我國監(jiān)獄警察個人權(quán)力保障研究
本文選題:監(jiān)獄警察 切入點:個人權(quán)利 出處:《華中師范大學》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:當前,隨著全面依法治國戰(zhàn)略的不斷深化,我國監(jiān)獄機關的法治建設也取得了良好的成效。但是在監(jiān)獄的法治發(fā)展進程中,我國對監(jiān)獄警察的個人權(quán)利保障還不夠重視、力度還有待加強。長期以來,監(jiān)獄警察為執(zhí)行國家法律、維護法律權(quán)威、促進社會安定穩(wěn)定,作出了很大貢獻。可是因為國家有關立法不夠完善,有關部門不夠重視,監(jiān)獄機關能力有限,監(jiān)獄警察自身維權(quán)意識和能力缺失,加上外部環(huán)境不支持,導致他們的個人權(quán)利屢受侵害,且維權(quán)無門。筆者作為監(jiān)獄警察隊伍的一份子,在不斷地加強法律知識學習、查閱相關文獻以及結(jié)合實際開展調(diào)研的基礎上,對監(jiān)獄警察的個人權(quán)利保障問題進行研究和分析,找出我國在此方面存在的疏失及其原因,探討完善監(jiān)獄警察個人權(quán)利保障的對策。本文第一部分對監(jiān)獄警察個人權(quán)利保障的內(nèi)涵和必要性進行闡述,提出監(jiān)獄警察的個人權(quán)利保障應立足對監(jiān)獄警察普通公民權(quán)利、國家公務員權(quán)利和特殊職業(yè)權(quán)利的依法保障,認為保障監(jiān)獄警察的個人權(quán)利是推進全面依法治國的題中之義,是維護社會公共利益的必然要求,是權(quán)責平衡的法理體現(xiàn)、是我國人權(quán)保障的重要部分。本文第二部分主要介紹域外國家在保障監(jiān)獄工作人員權(quán)利方面的做法,分析其特點,通過比較,增進我們對監(jiān)獄警察個人權(quán)利保障的認識和理解,查找存在的不足和差距,并且洋為中用,為我國進一步完善相關工作提供參考和借鑒。本文第三部分從法律法規(guī)不夠健全、救濟途徑較為單一、職業(yè)危害控制不足、物質(zhì)保障未有效落實、社會支持基礎薄弱等五個方面,指出我國在監(jiān)獄警察個人權(quán)利保障措施方面存在的疏失,并深入分析造成以上疏失的原因,為下一步制定對策提供有力依據(jù)。本文第四部分落實到問題的解決上,認為完善監(jiān)獄警察的個人權(quán)利保障應遵循人權(quán)保障原則、公平正義原則、平衡制約原則,從健全法律法規(guī)、豐富救濟途徑、增強職業(yè)危害的控制、有效落實物質(zhì)保障、強化社會支持基礎等五個方面提出了完善的建議。
[Abstract]:At present, with the deepening of the strategy of ruling the country according to law, the construction of the rule of law in our country's prison institutions has also achieved good results.However, in the process of the development of prison's rule of law, our country has not paid enough attention to the protection of the prison police's personal rights, and the intensity needs to be strengthened.For a long time, prison police have made great contributions to the enforcement of national laws, the maintenance of legal authority and the promotion of social stability.However, because the relevant national legislation is not perfect, the relevant departments do not attach enough importance to it, the capacity of the prison authorities is limited, the awareness and ability of the prison police to protect their rights is lacking, and the external environment is not supported, their personal rights are frequently infringed upon.And the rights do not have a door.As a member of the prison police team, the author, on the basis of continuously strengthening the study of legal knowledge, consulting relevant documents and combining with the actual investigation, studies and analyses the protection of the personal rights of the prison police.This paper finds out the negligence and reasons in this respect, and probes into the countermeasures to perfect the protection of the personal rights of the prison police.The first part of this paper expounds the connotation and necessity of the protection of the individual rights of the prison police, and puts forward that the protection of the personal rights of the prison police should be based on the legal protection of the rights of ordinary citizens of the prison police, the rights of the state civil servants and the special professional rights.It is considered that the protection of the personal rights of the prison police is the meaning of promoting the overall rule of law, the inevitable requirement of safeguarding the social and public interests, the legal principle embodiment of the balance of power and responsibility, and the important part of the protection of human rights in our country.The second part of this paper mainly introduces the foreign countries in the protection of the rights of prison staff, analyzes its characteristics, through comparison, to enhance our understanding and understanding of the prison police personal rights protection, to find out the shortcomings and gaps.And the use of foreign for China, for our country to further improve the relevant work to provide reference and reference.The third part of this article is divided into five aspects: the laws and regulations are not perfect, the relief way is relatively single, the occupational hazard control is insufficient, the material security is not effectively implemented, and the foundation of social support is weak.This paper points out the negligence in the protection measures of the personal rights of the prison police in our country, and analyzes the causes of the above negligence in depth, which provides a strong basis for the next step in formulating the countermeasures.In the fourth part of this paper, the author points out that to perfect the personal rights of the prison police should follow the principles of human rights, fairness and justice, balance and restriction, and enrich the remedy ways by perfecting the laws and regulations.Some suggestions are put forward in five aspects, such as strengthening the control of occupational hazards, effectively implementing material security and strengthening the foundation of social support.
【學位授予單位】:華中師范大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:D926.7
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 賈蕊;;警察執(zhí)法權(quán)益保障的法制建構(gòu)路徑[J];法制與社會;2016年09期
2 胡方銳;;法治監(jiān)獄內(nèi)涵及建設路徑的設定[J];中國司法;2016年01期
3 李冬;;警察權(quán)益保障的立法建議[J];行政與法;2014年08期
4 韓廣俊;;法律和公平正義[J];齊齊哈爾師范高等?茖W校學報;2014年04期
5 潘志鋒;;近二十年來關于“警察權(quán)益”的研究綜述[J];政法學刊;2013年01期
6 萬安中;;美國監(jiān)獄發(fā)展及管理的經(jīng)驗及啟示研究[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學院學報;2013年01期
7 李震宇;;國外警察權(quán)力性質(zhì)與監(jiān)督比較研究[J];文學界(理論版);2012年06期
8 黃永輝;張清鳳;;當前監(jiān)獄民警的 “執(zhí)法困境”與對策[J];中國司法;2011年10期
9 楊寶成;;論警察執(zhí)法權(quán)益的法律保障[J];學習論壇;2010年10期
10 周雪峰;;社會主義法治理念的公平正義觀[J];武漢科技大學學報(社會科學版);2010年03期
相關碩士學位論文 前2條
1 周成;監(jiān)獄人民警察權(quán)益保障問題研究[D];安徽大學;2013年
2 姜久功;論監(jiān)獄人民警察個人權(quán)益和執(zhí)法權(quán)力的保障[D];山東大學;2013年
,本文編號:1712570
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1712570.html