本文關(guān)鍵詞： 司法鑒定 濫用司法鑒定 專家輔助人制度　出處：《揚州大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：盡管人們對司法鑒定的概念持有不同的觀點,但是,司法鑒定制度所具備的獨特的制度價值在現(xiàn)代社會得到了極大的認可和重視,司法鑒定的價值合理性毋庸置疑,司法鑒定在訴訟活動中為實現(xiàn)人類的正義價值和效率價值做出了不可磨滅的貢獻。然而,正是在其價值合理性的光環(huán)下,司法實踐中具體到個案卻出現(xiàn)了大量濫用司法鑒定的現(xiàn)象,嚴重浪費了司法資源,影響了司法的公平、公正和效率。這其中有當事人方面的原因、司法鑒定機構(gòu)和鑒定人方面的原因、司法機關(guān)和司法工作人員方面的原因,而更深層次的原因是司法鑒定體制、制度和立法方面的原因。為了解決濫用司法鑒定問題,微觀上需要構(gòu)建和完善一系列具體的制度,如：加強法院內(nèi)部的鑒定管理和考核機制；嚴格執(zhí)行當事人協(xié)商確定鑒定機構(gòu)和鑒定人制度；嚴格執(zhí)行鑒定人對鑒定事項施行專業(yè)對口制度；建立統(tǒng)一完善的司法鑒定標準;嚴格實行對鑒定材料給予當事人交換、質(zhì)證和異議申辯制度；嚴格實行將鑒定費和出庭費分別列支對鑒定人加以約束制度；完善專家輔助人制度；嚴格實行司法鑒定期限管理制度；嚴格實行司法鑒定質(zhì)量和效率評估制度；嚴格建立健全補充鑒定和重新鑒定審查標準制度；嚴格實行鑒定人出庭接受質(zhì)詢鑒定意見受到相關(guān)法律責任約束制度等。宏觀上更要完善司法鑒定管理制度,既要做好司法鑒定行政管理工作,如：統(tǒng)一司法鑒定行政管理體制、加強對司法鑒定機構(gòu)、司法鑒定人的行政管理,同時需健全司法鑒定行業(yè)管理制度,發(fā)揮司法鑒定人協(xié)會這一自治性社會團體的職能。總之,解決濫用司法鑒定問題是一個系統(tǒng)工程,既需要設(shè)計完善的具體制度,又需要宏觀思維的把握,現(xiàn)有的法律框架很難協(xié)調(diào)解決,統(tǒng)一的《司法鑒定法》的制定將是最終解決方案。
[Abstract]:Although people hold different views on the concept of judicial expertise, the unique institutional value of judicial expertise system has been greatly recognized and valued in modern society, and the value of judicial expertise is undoubtedly reasonable. Judicial expertise has made an indelible contribution to the realization of the value of justice and efficiency of human beings in the litigation activities. However, it is under the halo of rationality of its value that the judicial expertise has made an indelible contribution to the realization of human justice and efficiency. In judicial practice, however, a large number of abuses of judicial expertise appear in specific cases, which seriously waste judicial resources and affect the fairness, fairness and efficiency of the administration of justice. There are reasons for the parties concerned. The reasons for forensic agencies and experts, the reasons for judicial organs and judicial staff, and the deeper reasons for the system, system and legislation of judicial expertise... in order to solve the problem of abuse of judicial expertise, At the micro level, a series of concrete systems should be constructed and perfected, such as strengthening the appraisal management and appraisal mechanism within the court, strictly enforcing the parties' consultation to determine the appraisal institution and expert system; Strictly carry out the expert counterpart system for the appraisal matters; establish a unified and perfect standard for judicial identification; strictly implement the system of exchanging, cross-examining and disagreeing on the appraisal materials; Strictly carry out the system of restricting the appraiser separately from the appraisal fee and the court fee; perfect the expert assistant person system; strictly carry out the management system of the judicial appraisal period; strictly carry out the appraisal system of the quality and efficiency of the judicial expertise; Strictly establish and improve the standard system of supplementary identification and re-appraisal examination; strictly implement the system of experts appearing before the court for questioning and appraisal opinions subject to relevant legal responsibilities; and so on. At the macro level, it is even more necessary to improve the management system of judicial expertise. It is necessary to do a good job in the administrative management of judicial expertise, such as unifying the administrative management system of judicial expertise, strengthening the administration of judicial identification institutions and judicial experts, and improving the system of management of the judicial expertise industry at the same time, In short, to solve the problem of abuse of judicial expertise is a systematic project, which requires the design of perfect concrete system and the grasp of macroscopic thinking. It is difficult to coordinate the existing legal framework, and the formulation of the uniform Forensic expertise Law will be the final solution.
【學位授予單位】：揚州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹詩權(quán);司法鑒定模式的現(xiàn)狀與改革[J];中國司法;2002年01期

2 霍憲丹;郭華;;司法鑒定制度改革的邏輯反思與路徑探究[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2010年01期

3 霍憲丹;;關(guān)于司法鑒定體制改革的實踐與探索[J];證據(jù)科學;2007年Z1期

4 邢學毅;;論在醫(yī)療糾紛訴訟中推行專家輔助人制度[J];證據(jù)科學;2009年03期

5 汪建成;;司法鑒定基礎(chǔ)理論研究[J];法學家;2009年04期

6 潘溪;;論司法鑒定的多頭鑒定、重復鑒定問題[J];江蘇警官學院學報;2008年02期

7 汪建成,吳江;司法鑒定基本理論之再檢討[J];法學論壇;2002年05期

8 張玉鑲;司法鑒定學基本概念研究[J];中國司法鑒定;2001年01期

9 何家弘,劉昊陽;完善司法鑒定制度是科學證據(jù)時代的呼喚[J];中國司法鑒定;2001年01期

10 李禹;商潔;;關(guān)于建立和完善司法鑒定統(tǒng)一管理體制的調(diào)研報告[J];中國司法鑒定;2009年01期

，

本文編號：1553180