本文選題：法官造法　切入點：司法解釋　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：本文以法官造法為研究對象。簡單地說,法官造法就是法官在司法過程中為解決案件糾紛而創(chuàng)制具體法律規(guī)則的活動。文章首先分析了法官造法在中國語境下的概念,接著從比較法角度介紹了法官造法在英美法系、大陸法系以及國際法上的發(fā)展?fàn)顩r,最后文章再回到中國,以理論聯(lián)系實際的方法,從必要性到現(xiàn)實狀況,提出一些完善措施,以期為法官造法在中國的理論和實踐的發(fā)展提供一些有益的探索。 全文包括引言、正文和結(jié)論三部分。正文分為五章。 第一章主要對法官造法的概念進(jìn)行基本界定,指出法律既是被創(chuàng)造的,也是被發(fā)現(xiàn)的,并進(jìn)一步指出法官造法在中國及在本文是采納廣義的法官造法概念。 第二章介紹英美法系、大陸法系和國際法領(lǐng)域的法官造法發(fā)展?fàn)顩r。英美法系國家的法官造法是遵循先例原則指導(dǎo)下的最重要的法律淵源,大陸法系國家的法官造法逐步成為成文法之外重要法律淵源,國際法上的法官造法也日益成為解決國際爭端等領(lǐng)域的重要依據(jù)。 第三章分析中國法官造法的必要性和可行性。由于法律漏洞的存在,法官不得拒絕裁判,轉(zhuǎn)型時期社會矛盾多以及憲法司法化的需要,法官造法存在極大的必要性。同時,從法律傳統(tǒng)、政治體制、法官素質(zhì)等方面來看,我國都具備實施法官造法的充分可行性。 第四章具體論述我國現(xiàn)存的法官造法實踐,即司法解釋和“判例”。司法解釋已成為我國法律體系中必不可少的一項重要法律淵源,“判例”也開始逐步發(fā)展起來,二者都對法律漏洞的填補(bǔ)等方面發(fā)揮了重要的作用。當(dāng)然,無論是司法解釋,還是“判例”,都存在一定的不足,有待于進(jìn)一步的發(fā)展和完善。 第五章從范圍、主體、“判例”、監(jiān)督等方面對完善我國法官造法提出具體建議。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the author takes the law of judge making as the object of study. In brief, it is the activity of the judge to create specific legal rules in order to solve the dispute in the judicial process. Firstly, the article analyzes the concept of the law of judge making in the Chinese context. Then, from the angle of comparative law, the author introduces the development of judge law in Anglo-American law system, civil law system and international law. Finally, the article comes back to China and puts forward some perfect measures from necessity to reality by combining theory with practice. In order to provide some beneficial exploration for the development of the theory and practice of the judge-making law in China. The full text includes three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter mainly defines the concept of judge making law, pointing out that the law is not only created but also discovered, and further points out that the judge makes law in China and in this paper adopts the concept of judge making law in a broad sense. The second chapter introduces the development of the law of judges in the fields of common law, civil law and international law. The law of judge in common law system is the most important source of law guided by the principle of precedent. The law of judges in civil law countries has gradually become an important source of law outside of statutory law, and the law of judges in international law has increasingly become an important basis for the settlement of international disputes and other fields. The third chapter analyzes the necessity and feasibility of Chinese judges' lawmaking. Due to the existence of legal loopholes, judges can not refuse to judge. During the transitional period, there are many social contradictions and the need of constitutional judicature. At the same time, there is a great necessity for judges to make law. From the aspects of legal tradition, political system and judge's quality, our country has the full feasibility of implementing the judge's making law. The fourth chapter concretely discusses the existing practice of making law by judges in our country, that is, judicial interpretation and "case law". Judicial interpretation has become an indispensable important legal source in our legal system, and "precedent" has also begun to develop gradually. Both of them have played an important role in filling the legal loopholes. Of course, both judicial interpretation and "precedent" have some shortcomings, which need to be further developed and improved. The fifth chapter puts forward some concrete suggestions on the perfection of our country's judge law from the aspects of scope, subject, case law, supervision and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 張騏;判例法的比較研究——兼論中國建立判例法的意義、制度基礎(chǔ)與操作[J];比較法研究;2002年04期

2 周道鸞;中國案例制度的歷史發(fā)展[J];法律適用;2004年05期

3 何家弘;;論法官造法[J];法學(xué)家;2003年05期

4 劉飛;;德國“法官造法”的功能解構(gòu)[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年01期

5 陳肇強(qiáng);試論世貿(mào)組織法中判例的適用[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2001年02期

6 葛洪義;法官的權(quán)力——中國法官權(quán)力約束制度研究[J];中國法學(xué);2003年04期

7 強(qiáng)世功;憲法司法化的悖論——兼論法學(xué)家在推動憲政中的困境[J];中國社會科學(xué);2003年02期

8 朱景文;;中國訴訟分流的數(shù)據(jù)分析[J];中國社會科學(xué);2008年03期

，

本文編號：1661459