論我國公訴制度改革的幾個問題
本文選題:公訴制度 切入點:附條件不起訴制度 出處:《青島大學》2017年碩士論文 論文類型:學位論文
【摘要】:公訴權是檢察機關作為國家的代表機關來行使追究犯罪的權力,對于懲治犯罪、保障人權及推動社會主義法治建設等方面發(fā)揮著重要的作用。公訴權能的正當行使,對于維護檢察機關的司法公信力,推動社會主義法治社會建立意義重大。公訴制度的有效確立,能夠推動公訴權的有效行使,然而,雖然我國現(xiàn)階段形成了附條件不起訴制度,主任檢察官制度等相關制度,學者也對推動公訴制度的發(fā)展提出了一些建議。但是由于現(xiàn)行法律規(guī)定的缺陷、不完善及司法實踐等的不足,檢察人員自身等方面存在的一些問題,使得檢察機關的公訴人員在行使公訴權的過程中,存在的濫用的可能,需要對公訴權進行制約,公訴制度仍然存在著不足和不完善的地方。西方國家在法治進程中,對于公訴人員的公訴權的行使,也建立了一些相應的制度,設立了預審程序、中間程序、強制起訴制度等制度來對公訴權進行規(guī)制,以達到維護當事人權利的目的。而對于我國公訴權濫用的現(xiàn)狀,以及我國公訴制度亟待完善的問題,我們在借鑒國外公訴制度的同時,根據(jù)我國現(xiàn)行的法律特點及我國的司法實踐現(xiàn)狀,建立與我國法律相適應的公訴制度。根據(jù)現(xiàn)實需要通過法律來建立相應的不起訴聽證制度、不起訴說理制度及人民監(jiān)督員制度等相關制度,解決公訴制度中存在的問題,來推動我國公訴制度的改革與發(fā)展,使得檢察機關真正的發(fā)揮公訴權能的作用。
[Abstract]:The right of public prosecution, as the representative organ of the state, plays an important role in punishing crimes, protecting human rights and promoting the construction of socialist rule of law. It is of great significance to maintain the judicial credibility of procuratorial organs and promote the establishment of a socialist society ruled by law. The effective establishment of the public prosecution system can promote the effective exercise of the right of public prosecution. Scholars have also put forward some suggestions to promote the development of the public prosecution system. However, due to the defects of the current laws and regulations, the defects of the current laws and regulations, and the shortcomings of judicial practice and so on, scholars have put forward some suggestions for promoting the development of the public prosecution system. Some problems existing in the procuratorial personnel themselves make it possible for the procuratorial personnel to abuse the right of prosecution in the process of exercising the right of public prosecution, which requires the restriction of the right of public prosecution. In the process of rule of law, in western countries, some corresponding systems have been established for the exercise of the public prosecution right of public prosecutors, and the pretrial procedure and intermediate procedure have been established. The system of compulsory prosecution is used to regulate the right of public prosecution in order to protect the rights of the parties. However, the current situation of abuse of the right of public prosecution in our country and the urgent problems of the system of public prosecution in our country need to be improved. While drawing lessons from the public prosecution system of foreign countries, according to the current legal characteristics of our country and the present situation of judicial practice in our country, we establish the public prosecution system adapted to the law of our country, and establish the corresponding non-prosecution hearing system through the law according to the actual needs. In order to promote the reform and development of the public prosecution system in our country, the procuratorial organs can really play the role of public prosecution right by solving the problems existing in the public prosecution system and other related systems, such as the system of non-prosecution reasoning and the system of the people's supervisors.
【學位授予單位】:青島大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:D926.3
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 姚珊;;關于認罪認罰制度下刑事速裁程序的探究[J];法制與經(jīng)濟;2017年04期
2 胡巖;;大陪審團:制約公訴權的司法民主制度[J];法律適用;2016年06期
3 陳衛(wèi)東;;認罪認罰從寬制度研究[J];中國法學;2016年02期
4 吳宏耀;;我國公訴制度的功能檢討與優(yōu)化[J];人民檢察;2016年01期
5 張永進;;德國檢察官辦案責任制及其啟示[J];德國研究;2015年03期
6 張兆松;;主任檢察官制度若干基本問題研究[J];法治研究;2015年05期
7 左衛(wèi)民;;未完成的變革 刑事庭前會議實證研究[J];中外法學;2015年02期
8 李德進;;論重復追訴程序在我國的適用[J];人民論壇;2013年08期
9 陳衛(wèi)東;;人民監(jiān)督員制度的困境與出路[J];政法論壇;2012年04期
10 何繼清;章佳華;張海強;;公訴權運行機制改革和完善的徑路[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬);2012年04期
相關碩士學位論文 前4條
1 胡心婷;主任檢察官制度改革研究[D];華東政法大學;2015年
2 劉潔馨;我國撤回公訴制度研究[D];四川省社會科學院;2013年
3 任培培;我國公訴權制約機制研究[D];內蒙古大學;2012年
4 馮寧;我國公訴制度改革研究[D];中國政法大學;2011年
,本文編號:1595411
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1595411.html