本文選題：司法裁判 + 民意��； 參考：《太原科技大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：一般認(rèn)為,民主國家的法律本就是民意的體現(xiàn),司法部門遵守經(jīng)民主程序所制定的法律進(jìn)行裁決,就是執(zhí)行民意。依此理解,在司法與民意二者之間不應(yīng)當(dāng)存在沖突�？墒请S著民眾法律意識(shí)的提高和法律職業(yè)化的深入,實(shí)際生活中的司法與民意已經(jīng)凸顯出了其緊張關(guān)系。如近年的邱興華案、許霆案、鄧玉嬌等典型案件,民意已成為司法裁判必須認(rèn)真考量的重要因素之一。尤其是新興媒體互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的興起,使得法院審判居于全新的信息環(huán)境之中,司法隨時(shí)要面臨更快捷、更狂熱的網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿論壓力。民意作為一種社會(huì)監(jiān)督力量,利于法院公正審判的實(shí)現(xiàn)。關(guān)注民意,正視其存在和影響,有助于判決獲得更廣泛的正當(dāng)化支持。既然司法不可能與民意完全隔離,那么以積極的態(tài)度尋找一條使司法與民意保持良性互動(dòng)的路徑,便成為一個(gè)同時(shí)具有理論意義與現(xiàn)實(shí)意義的課題。民意在一個(gè)程序化的建構(gòu)中,以合理、有效的方式參與到司法中,民眾以理性的視角審視司法,民意和司法在更大程度上保持一致,最終實(shí)現(xiàn)司法權(quán)威和兩個(gè)效果的共贏。 本文首先由案例形式引出我國目前民意與司法的緊張關(guān)系,介紹了學(xué)界有關(guān)研究現(xiàn)狀。通過對輿論、輿情等相似概念的了解,得出了筆者自己的觀點(diǎn),民意可以理解為民眾針對法律事件,基于其自身倫理觀、價(jià)值觀以及知識(shí)結(jié)構(gòu)所形成的基本看法或意愿。通過比較中國與英美等國家對待民意所持的不同態(tài)度及不同做法,同時(shí)對我國民意與司法裁判呈現(xiàn)的現(xiàn)狀、成因歸納并分析的基礎(chǔ)上,回答民意為何要進(jìn)入司法的問題,具有理論依據(jù)和現(xiàn)實(shí)的依托,在民意作為司法裁判基礎(chǔ)的正當(dāng)性得到認(rèn)同下,進(jìn)而就民意如何合理、合法地進(jìn)入司法的具體路徑進(jìn)行了簡單探討,靠近民意的同時(shí)也要堅(jiān)持司法的獨(dú)立性,包括法律信仰的培育、對媒體的適度規(guī)范以及人民陪審員制度的優(yōu)勢發(fā)揮等,探尋二者的相處平衡。當(dāng)民意能夠通過一個(gè)合理、有效的方式參與到司法中來,人們將會(huì)以更加理性的視角來重新審視司法,民意和司法兩者也將能在更大程度上保持一致。
[Abstract]:It is generally believed that the laws of a democratic country are the embodiment of public opinion, and that the administration of justice to abide by the laws made by democratic procedures is to enforce public opinion. According to this understanding, there should be no conflict between justice and public opinion. However, with the improvement of people's legal consciousness and the deepening of legal professionalization, the tense relationship between judicial and public opinion has been highlighted in actual life. In recent years, such typical cases as Qiu Xinghua case, Xu Ting case and Deng Yujiao case, public opinion has become one of the important factors that must be carefully considered in judicial decisions. Especially the rise of the new media Internet makes the court adjudication in a new information environment and the judiciary will face faster and more fanatical pressure of public opinion on the network at any time. Public opinion, as a social supervision force, is conducive to the realization of a fair trial by the court. Paying attention to public opinion and facing up to its existence and influence will help to obtain wider legitimacy support. Since justice cannot be completely isolated from public opinion, it becomes a topic of both theoretical and practical significance to look for a way to make the judicial and public opinion interact with each other in a positive manner. Public opinion in a procedural construction, in a reasonable and effective way to participate in the administration of justice, the public from a rational perspective to examine the judiciary, public opinion and the judiciary to a greater extent consistent, and ultimately achieve the judicial authority and the two effects of win-win. Firstly, this paper introduces the tense relationship between public opinion and judicature in China, and introduces the current situation of academic research. Through the understanding of similar concepts such as public opinion and public opinion, this paper draws the author's own point of view. Public opinion can be understood as the basic view or will formed by the public in view of legal events, based on their own ethics, values and knowledge structure. By comparing the different attitudes and practices of China and the United States and other countries towards public opinion, at the same time, on the basis of summing up and analyzing the present situation of public opinion and judicial decision in our country, we can answer the question of why public opinion should enter the judicial system. With theoretical basis and realistic backing, under the recognition of the legitimacy of public opinion as the basis of judicial adjudication, this paper makes a brief discussion on how public opinion can reasonably and legally enter into the specific path of justice. At the same time, we should adhere to the independence of the judiciary, including the cultivation of legal beliefs, the appropriate norms of the media and the advantages of the people's jury system, and explore the balance between the two. When public opinion can participate in the administration of justice in a reasonable and effective way, people will be able to re-examine justice from a more rational perspective, and the public opinion and the judiciary will be able to maintain a greater degree of consistency.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：太原科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 錢大軍,張成元;法律解釋的必為性和可行性[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2002年07期

2 蘇力;判決書的背后[J];法學(xué)研究;2001年03期

3 孫笑俠;法治、合理性及其代價(jià)[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;1997年01期

4 冀祥德;;民憤的正讀——杜培武、佘祥林等錯(cuò)案的司法性反思[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2006年01期

5 孫笑俠,熊靜波;判決與民意——兼比較考察中美法官如何對待民意[J];政法論壇;2005年05期

6 葛洪義;試論法律論證的概念、意義與方法[J];浙江社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張艷軍;試析司法與民意的關(guān)系[D];貴州大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1858307