本文選題：司法產(chǎn)品　切入點(diǎn)：公共物品　出處：《北方法學(xué)》2016年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：司法產(chǎn)品并不必然就是公共物品,司法服務(wù)也非必須由政府提供。歷史上,政府司法首先是作為統(tǒng)治者的創(chuàng)收手段發(fā)展起來的,而非公共服務(wù)。市場或社區(qū)自身也能夠提供非政府的糾紛解決機(jī)制。政府司法并不天然優(yōu)于非政府司法。對于大量不具有公共物品屬性的案件,非政府司法能夠提供更有效率的服務(wù)。當(dāng)事人的選擇自由和競爭機(jī)制是非政府司法有效運(yùn)作的關(guān)鍵。這一機(jī)制適用于公共法院,也就是當(dāng)事人合意選擇公共法官制度。后者可能對我國當(dāng)下的司法改革具有特殊的政策意義。
[Abstract]:Judicial products are not necessarily public goods, and judicial services do not have to be provided by the government. Historically, government justice has developed first as a means of generating income for rulers. And non-public services. The market or the community itself can also provide non-governmental dispute resolution mechanisms. Government justice is not naturally superior to non-governmental justice. For a large number of cases that do not have the attributes of public goods, The ability of non-governmental justice to provide more efficient services... the parties' freedom of choice and competition mechanisms are key to the effective functioning of non-governmental justice... this mechanism applies to public courts, The latter may have special policy significance to the current judicial reform in our country.
【作者單位】： 山東大學(xué)(威海)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：山東省哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)規(guī)劃項目“經(jīng)濟(jì)分析方法在司法中的應(yīng)用研究”(項目編號13DFXJ04)的階段性成果
【分類號】：D926
，

本文編號：1577671