發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-17 18:34

  本文選題：刑事和解 + 檢察機(jī)關(guān)��； 參考：《吉林大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：檢調(diào)對(duì)接是指檢察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)輕微刑事案件、控申信訪糾紛、民事申訴執(zhí)行和解案件，在當(dāng)事人自愿申請(qǐng)下，進(jìn)行有組織的、規(guī)范化的、非訴訟式的調(diào)解處理的一種工作機(jī)制。做為推進(jìn)“化解社會(huì)矛盾、創(chuàng)新社會(huì)管理、執(zhí)法公正廉潔”三項(xiàng)重點(diǎn)工作的有力舉措。既符合構(gòu)建社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)客觀要求，又趨向以人為本的司法理念，在經(jīng)過(guò)扎實(shí)的基層司法實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)積累之后，必將會(huì)得到廣泛的社會(huì)認(rèn)同和發(fā)展空間。不失為是新形勢(shì)下檢察機(jī)關(guān)執(zhí)法辦案的一種創(chuàng)新型機(jī)制。 檢調(diào)對(duì)接的主要措施之一——刑事和解，受到了實(shí)務(wù)界和理論界的高度關(guān)注。主要是因該制度契合了國(guó)內(nèi)構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)的主題及國(guó)際恢復(fù)性司法的刑事司法潮流。 傳統(tǒng)刑事法國(guó)家的中國(guó)，由于目前相關(guān)的理念與制度及相關(guān)工作機(jī)制均對(duì)刑事和解的實(shí)踐探索造成了極大的困境，影響了刑罰目的的有效實(shí)現(xiàn)。所以對(duì)相關(guān)理念、制度及工作機(jī)制進(jìn)行改造和革新，才能為推進(jìn)刑事和解這一工作機(jī)制的構(gòu)建及施行提供可能的出路。 我國(guó)憲法明確規(guī)定，人民檢察院是中華人民共和國(guó)的法律監(jiān)督機(jī)關(guān)。其法律監(jiān)督的地位和職責(zé)決定了檢察機(jī)關(guān)在落實(shí)各項(xiàng)工作中的重要地位�，F(xiàn)代檢察權(quán)具有制約國(guó)家公權(quán)力的行使保障公民權(quán)利的雙重功能。這就決定了我國(guó)檢察機(jī)關(guān)必須把民眾的新的司法需求作為檢察工作的出發(fā)點(diǎn)和檢驗(yàn)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。刑事和解是應(yīng)民眾的新的司法需求而生，但檢察機(jī)關(guān)在刑事和解中的地位卻不甚明了。在新刑訴法頒布前，檢察機(jī)關(guān)將刑事和解作為一種化解社會(huì)矛盾的工作機(jī)制在積極推進(jìn)，但由于沒(méi)有法律明確規(guī)定，檢察機(jī)關(guān)逐漸陷入了尷尬的境地，，是積極主持和解還是消極監(jiān)督和解，如何保持中立的地位，如何維護(hù)法律的權(quán)威，難題層出不窮。 在刑事和解探索過(guò)程中，種種現(xiàn)實(shí)困境與障礙擺在檢察機(jī)關(guān)面前，使其功能難以發(fā)揮。刑事和解作為一種制度改革，在初級(jí)階段，進(jìn)行多種嘗試，這是難免的，也是應(yīng)該的，但隨著改革的不斷深入、發(fā)展，需要一個(gè)完整統(tǒng)一的實(shí)施方案。我們應(yīng)在大量前期工作的基礎(chǔ)上，經(jīng)過(guò)充分的分析和研究而制定出一個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，才能做到行之有法，依之有據(jù)，使得這一制度得以循序漸進(jìn)，健康的發(fā)展。理性地看待刑事和解在刑事法制中的地位和作用，對(duì)于這一制度未來(lái)命運(yùn)而言至關(guān)重要。過(guò)度夸大其效用，和無(wú)情貶低其意義一樣，都會(huì)給這項(xiàng)制度創(chuàng)新帶來(lái)“厄運(yùn)”。 由于該制度尚處于初級(jí)發(fā)展階段，與原有相關(guān)理念、制度以及相關(guān)工作機(jī)制所迸發(fā)出的有關(guān)問(wèn)題出現(xiàn)在我們的面前。短短幾年備受推崇后，該制度實(shí)踐開(kāi)始受到不斷的質(zhì)疑。刑事和解關(guān)涉對(duì)諸多基本法治理念的再認(rèn)識(shí)問(wèn)題，學(xué)者們認(rèn)為刑事和解的正當(dāng)性在于，其在政治上有利于和諧社會(huì)的構(gòu)建，在法律上符合寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)的刑事政策，而在理論研究中又順應(yīng)了“恢復(fù)性司法”的理念。為了能更有效地保證調(diào)解者的中立性與和解協(xié)議的自愿性。那么對(duì)于刑事和解的模式則認(rèn)為由社會(huì)上中立的調(diào)解機(jī)構(gòu)來(lái)主持更為合適。為了確保刑事和解達(dá)到良好的社會(huì)效果以及該制度的正當(dāng)性，我們應(yīng)在對(duì)刑事和解的適用范圍和對(duì)象條件作出明確限定的同時(shí)還要防止該制度的濫用。 刑事和解尚處于初期的發(fā)展階段，本文意圖是通過(guò)研究當(dāng)前檢察機(jī)關(guān)適用刑事和解案件的情況，來(lái)反映檢察機(jī)關(guān)在適用刑事和解的實(shí)踐探索過(guò)程中存在的諸多問(wèn)題，并對(duì)該問(wèn)題加以評(píng)析，同時(shí)提出完善相關(guān)制度和改革檢察機(jī)關(guān)適用刑事和解的基本思路。使該制度的理念與思想逐漸得到公眾認(rèn)同，逐步被大家所接受。做為未來(lái)我國(guó)刑事司法制度改革的必然選擇，作為法律監(jiān)督的檢察機(jī)關(guān)，適用刑事和解能否有效達(dá)到定紛止?fàn)幒蛯?shí)現(xiàn)公正的價(jià)值目標(biāo)以及充分發(fā)揮司法行為對(duì)社會(huì)關(guān)系的調(diào)控功能，在本文中得以全面的闡述與詮釋。
[Abstract]:The procuratorial mediation refers to the procuratorial organs for minor criminal cases, kongshen petition dispute settlement case, civil enforcement complaint in voluntary parties, organized, standardized, a working mechanism of non litigation mediation type. As to resolve social conflicts, promote the innovation of social management, effective measures law enforcement "impartial and honest three key work. Not only conforms to the objective requirement of building a socialist harmonious society, and the trend of people-oriented concept of justice, after a solid grassroots judicial practice experience, will obtain social identity and broad development space. It is an innovative mechanism for law enforcement prosecutors handling the case under the new situation.
Victim offender reconciliation is one of the main measures in the field of mediation and adjustment. It is highly concerned by practitioners and theorists. The main reason is that the system corresponds to the theme of building a harmonious society in China and the trend of international restorative justice.
The traditional criminal law countries China, due to the current concept and related system and related work mechanism of practice of criminal reconciliation exploration has caused great difficulties, affecting the effective realization of the penalty. So the relevant concept, system and work mechanism of reform and innovation, in order to provide a possible way forward for construction and Implementation of the promotion of criminal the settlement of this system.
China's Constitution clearly stipulates that the people's Procuratorate of People's Republic of China is the legal supervision organ. The status and functions of legal supervision of the procuratorial organs in the decision to implement the important position in the work of the modern procuratorial power has double functions of restricting public rights to protect the rights of citizens. This determines that China must take the public prosecution the new judicial demand as the starting point of procuratorial work and inspection standards. Criminal reconciliation should be the new civil legal needs of students, but the status of the procuratorial organs in criminal reconciliation is not clear. The promulgation of the new criminal procedure law, the procuratorial organs of criminal reconciliation as a mechanism to resolve social contradictions in the actively promote, but because there is no clear legal provisions, procuratorial organs gradually embarrassment, actively hosted reconciliation or passively supervise, how to remain neutral Status, how to safeguard the authority of the law, problems emerge in an endless stream.
Criminal reconciliation in the exploration process, various practical difficulties and obstacles placed in front of the procuratorial organs, the function is difficult to play. As a kind of criminal reconciliation system reform in the primary stage, a variety of attempts, this is inevitable, it should be, but with the continuous deepening of reform and development, the need for a complete unity the implementation of the program. We should be based on a lot of preliminary work, after sufficient analysis and research and develop a standard to do the law, according to the evidence, making this system be gradual, healthy development. Rational view on the status and function of criminal reconciliation in the criminal legal system. For thefuture of this system is very important. To overstate its utility, and ruthlessly belittle the significance, will give the system innovation to bring the "bad luck".
Because the system is still in the primary stage of development, and the original ideas, issues related to system and working mechanism to burst out of the show in front of us. Just a few years after the highly respected, the practice of the system has been constantly questioned. On the basis of criminal reconciliation involves many legal concept recognition problems, scholars believe the legitimacy of the criminal settlement is that it is conducive to building a harmonious society in politics, accord with the criminal policy of combining punishment with leniency in law, and in the theoretical study and conforms to the concept of restorative justice. In order to more effectively ensure the neutrality of the mediator and settlement agreement for voluntary. The criminal reconciliation mode is considered by the community mediation organization neutral to chair is more suitable. In order to ensure that the criminal reconciliation achieved good social effect and the legitimacy of the system, we should be in The application scope and object conditions of criminal reconciliation should be clearly defined and the abuse of the system should be prevented.
The criminal reconciliation is still in the initial stage of development, this paper is intended by the current procuratorial organs of criminal reconciliation case, to reflect the problems existing in the practice of the procuratorial organs for criminal reconciliation in the process of exploring, and the problem of the basic ideas to improve the relevant system and the reform of the procuratorial organs of criminal reconciliation the ideas and thoughts. This system has gradually been public recognition, has been accepted. As an inevitable choice for the future criminal judicial system reform of our country, as the procuratorial organs of legal supervision, application of criminal reconciliation can effectively settle disputes and achieve the value goal of justice and give full play to the regulatory function of judicial behavior the social relations, to elaborate and comprehensive interpretation in this paper.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2;D926.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭志媛;;對(duì)抗與合作:我國(guó)刑事訴訟改革的模式定位[J];中國(guó)司法;2006年12期

2 時(shí)延安;;刑事和解正當(dāng)性之辨[J];東方法學(xué);2010年03期

3 周靈敏;;檢察機(jī)關(guān)開(kāi)展刑事和解若干建議[J];福建法學(xué);2010年03期

4 吳建雄;李江發(fā);;和諧司法理念的實(shí)踐價(jià)值——對(duì)湖南省3起刑事和解案件的法理評(píng)析[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年03期

5 甄貞;陳靜;;建設(shè)和諧社會(huì)與構(gòu)建刑事和解制度的思考[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年04期

6 裴永林;封貴平;;大學(xué)生刑事被害預(yù)防與維權(quán)[J];貴州民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

7 龔永強(qiáng);張亞力;賈永強(qiáng);;檢察視野下刑事和解的理論與實(shí)踐[J];昆明理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年09期

8 林欣;;論檢察機(jī)關(guān)在刑事和解程序中的功能定位[J];學(xué)理論;2010年30期

9 田金融;;對(duì)辦理當(dāng)事人達(dá)成和解刑事案件的認(rèn)識(shí)與思考[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2010年13期

10 高素云;武美華;;試論刑事和解在檢察機(jī)關(guān)中的應(yīng)用[J];山西高等學(xué)校社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年12期

本文編號(hào)：1764779