本文關(guān)鍵詞： 法庭 公開審判 媒體 網(wǎng)絡(luò) 輿論 公共關(guān)系　出處：《復(fù)旦大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：審判經(jīng)歷了長(zhǎng)期歷史演變逐漸形成了被民主社會(huì)公認(rèn)的公開透明、群眾可以參與監(jiān)督的現(xiàn)代模式。而網(wǎng)絡(luò)直播庭審模式的出現(xiàn)打破了傳統(tǒng)法庭審判空間和時(shí)間的限制,將庭審現(xiàn)場(chǎng)信息的傳播范圍放大到近乎沒有邊界。本文將通過(guò)以下四個(gè)部分分析闡述網(wǎng)絡(luò)直播庭審的利弊得失和今后的規(guī)范及發(fā)展。 第一部分內(nèi)容是由當(dāng)前網(wǎng)絡(luò)直播庭審實(shí)踐引出話題,通過(guò)相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)并結(jié)合國(guó)外經(jīng)驗(yàn)和公開審判的發(fā)展的歷程,引出網(wǎng)絡(luò)直播庭審話題即它給公開審判帶來(lái)了正反兩方面影響(第一章、第二章)； 第二部分是從理論上分析網(wǎng)絡(luò)自身的特征和網(wǎng)絡(luò)直播對(duì)庭審帶來(lái)的正面價(jià)值,肯定網(wǎng)絡(luò)直播對(duì)擴(kuò)大庭審監(jiān)督、提高審判水準(zhǔn)和普及法制教育的重要意義(第三章)； 第三部分是結(jié)合案例探討針對(duì)網(wǎng)絡(luò)直播庭審的爭(zhēng)議包括程序合法性問(wèn)題、適用范圍問(wèn)題、輿論影響問(wèn)題、對(duì)當(dāng)事人名譽(yù)造成的影響等,并總結(jié)這些爭(zhēng)議觸動(dòng)到的相關(guān)利益本質(zhì)(第四章)； 第四部分是研究如何通過(guò)立法與機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置等手段來(lái)規(guī)范運(yùn)用網(wǎng)絡(luò)直播庭審,緩解相關(guān)正義、降低負(fù)面影響,使其價(jià)值得到最大限度的發(fā)揮(第五章)。 網(wǎng)絡(luò)作為新興的信息媒介,其本身的最大特性在于傳播的廣泛性、即時(shí)性、互動(dòng)性和不易監(jiān)控性。本文旨在通過(guò)對(duì)上述四部分內(nèi)容的闡述找到駕馭網(wǎng)絡(luò)直播庭審這個(gè)新事物的方法,最終期待徇私枉法情況的減少,國(guó)民法制意識(shí)趨于健全從而平息社會(huì)戾氣。
[Abstract]:The trial has experienced a long historical evolution and gradually formed the modern mode of openness and transparency, which is recognized by democratic society, and the mass can participate in the supervision, while the appearance of the webcast trial mode breaks the limitation of the traditional court trial space and time. This paper will expound the advantages and disadvantages of the webcast hearing through the following four parts and explain the future standard and development. The first part of the content is from the current webcast trial practice leads to the topic, through the relevant data and combined with foreign experience and the development of public trial process, It leads to the topic of webcast trial, that is, it brings both positive and negative effects to the public trial (Chapter one, Chapter two); The second part is the theoretical analysis of the characteristics of the network itself and the positive value of the network broadcast to the trial, affirming the significance of the network broadcast in expanding the supervision of the trial, improving the trial level and popularizing the legal education (Chapter 3); The third part is to discuss the disputes about the webcast trial including the legality of the procedure, the scope of application, the influence of public opinion, the impact on the reputation of the parties and so on. And summed up the nature of the relevant interests touched by these disputes (Chapter 4th); The 4th part is to study how to standardize the use of webcast trial through legislation and institutional setting, to alleviate the relevant justice, reduce the negative impact, so that its value can be maximized (Chapter 5th). As a new information medium, the most important characteristic of the network itself lies in the universality and immediacy of communication. Interactive and not easy to monitor. This paper aims to find a way to harness the new thing of webcast trial through the elaboration of the above four parts, and finally look forward to the reduction of the situation of bending the law for favoritism. The consciousness of national legal system tends to perfect, thus quell social hostility.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D916.2;G206

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 何海波;;何以合法? 對(duì)“二奶繼承案”的追問(wèn)[J];中外法學(xué);2009年03期

2 張新寶,康長(zhǎng)慶;名譽(yù)權(quán)案件審理的情況、問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1997年03期

3 程味秋,周士敏;論審判公開[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);1998年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：1555265