本文選題：法院調(diào)解 + 糾紛解決�。� 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：法院調(diào)解是被譽(yù)為“東方經(jīng)驗(yàn)”的我國(guó)民事訴訟制度的一大特色。法院調(diào)解與判決同為審判機(jī)關(guān)處理糾紛的兩列軌道，，與判決的剛性不同的是調(diào)解更趨溫和，以當(dāng)事人的自由意志為主導(dǎo)，內(nèi)含于法院調(diào)解中的司法權(quán)幾乎不帶有強(qiáng)制性的色彩。法院調(diào)解還使當(dāng)事人充分參與到了解決糾紛的過程中，有助于消解雙方當(dāng)事人緊張的關(guān)系，有效地避免雙方當(dāng)事人之間因非贏即輸?shù)呐袥Q而導(dǎo)致的關(guān)系破裂甚至“二次沖突”。盡管法院調(diào)解制度有很多優(yōu)點(diǎn)，但是法院調(diào)解由于制度不夠成熟，存在的問題也很多，本文即先介紹法院調(diào)解的基本情況，然后提出一些完善建議。 本文分為五個(gè)部分，分別從我國(guó)法院調(diào)解制度概述、法院調(diào)解相關(guān)制度之歷史考察、法院調(diào)解制度存在的問題、各地法院的探索、法院調(diào)解制度的重構(gòu)五個(gè)方面進(jìn)行論述。 第一部分重新界定了法院調(diào)解的概念，介紹了一些代表性國(guó)家和地區(qū)的調(diào)解制度，并進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)單的比較研究，然后對(duì)我國(guó)法院調(diào)解的性質(zhì)、結(jié)構(gòu)要素和價(jià)值選擇進(jìn)行了分析。第二部分從我國(guó)法院調(diào)解的歷史沿革上，分析我國(guó)法院調(diào)解的來龍去脈，并就具有代表性的地區(qū)的調(diào)解制度進(jìn)行介紹，為法院調(diào)解在本土資源的發(fā)展提供參考。第三部分指出了現(xiàn)今我國(guó)法院調(diào)解制度存在的一些問題。法律規(guī)定的內(nèi)容與實(shí)踐得出的結(jié)論不符，法院調(diào)解的規(guī)定大多是一些原則性的問題，具體包括事實(shí)清楚、分清是非”原則存在爭(zhēng)議、“調(diào)審合一”的訴訟模式存在嚴(yán)重弊端、“自愿原則”常被曲解三個(gè)方面，在具體操作中容易被曲解。第四部分是對(duì)我國(guó)一些地方對(duì)法院調(diào)解探索成果的介紹。法院調(diào)解的自愿性決定了對(duì)程序性要求的不嚴(yán)格，為了尋找更適合我國(guó)國(guó)情的法院調(diào)解，各地方自主發(fā)揮能動(dòng)性，在實(shí)踐中探索完善方法。第五部分是對(duì)我國(guó)法院調(diào)解制度的一些完善建議。從原則性規(guī)定到具體程序的完善都做出了一些建議。筆者借本文對(duì)訴訟調(diào)解制度的探討，希望能為日后的理論和實(shí)務(wù)研究提供可靠的參考。
[Abstract]:Court mediation is one of the characteristics of civil litigation system in China, which is praised as "oriental experience". The court mediation and judgment are the two tracks for the judicial organs to deal with disputes. What is different from the rigidity of the judgment is that the mediation tends to be more moderate, which is dominated by the free will of the parties, and the judicial power contained in the court mediation has almost no mandatory color. Court mediation also enables the parties to participate fully in the process of resolving disputes, helps to resolve the tense relations between the two parties, and effectively avoids the breakdown of relations or even "secondary conflicts" between the two parties due to either winning or losing judgment. Although the court mediation system has many advantages, but the court mediation system is not mature, there are many problems, this paper first introduces the basic situation of court mediation, then puts forward some suggestions. This article is divided into five parts, respectively from our country court mediation system overview, court mediation related system of historical investigation, court mediation system problems, local courts exploration, court mediation system reconstruction five aspects are discussed. The first part redefines the concept of court mediation, introduces the mediation system of some representative countries and regions, and makes a simple comparative study, and then analyzes the nature, structural elements and value choice of court mediation in our country. The second part analyzes the history of court mediation in our country, and introduces the mediation system in representative areas, which provides a reference for the development of court mediation in the local resources. The third part points out some problems existing in China's court mediation system. The contents of the legal provisions are not consistent with the conclusions reached in practice. The provisions of court mediation are mostly principled issues, including clear facts, dispute over the principle of distinguishing between right and wrong, and serious defects in the litigation mode of "unity of trial and order". Voluntary principle is often misinterpreted in three aspects, which is easy to be misinterpreted in concrete operation. The fourth part is to some places of our country to the court mediation exploration achievement. The voluntary nature of court mediation determines that the procedural requirements are not strict. In order to find the court mediation which is more suitable for the national conditions of our country, all localities play their own initiative and explore the perfect methods in practice. The fifth part is to our country court mediation system some perfect suggestion. From the principle stipulation to the concrete procedure consummation has made some suggestions. The author hopes to provide a reliable reference for the theoretical and practical research in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 范愉;有關(guān)調(diào)解法制定的若干問題(上)[J];中國(guó)司法;2005年10期

2 李喜蓮;;法院調(diào)解優(yōu)先的冷思考[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2010年02期

3 潘度文;我國(guó)訴訟調(diào)解制度的反思與完善[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1998年06期

4 李傲,夏軍;試論我國(guó)行政補(bǔ)償制度[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1997年01期

5 張艷斐;高翔;;日本法院附設(shè)調(diào)停制度與我國(guó)法院調(diào)解制度的比較研究[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年02期

6 閆廣濤;;完善我國(guó)法院調(diào)解制度的構(gòu)想[J];黃河科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年02期

7 李浩;調(diào)解的比較優(yōu)勢(shì)與法院調(diào)解制度的改革[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

8 范毅強(qiáng);;論法院調(diào)解的結(jié)構(gòu)要素[J];學(xué)海;2008年02期

9 胡滄澤;唐代御史臺(tái)司法審判權(quán)的獲得[J];廈門大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1989年03期

10 安群;對(duì)訴訟調(diào)解性質(zhì)的理性思考[J];中共中央黨校學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張晨;委托調(diào)解制度研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2011年

本文編號(hào)：1862268