本文選題：司法解釋 + 司法解釋權(quán)　； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：在我國(guó)，司法解釋可以說(shuō)是具有中國(guó)特色的一個(gè)法律現(xiàn)象，其作為聯(lián)系立法規(guī)范原則性和司法實(shí)務(wù)可操作性的紐帶，，在司法實(shí)踐中起著重要作用，對(duì)案件審判工作的重要影響也是不言而喻，其核心內(nèi)容  司法解釋權(quán)的配置，更是成為了司法解釋合法性與合理性的關(guān)鍵所在。如何配置司法解釋權(quán)一直是理論界和司法實(shí)務(wù)界密切關(guān)注的問(wèn)題。目前我國(guó)司法解釋權(quán)的配置不同于國(guó)外，在國(guó)外司法解釋權(quán)主要配置于法院或法官，而我國(guó)根據(jù)《人民法院組織法》、1981年全國(guó)人大常務(wù)委員會(huì)頒布的《關(guān)于加強(qiáng)法律解釋工作的決議》等相關(guān)規(guī)定，司法解釋權(quán)配置給最高人民法院和最高人民檢察院來(lái)共同行使，這一獨(dú)具特色的司法解釋權(quán)配置是著其歷史的發(fā)展基礎(chǔ)的，同時(shí)這種配置從一定程度上來(lái)說(shuō)對(duì)于我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐的運(yùn)行起著重要的作用，使得案件能夠及時(shí)的作出判決，彌補(bǔ)了立法的滯后性，但這種獨(dú)具特色的配置隨著社會(huì)的不斷發(fā)展和不斷革新的法律觀念也暴露其存在一些不合理之處，如司法解釋權(quán)的現(xiàn)行立法依據(jù)方面；同時(shí)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行司法解釋權(quán)的配置也存在著許多方面的問(wèn)題，本文主要從主體和權(quán)限兩方面存在的問(wèn)題予以了分析，如在主體方面最高檢作為我國(guó)司法解釋權(quán)的“一元”是否合適？在現(xiàn)行的我國(guó)司法運(yùn)作環(huán)境中賦予法官個(gè)案司法解釋權(quán)是否合適？在權(quán)限方面，司法解釋權(quán)侵犯立法權(quán)的現(xiàn)象的存在。筆者針對(duì)這些問(wèn)題認(rèn)真地進(jìn)行了反思，也相應(yīng)地提出了完善的建議，為我國(guó)司法解釋權(quán)配置的改革提供一定的參考。
[Abstract]:In China, judicial interpretation can be said to be a legal phenomenon with Chinese characteristics. As a link between the principle of legislative norms and the maneuverability of judicial practice, judicial interpretation plays an important role in judicial practice.The important influence on the trial work is also self-evident, and its core content is the allocation of judicial interpretation power, which has become the key to the legitimacy and rationality of judicial interpretation.How to allocate the power of judicial interpretation has always been a matter of close concern in the field of theory and judicial practice.At present, the allocation of judicial interpretation power in our country is different from that in foreign countries. In foreign countries, judicial interpretation power is mainly allocated to courts or judges.In accordance with the Organic Law of the people's Court and the Resolution on strengthening the interpretation of laws promulgated by the standing Committee of the National people's Congress in 1981, the power of judicial interpretation is allocated to the Supreme people's Court and the Supreme people's Procuratorate to exercise it jointly.This unique disposition of judicial interpretation power is the basis of its historical development. At the same time, to a certain extent, it plays an important role in the operation of judicial practice in our country, so that cases can be adjudicated in a timely manner.It makes up for the lag of legislation, but with the constant development of society and the constant innovation of the legal concept, this unique disposition also exposes some unreasonable points, such as the current legislative basis of the power of judicial interpretation;At the same time, there are many problems in the allocation of the power of judicial interpretation in our country.Such as in the subject of the highest procuratorate as our country's judicial interpretation of the power of "one dollar" is appropriate?Is it appropriate to give judges the power of judicial interpretation in the current judicial environment of our country?In terms of competence, the existence of the phenomenon that the judicial interpretation power infringes on the legislative power.In view of these problems, the author seriously reflects on these problems, and puts forward some perfect suggestions accordingly, which provides a certain reference for the reform of the allocation of judicial interpretation power in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 袁明圣;司法解釋“立法化”現(xiàn)象探微[J];法商研究;2003年02期

2 陳興良;司法解釋功過(guò)之議[J];法學(xué);2003年08期

3 吳萍,蒙柳;海峽兩岸司法解釋之比較[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

4 張宇;李俊明;;對(duì)司法解釋“立法化”的思考[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年06期

5 董v

本文編號(hào)：1739179