本文選題：人民陪審員 + 選任�。� 參考：《寧波大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：人民陪審員制度試點改革正如火如荼地進行中,研究人民陪審員的選任與管理制度對于推進改革具有鮮明的現(xiàn)實意義。本文先從人民陪審員的定位入手,再對我國人民陪審員選任與管理制度作一梳理,然后對英美法系和大陸法系國家所適用的陪審員選任與管理制度進行分析對比并總結優(yōu)秀經驗,最后提出對我國人民陪審員選任與管理制度的優(yōu)化建議。文章第一部分,主要明確人民陪審員的定位,包括角色定位和價值定位。論述人民陪審員的職責,包括依法按時參加審判活動、審閱案卷、參加案件的調查和調解、積極參加案件評議并對事實問題進行表決的實質性的職責和忠于憲法和法律,公正司法,秉公辦案,遵守廉政紀律等形式性的職責。最后根據(jù)其職責討論人民陪審員的角色定位和價值定位。文章第二部分,對我國人民陪審員選任與管理制度作一梳理。首先就制度現(xiàn)狀作一檢視,梳理從2004年到2016年有關人民陪審員制度的主要規(guī)范依據(jù)。其次就人民陪審員選任與管理制度存在的問題分別進行深入地剖析。選任制度方面主要是選任標準過嚴和選任程序不規(guī)范;而管理制度方面主要是缺乏專屬管理機構、缺乏履職保障機制以及參審權利義務不明三方面。從法律制度層面到實際運作情況做一展開,為下文對策的提出打好基礎。文章第三部分,分析域外陪審員選任與管理制度。首先解讀英美法系國家是以陪審員平民化為主,側重解決事實問題。其次解讀大陸法系國家也是以陪審員平民化為主,既解決法律問題又解決事實問題。最后將兩者對陪審員選任與管理模式進行對比,以此獲得對我國人民陪審員選任與管理的啟發(fā)與借鑒。文章第四部分,介紹人民陪審員制度的改革背景,立足實際,結合第一部分對人民陪審員的定位,第二部分所陳述的問題以及借鑒第三部分所談到的域外經驗,就我國人民陪審員選任與管理制度的優(yōu)化提出對策,以此來保證這一制度健康有序地發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The pilot reform of the people's jury system is in full swing, and it is of great practical significance to study the selection and management system of the people's jurors. This article begins with the orientation of the people's jurors, and then combs the selection and management system of the people's jurors in our country. Then, the author analyzes and compares the selection and management system of jurors in Anglo-American law system and civil law system, and summarizes the excellent experience, and finally puts forward some suggestions to optimize the selection and management system of people's jurors in China. The first part of the article, mainly clear the positioning of people's assessors, including role positioning and value positioning. Expounding the duties of the people's assessors, including their substantive duty to participate in trial activities according to law, to review case files, to participate in the investigation and mediation of cases, to participate actively in case deliberations and to vote on factual issues, and to be faithful to the Constitution and the law, Fair administration of justice, impartial handling of cases, abiding by the discipline of clean government and other formal duties. Finally, the role and value orientation of the people's jurors are discussed according to their duties. The second part of the article, to our people's jury selection and management system to make a comb. Firstly, this paper reviews the current situation of the system, combing the main normative basis of the people's jury system from 2004 to 2016. Secondly, the problems existing in the selection and management system of people's jurors are analyzed in depth. The system of election and appointment is mainly too strict and the procedure of selection is not standardized, while the management system is mainly lack of exclusive management organization, lack of duty guarantee mechanism and unclear rights and obligations of participation in trial. From the legal system level to the actual operation to do a start, for the following countermeasures to lay a good foundation. The third part of the article analyzes the foreign jury selection and management system. First of all, the interpretation of Anglo-American law countries is mainly to jury populism, focusing on solving factual problems. Secondly, the interpretation of civil law countries is mainly jurors, both legal and factual issues. Finally, the author contrasts the two models of jury selection and management, so as to obtain inspiration and reference to the selection and management of Chinese people's jurors. The fourth part of the article introduces the background of the reform of the people's jury system, based on the reality, combined with the positioning of the people's jury in the first part, the second part of the statement of the problems and learn from the third part of the extraterritorial experience, In order to ensure the healthy and orderly development of the people's jury selection and management system of our country, this paper puts forward some countermeasures.
【學位授予單位】：寧波大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D926.2

【相似文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 劉涌海;我國人民陪審員的選任與管理制度研究[D];寧波大學;2017年

2 方宇強;論民事訴訟中法律審與事實審分離陪審模式的構建[D];寧波大學;2017年

3 王芳;以審判為中心若干基本問題研究[D];青島大學;2017年

，

本文編號：1778887