本文選題：推翻先例　切入點：追溯性造法　出處：《東方法學》2017年03期

【摘要】：普通法的法官推翻先例或缺乏法律參考時會進行追溯性造法,這在普通法傳統(tǒng)中是一種常見現(xiàn)象,并且也在學理上得到了支持。更為重要的是,追溯性造法雖然兼具立法和司法的雙重屬性,但這種造法行為卻不會構(gòu)成權(quán)力專斷,因為先例制度中的諸多因素對其構(gòu)成了制約。如果法治的宗旨是防止權(quán)力專斷,那么追溯性造法顯然不會與法治相悖,因為它無法任性或?qū)嗟剡\用權(quán)力。隨著"案例指導制度"在中國司法實踐中的廣泛應用,普通法中推翻先例引發(fā)的追溯性造法問題也會在中國以新的面目出現(xiàn),那么對普通法中相關問題的討論,也許能為我們提供些許啟發(fā),從而有助于推進我國的法治建設。
[Abstract]:A common law judge who overturns precedents or lacks legal reference makes law retroactively, which is a common phenomenon in the common law tradition and is also supported in theory. More importantly, Although retroactive law has the dual attribute of legislation and judicature, it does not constitute power arbitrariness because many factors in precedent system restrict it. If the purpose of the rule of law is to prevent power arbitrariness, Then it is clear that the retroactive law will not contradict the rule of law, because it cannot exercise power willfully or arbitrarily. With the widespread application of the "case guidance system" in judicial practice in China, The problem of retroactive law-making caused by overturning precedents in common law will also appear in China. Therefore, the discussion of relevant issues in common law may provide us with some inspiration and help to promote the construction of the rule of law in our country.
【作者單位】： 西北政法大學行政法學院;
【分類號】：D916.2
，

本文編號：1664005