發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-31 19:46

  本文選題：刑罰執(zhí)行　切入點(diǎn)：減刑假釋　出處：《中國海洋大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為國家的刑罰執(zhí)行機(jī)關(guān),監(jiān)獄承擔(dān)著正確執(zhí)行刑罰,懲罰和改造罪犯,預(yù)防和減少犯罪的職能。監(jiān)獄工作的核心是刑罰執(zhí)行工作,而刑罰執(zhí)行工作的重中之重就是罪犯減刑假釋工作。隨著監(jiān)獄刑罰執(zhí)行工作科學(xué)化、規(guī)范化、精細(xì)化建設(shè)的不斷深化,特別是刑法修正案(八)和2012年《關(guān)于辦理減刑、假釋案件具體應(yīng)用法律若干問題的規(guī)定》頒布后,監(jiān)獄減刑假釋工作出現(xiàn)了一些新特點(diǎn)、新問題,亟需對監(jiān)獄減刑假釋工作進(jìn)行深入探討和研究,給予新的定位和認(rèn)識(shí),做好完善工作。 從世界減刑假釋的發(fā)展歷史不難看出,盡管有裁定機(jī)構(gòu)、減刑假釋條件、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、幅度等差異,但不可否認(rèn)的是,減刑假釋在不同時(shí)期、不同國家的刑事法律體系中均扮演了重要角色,起到了重要的法律調(diào)節(jié)作用。我國減刑假釋工作起步較晚,但新中國成立后發(fā)展迅速,陸續(xù)于1954年頒布了《勞動(dòng)改造條例》,1979年頒布了《刑法》和《刑事訴訟法》,1994年頒布了《監(jiān)獄法》,并于1991年、1997年和2011年最高人民法院先后三次頒布《關(guān)于辦理減刑、假釋案件具體應(yīng)用法律若干問題的規(guī)定》。這一系列法律和規(guī)定的頒布實(shí)施,有力地推進(jìn)了我國減刑假釋制度的完善和發(fā)展,使得假釋減刑制度得以良好地運(yùn)行,為做好罪犯改造工作奠定了扎實(shí)的基礎(chǔ)。但是,在司法實(shí)踐中由于法制概念模糊、缺乏量化標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不統(tǒng)一、缺乏有效監(jiān)督等原因,致使監(jiān)獄在辦理罪犯減刑假釋案件中存在諸如：減刑假釋實(shí)質(zhì)條件不清晰,減刑率過高、假釋率過低,減刑假釋標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不統(tǒng)一,減刑假釋缺乏有效監(jiān)督等問題,亟待完善�，F(xiàn)結(jié)合監(jiān)獄工作實(shí)際,認(rèn)真分析監(jiān)獄執(zhí)法中存在的問題,重點(diǎn)圍繞立法完善、減刑假釋辦理標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、減刑假釋辦理程序、事后監(jiān)督等方面,針對問題逐一提出有效完善措施,為進(jìn)一步做好刑罰執(zhí)行工作奠定基礎(chǔ)。
[Abstract]:As the national penalty enforcement organ, the prison undertakes the function of correctly carrying out the penalty, punishing and reforming the criminal, preventing and reducing the crime. The core of the prison work is the execution of the penalty. The most important task in the execution of punishment is the commutation and parole of criminals. With the deepening of the scientific, standardized and meticulous construction of prison penalty enforcement, especially the Criminal Law Amendment (8) and the Criminal Law Amendment (8) and 2012 < on dealing with commutation of sentences, After the promulgation of the regulations on the specific Application of Law in Parole cases, some new features and problems have appeared in the prison commutation and parole work. It is urgent to make a thorough discussion and study on the prison commutation and parole work, and give a new orientation and understanding. Do a good job of perfecting. It is not difficult to see from the history of the development of commutation and parole in the world that, although there are differences in adjudication institutions, conditions, standards, and extent of parole, it is undeniable that commutation and parole take place in different periods. The criminal legal systems of different countries have played an important role and played an important role in regulating the law. The commutation and parole work in China started relatively late, but it developed rapidly after the founding of New China. The regulations on Reform through Labour were promulgated in 1954, the Criminal Law and the Code of Criminal procedure were promulgated in 1979, the Prison Law was promulgated in 1994, and the Supreme people's Court promulgated the commutation of sentence three times in 1991, 1997 and 2011. The promulgation and implementation of this series of laws and regulations have pushed forward the perfection and development of the commutation and parole system in China, and have enabled the commutation and parole system to operate well. It has laid a solid foundation for the reform of criminals. However, in judicial practice, due to the vague concept of the legal system, the lack of quantitative standards, the lack of unity of standards, the lack of effective supervision, and so on, As a result, prison has some problems in handling the cases of commutation and parole of criminals, such as: the essential conditions of commutation and parole are not clear, the commutation rate is too high, the parole rate is too low, the standard of commutation and parole is not uniform, and the commutation and parole lacks effective supervision, etc. The problems existing in prison law enforcement are analyzed, focusing on the improvement of legislation, the standards for commutation and parole, the procedures for handling commutation and parole, the supervision after the event, and so on. The effective measures are put forward one by one to lay the foundation for the execution of penalty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國海洋大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D924.1;D926.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉京華;減刑假釋制度的發(fā)展趨勢和利弊[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

2 張波;假釋制度的困境與出路 一個(gè)實(shí)證的考察[J];法律適用;2005年11期

3 周軍;嚴(yán)肅;;對我國減刑制度的反思和若干制度的構(gòu)想[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年21期

4 張鴻巍;;未成年人假釋芻議[J];廣西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年06期

5 杜菊;我國假釋制度運(yùn)作態(tài)勢的反思與探討[J];河南司法警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

6 樊崇義;;減刑假釋程序的理性思考[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年04期

7 李保甫;;試論如何完善我國的減刑假釋制度[J];河南社會(huì)科學(xué);2010年04期

8 鄒群;;論我國假釋監(jiān)督保護(hù)制度的構(gòu)建[J];遼寧警專學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

9 黃太云;;《刑法修正案(八)》解讀(一)[J];人民檢察;2011年06期

10 黃征,鄭牧民;減刑制度的反思與創(chuàng)新[J];湘潭大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2002年S1期

，

本文編號(hào)：1692222