本文選題：英國(guó)　切入點(diǎn)：法律職業(yè)　出處：《天津師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在歐洲大陸,大學(xué)長(zhǎng)久以來(lái)被當(dāng)作法律教育的基地,承擔(dān)著絕大部分法律教育的任務(wù),但是這種觀念在英國(guó)并不適用。從中世紀(jì)晚期到近代早期,律師公會(huì)壟斷了英國(guó)的法律職業(yè)教育,成為培養(yǎng)法律從業(yè)者的主要場(chǎng)所,并藉此享有英國(guó)"第三所大學(xué)"的美譽(yù)。律師公會(huì)發(fā)展出一套獨(dú)特的學(xué)徒制教育模式,對(duì)英國(guó)15世紀(jì)中期至17世紀(jì)早期法律人才的培養(yǎng)居功至偉。本文由緒論、正文和結(jié)語(yǔ)三部分組成:緒論闡述本文選題緣由,梳理學(xué)界對(duì)近代以前律師公會(huì)的研究狀況,翻譯及界定本文所涉及的"律師公會(huì)"和"法律從業(yè)者"等基本概念。正文分為三個(gè)章節(jié)。第一章主要闡明律師公會(huì)興起的歷史背景以及四大律師公會(huì)和預(yù)備律師公會(huì)的概況。亨利二世的司法改革對(duì)普通法的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展有重要影響,統(tǒng)一的中央司法機(jī)構(gòu)的確立則催生了英國(guó)中世紀(jì)法律職業(yè)階層。律師公會(huì)產(chǎn)生于14世紀(jì)初,但當(dāng)時(shí)尚未具備對(duì)法律從業(yè)者的培養(yǎng)教育職能。第二章為本文重點(diǎn)。15世紀(jì)中期至17世紀(jì)前期是律師公會(huì)進(jìn)行法律教育的成熟期,形成了學(xué)徒制的法律從業(yè)者培養(yǎng)模式。本章主要闡述律師公會(huì)的準(zhǔn)入條件和人員構(gòu)成、法律教育模式和方法、"大學(xué)式"教育以及律師公會(huì)學(xué)徒的從業(yè)流向等四個(gè)方面。第三章采用比較法,在總結(jié)律師公會(huì)學(xué)徒制培養(yǎng)模式的主要特征及其后期衰落的基礎(chǔ)上,通過(guò)對(duì)比同時(shí)期英國(guó)牛津大學(xué)的"學(xué)院制"法律從業(yè)者培養(yǎng)模式,分析二者在教育內(nèi)容、培養(yǎng)目標(biāo)等諸多方面的異同。結(jié)語(yǔ)總結(jié)全文,闡述筆者對(duì)15至17世紀(jì)英國(guó)法律從業(yè)者培養(yǎng)模式的認(rèn)識(shí)以及本文對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)代法律教育模式的借鑒意義。
[Abstract]:In continental Europe, universities have long been used as a base for legal education, undertaking most of the tasks of legal education, but this concept does not apply in England. From the late Middle Ages to the early modern times, The Law Society has monopolized the legal profession in the United Kingdom and become the main place for the training of legal practitioners, and thus enjoys the reputation of "the third university" in England. The Law Society has developed a unique model of apprenticeship education. This paper is composed of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion: the introduction explains the reason of choosing this topic, combs the research status of the law association before modern times. Translation and definition of the basic concepts of "Bar Association" and "Law Practitioners" in this paper. The text is divided into three chapters. The first chapter expounds the historical background of the Law Society's rise and the four bar associations and the law of preparation. An overview of the Hong Kong Teachers' Association. Henry II's judicial reform had an important impact on the emergence and development of the common law. The establishment of a unified central judiciary gave birth to the medieval English legal profession. The Bar Association was born in early 14th century. The second chapter focuses on the maturation period of the Law Society from the middle of the 15th century to the early 17th century. This chapter mainly expounds the admission conditions and personnel composition of the Bar Association. The mode and method of legal education, "university-style" education and the direction of the apprenticeship of the Bar Association. Chapter three adopts comparative method, on the basis of summing up the main characteristics of the apprenticeship training model of the Bar Association and its later decline. By comparing the training mode of "college system" legal practitioners in Oxford University of England in the same period, this paper analyzes the similarities and differences between them in many aspects, such as educational contents, training objectives and so on. This paper expounds the author's understanding of the training mode of British legal practitioners from 15 to 17th century and the significance of this paper to the modern legal education model in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：天津師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D956.1;DD916.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 朱聞;試析13-16世紀(jì)英格蘭律師階層與法律學(xué)徒的身份轉(zhuǎn)變[D];華東師范大學(xué);2011年

2 劉云箭;職業(yè)律師對(duì)司法的影響[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2010年

3 應(yīng)蔚蕓;英國(guó)法律會(huì)館盛衰之探析[D];華東政法大學(xué);2008年

4 宮艷麗;英國(guó)律師階層的興起（1560-1640）[D];武漢大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號(hào)：1576933