè)小節(jié),第一小節(jié)架構(gòu)釋義,分別從名詞和動(dòng)詞的角度對(duì)“架構(gòu)”做了解釋,并介紹了該詞在學(xué)術(shù)理論界的運(yùn)用情況。二、三小節(jié)以當(dāng)今世界各國(guó)法律職業(yè)資格考試為著眼點(diǎn),歸納總結(jié)了司法考試制度的基本性質(zhì)和基本模式,第四小節(jié)在前兩小節(jié)的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)法制良好國(guó)家的司法考試情況做了介紹,主要包括大陸法系的德國(guó)、法國(guó)、韓國(guó)、日本和普通法系的英國(guó)、美國(guó)。 第二部分我國(guó)司法考試制度的歷史演變,該部分首先探討了我國(guó)近代司法考試制度產(chǎn)生的動(dòng)因,然后對(duì)我國(guó)司法考試的土壤進(jìn)行了挖掘,分別概述了清末、共和初年、北洋政府、民國(guó)和建國(guó)后至統(tǒng)一司法考試實(shí)施前這五個(gè)時(shí)期我國(guó)的司法考試情況,其中著重介紹了改革開放后我國(guó)律師資格考試的實(shí)施情況。 第三部分我國(guó)現(xiàn)行司法考試的制度框架,該部分在參照其他學(xué)者相關(guān)論述的基礎(chǔ)上,以定性分析的方法對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行司法考試的制度框架從“架構(gòu)”的名詞性角度進(jìn)行了考察,重新界定了我國(guó)現(xiàn)行司法考試制度的性質(zhì)、模式、價(jià)值和目標(biāo),以求撥亂反正之效。 第四部分我國(guó)現(xiàn)行司法考試制度的運(yùn)行機(jī)制,該部分在立足我國(guó)司法考試土壤、借鑒他國(guó)先進(jìn)司法考試經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上,以前述架構(gòu)釋義為統(tǒng)領(lǐng),采用比照的寫法,對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行司法考試制度的優(yōu)劣之處進(jìn)行了肯定和批判,并提出了相應(yīng)的改革與完善措施。內(nèi)容主要包括我國(guó)現(xiàn)行司法考試制度的管理機(jī)制、報(bào)名資格、考卷內(nèi)容、考試過(guò)程、考試時(shí)間和及格分?jǐn)?shù)線等六個(gè)方面。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening - up , especially the 15th National Congress of the Communist Party of China has put forward the rule of law in accordance with the law , the role of the law in the social life of our country is more and more important after the establishment of the socialist country of law country . The Supreme People ' s Court , the Supreme People ' s Procuratorate and the Ministry of Justice jointly issued a public announcement .

Today , the system has been implemented for 10 years . With the gradual deepening of the construction of the rule of law society in our country , the partial setting of the system has not been well adapted to the overall demand of the legal construction of our country . The problems exposed in the course of operation have caused extensive attention and debate in the legal theory and the judicial practice . How to design the system to make every concrete system more scientific ? How to reform can make our judicial examination system more coordinated with other relevant systems ?

In order to improve the comprehensive quality of the legal profession in our country as the starting point and the landing point , this paper attempts to comb the structure of the current unified judicial examination system in our country , make clear the pros and cons , and put forward the corresponding reform and improvement measures , in order to benefit the judicial examination system and the reform of the judicial system in the bottleneck period .

There are four parts , more than 30,000 words , in addition to quotations and postmarks ( thanks ) .

The first part of the judicial examination system is summarized , the part is divided into four sub - sections , the first sub - section structure is defined , the article explains the " structure " from the angle of the noun and the verb respectively , and introduces the basic property and basic mode of the judicial examination system . The fourth subsection introduces the judicial examination of the good country in the world on the basis of the former two sections , mainly including the British and the United States of Germany , France , Korea , Japan and the common law system of the civil law system .

In the second part , the historical evolution of China ' s judicial examination system is discussed . First , the motivation of the system of judicial examination in China is discussed , and then the soil of our country ' s judicial examination is excavated , and the judicial examination of our country after the implementation of the unified judicial examination before the implementation of the unified judicial examination in the end of the Qing Dynasty , the Republic of China , the North American Government , the Republic of China and the People ' s Republic of China has been described . The implementation of the qualification examination of our country after the reform and opening up is emphatically introduced .

In the third part , the system framework of the current judicial examination in our country , based on the discussion of other scholars , makes an investigation on the institutional framework of the current judicial examination in our country from the perspective of the " schema " , and redefines the nature , mode , value and goal of the current judicial examination system in our country .

The fourth part is the operation mechanism of the current judicial examination system in our country , which is based on the experience of the advanced judicial examination of the country . Based on the experience of the advanced judicial examination of other countries , the author affirms and critiques the advantages and disadvantages of the current judicial examination system in our country , and puts forward the corresponding reform and perfecting measures .

【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926.15

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 白媛;法官職業(yè)道德探析[D];齊齊哈爾大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1890379