本文選題：審判獨立　切入點：新聞監(jiān)督　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：包括審判獨立在內(nèi)的司法獨立與以新聞監(jiān)督為主的社會監(jiān)督的關(guān)系,也就是司法與傳媒的關(guān)系,是社會主義法治化建設(shè)進程中的一個重要而敏感的問題。社會各界對二者之間關(guān)系的爭論由來已久,從未停歇。激烈的爭論一方面將二者沖突一面的枝末細節(jié)都展露無疑,另一方面也引發(fā)了大眾對調(diào)和二者關(guān)系的深入思考。任何一個事物都有其兩面性,審判獨立和新聞監(jiān)督之間既有沖突也有互助,新聞監(jiān)督在促進公正司法的同時也沖擊司法的獨立性,尤其是審判獨立;審判獨立要求一個相對封閉,能夠盡可能的排除外界環(huán)境和因素干擾的空間,也就天然的會對新聞監(jiān)督有排斥的心理。因此,如何劃定兩種權(quán)利的行使界限,構(gòu)建二者之間的平衡點,是司法實踐中亟需解決的現(xiàn)實問題。也正是基于這種現(xiàn)實的緊迫性,最高人民法院于2009年12月8日印發(fā)了《關(guān)于人民法院接受新聞媒體輿論監(jiān)督的若干規(guī)定》,對法院主動要求公開和接受新聞監(jiān)督做了一個積極的表態(tài),也給今后新聞立法時設(shè)置相應(yīng)的規(guī)制性條款提供了可借鑒的內(nèi)容。 本文主要以有代表性的具體鮮活案例引出問題,運用比較分析方法、實證分析方法、辯證分析方法等研究方法,直面實踐中傳媒和司法沖突不斷的現(xiàn)狀,分析問題,探討解決問題的方法。從傳統(tǒng)媒介和新興網(wǎng)絡(luò)類媒介不同的監(jiān)督方式,幾近相同的監(jiān)督困境,揭示新聞監(jiān)督司法的現(xiàn)狀。分析《關(guān)于人民法院接受新聞媒體輿論監(jiān)督的若干規(guī)定》對司法審判權(quán)的新聞監(jiān)督的影響,綜合新聞學(xué)和司法的視角,揭示第四種權(quán)力的重要性及其法律屬性,說明新聞監(jiān)督對司法審判的重要意義。最后,從操作層面和具體監(jiān)督程序的設(shè)計角度,初討新聞監(jiān)督應(yīng)遵循的基本原則以及增強監(jiān)督的合力和實效的方法,以期達到共贏局面,共同推進社會主義法治建設(shè)。
[Abstract]:The relationship between judicial independence, including judicial independence, and social supervision based on news supervision, that is, the relationship between the judiciary and the media, is an important and sensitive issue in the process of socialist legalization construction.The debate on the relationship between the two has a long history and never stops.On the one hand, the fierce debate reveals the details of the two conflicts, on the other hand, it also leads the public to think deeply about reconciling the two relations.Every thing has its dual character, there are conflicts and mutual assistance between judicial independence and news supervision. News supervision not only promotes the fair administration of justice, but also impinges on the independence of the judiciary, especially the independence of the trial.Trial independence requires a relatively closed, as far as possible to eliminate the external environment and factors interference space, it is natural to the supervision of the news will have rejection of the psychology.Therefore, how to delimit the limits of exercise of the two rights and construct the balance point between them is a practical problem that needs to be solved in judicial practice.And because of the urgency of this reality,On December 8, 2009, the Supreme people's Court issued several provisions on the people's Court's acceptance of supervision by public opinion in the news media, which made a positive statement on the court's initiative to request publicity and accept news supervision.It also provides reference for the establishment of corresponding regulation clauses in news legislation in the future.This article mainly uses the representative concrete fresh case to raise the question, uses the comparative analysis method, the demonstration analysis method, the dialectical analysis method and so on research method, faces the media and the judicial conflict unceasingly in the practice present situation, analyzes the question.Explore the solution to the problem.From the traditional media and the new network media different supervision ways, almost the same supervision dilemma, to reveal the current situation of news supervision and justice.This paper analyzes the influence of the regulations on the acceptance of supervision by public opinion in the people's courts on the supervision of the judicial jurisdiction, synthesizes the perspectives of journalism and justice, and reveals the importance and legal attributes of the fourth kind of power.Explain the important significance of news supervision to judicial trial.Finally, from the aspect of operation and the design of concrete supervision procedure, this paper discusses the basic principles that should be followed by news supervision and the methods of strengthening the resultant force and actual effect of supervision, in order to achieve a win-win situation and jointly advance the construction of socialist rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 沈正賦;新聞監(jiān)督與司法獨立之間的辯證關(guān)系[J];當(dāng)代傳播;2002年01期

2 張澤濤;論新聞監(jiān)督司法的制度設(shè)置[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年05期

3 郭衛(wèi)華;劉園園;;論媒體與法院的良性互動[J];法學(xué)評論;2008年01期

4 宋素紅,羅斌;兩大法系媒體與司法關(guān)系比較[J];國際新聞界;2005年05期

5 伍芬艷,周細波;輿論監(jiān)督和我國的司法獨立——對“劉涌案”、“寶馬撞人案”的思索[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2004年05期

6 徐迅;中國媒體與司法關(guān)系現(xiàn)狀評析[J];法學(xué)研究;2001年06期

7 賀衛(wèi)方;傳媒與司法三題[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年06期

8 趙金 ,楊立新;公眾人物與“媒體暴政”[J];青年記者;2004年09期

9 車英,成協(xié)中,孫磊;論新聞輿論監(jiān)督與司法獨立[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文科學(xué)版);2002年06期

10 景漢朝;傳媒監(jiān)督與司法獨立的沖突與契合[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2002年01期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條

1 賀衛(wèi)方;[N];中國婦女報;2005年

2 畢玉謙;[N];人民法院報;2001年

，

本文編號：1724539