發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-01 09:17

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 能動司法 司法能動主義 司法規(guī)制　出處：《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在西方，司法能動主義有著久遠(yuǎn)的歷史，學(xué)術(shù)界對司法能動主義的研究成果也日益豐碩，但是對于我國能動司法卻仍然沒有一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的界定，現(xiàn)階段，能動司法正式成為我國司法的主流話題，因而引發(fā)了學(xué)術(shù)界和實(shí)務(wù)界熱烈的探討，也出現(xiàn)了百家爭鳴的局面�！澳軇铀痉ā迸c西方語境中的“司法能動主義”之間，存在一定聯(lián)系，部分理念也有重合，但從基本內(nèi)涵與核心價(jià)值訴求等本質(zhì)問題上看卻有天壤之別。兩者在語詞使用上的關(guān)系，具有分析哲學(xué)提出的“家族相似性”特征——形似而質(zhì)異——具有相似性而絕非共同性。由于我國的司法環(huán)境和憲政體制與西方國家有很大不同,故而我國的能動司法和西方的司法能動主義在歷史背景、適用范圍、適用方式、基本特征上都有不同，有自己獨(dú)特的語境和現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)。 在我國，能動司法要求司法機(jī)關(guān)在司法過程中，綜合考量政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化等各種社會因素，靈活地創(chuàng)造性地適用法律，化解社會糾紛，推動社會經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、文化、法律等的變革與發(fā)展，實(shí)現(xiàn)法的價(jià)值目標(biāo)。能動司法能夠在我國存在，而且受到重視與推崇的重要原因是其在體現(xiàn)并維護(hù)著諸如秩序、效率、正義、人權(quán)等價(jià)值的同時(shí)，在運(yùn)行過程中也發(fā)揮著實(shí)現(xiàn)法律效果與社會效果的統(tǒng)一、司法權(quán)威的塑造、積累立法和司法改革的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和緩解社會矛盾的功效。但是，司法有著被動性與中立性的特征，因此在我國必須謹(jǐn)慎適度能動司法，嚴(yán)守邊界，理性實(shí)踐。 本文旨在揭示能動司法的理論基礎(chǔ),探尋其實(shí)踐進(jìn)路。為了能更好的探討這個(gè)問題,本文分為四個(gè)部分：第一部分主要介紹能動司法的一般理論，對能動司法的內(nèi)涵、本質(zhì)屬性、基本特征等做一個(gè)概括的敘述，并結(jié)合與西方司法能動主義的比較，系統(tǒng)的對我國能動司法的基本問題做了深入的論述。第二部分主要從法的價(jià)值入手，揭示能動司法的價(jià)值追求，充分闡述能動司法不但沒有顛覆傳統(tǒng)司法理念的基本價(jià)值，反而深化了傳統(tǒng)司法理念的價(jià)值取向。能動司法既得到社會的普遍認(rèn)同，又符合了客觀上對其合理性合法性的要求。第三部分論述了能動司法規(guī)制的必要性，能動司法的盛行隨之帶來的一些過度司法現(xiàn)象為社會及司法帶來了危害，必須采取相應(yīng)措施予以糾正。第四部分主要尋求能動司法的限度，從司法受制原理出發(fā)，通過結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)階段司法基本國情，找出一個(gè)合理的邊界，通過對能動司法主體及內(nèi)容的規(guī)制，防止司法權(quán)的濫用,從而使能動司法這一司法理念更好的為社會主義法制建設(shè)服務(wù)。
[Abstract]:In the West, judicial activism has a long history, and academic research on judicial activism has become increasingly fruitful, but there is still no unified definition of active justice in our country. The active judicature has become the mainstream topic of our country's judicature, which has aroused the heated discussion in the academic and practical circles, and has also appeared the situation of a hundred schools of thought contending, between "active judicature" and "judicial activism" in the western context. There is a certain connection, some ideas also overlap, but from the basic connotation and core value demands and other essential issues, there is a world of difference, the relationship between the two in the use of words, It has the characteristics of "family similarity" proposed by analytical philosophy-similar in shape but different in quality-similar but not commonality. Because of the judicial environment and constitutional system of our country are very different from those of western countries. Therefore, the active judicature in our country and the judicial activism in the west are different in historical background, scope of application, mode of application, basic characteristics, and have their own unique context and realistic foundation. In our country, the active administration of justice requires the judicial organs to synthetically consider political, economic, cultural and other social factors, apply the law flexibly and creatively, resolve social disputes, and promote social economy, politics and culture. The reform and development of law and the realization of the value goal of law. Active justice can exist in our country, and the important reason why it is valued and respected is that it embodies and maintains the values such as order, efficiency, justice, human rights and so on. In the process of operation, it also plays an important role in realizing the unification of legal effect and social effect, shaping judicial authority, accumulating experience in legislation and judicial reform and alleviating social contradictions. However, justice has the characteristics of passivity and neutrality. Therefore, in our country, we must be cautious and moderately active judicial, strictly observe the boundary, rational practice. This paper aims to reveal the theoretical basis of active justice and explore its practical approach. In order to better explore this problem, this paper is divided into four parts: the first part mainly introduces the general theory of active justice, and the connotation of active justice. The essential attribute, the basic characteristic and so on make a summary narration, and unifies with the western judicial activism comparison, has made the thorough elaboration to our country active judicature basic question. The second part mainly starts from the law value, It reveals the value pursuit of active justice, fully expounds that active justice not only does not subvert the basic value of traditional judicial idea, but also deepens the value orientation of traditional judicial idea. The third part discusses the necessity of active judicial regulation, and some excessive judicial phenomena brought by the prevalence of active judicature bring harm to the society and judicature. It is necessary to take corresponding measures to correct it. Part 4th mainly seeks for the limits of active judicature, proceeding from the principle of judicial restriction, by combining the basic conditions of our country's current judicial situation, to find out a reasonable boundary. Through the regulation of active judicial subject and content, the abuse of judicial power is prevented, so that the judicial concept of active judicature can better serve the construction of socialist legal system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張榕;;司法能動性何以實(shí)現(xiàn)?——以最高人民法院司法解釋為分析基礎(chǔ)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年05期

2 范愉;;訴前調(diào)解與法院的社會責(zé)任 從司法社會化到司法能動主義[J];法律適用;2007年11期

3 董v，

本文編號：1551309