本文關(guān)鍵詞： 司法確認(rèn) 人民調(diào)解 人民調(diào)解協(xié)議 渭源縣　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：渭源縣是司法確認(rèn)制度的最初試驗地,從2007年開始試點到寫入人民調(diào)解法、民事訴訟法,司法確認(rèn)制度在立法上不斷完善和成熟,已成為我國的一項重要司法制度。但渭源縣人民調(diào)解和司法確認(rèn)的數(shù)據(jù)表明,司法確認(rèn)制度在司法實踐中的運行情況并不盡如人意,表現(xiàn)為制度運行以來,法院受理的民商事糾紛案件數(shù)量不降反增,辦理司法確認(rèn)案件給法院增加了額外的負(fù)擔(dān),面臨著制度價值難以實現(xiàn)的困境。究其原因,既有來自制度層面的,也有來自實踐層面的。制度層面的原因有：申請司法確認(rèn)的調(diào)解過于苛刻,對司法確認(rèn)程序的規(guī)定不明確,確認(rèn)結(jié)果有可能阻礙人民調(diào)解協(xié)議獲得強制執(zhí)行力的機會,司法確認(rèn)制度難以突破人民調(diào)解協(xié)議性質(zhì)的局限性。實踐層面的原因有：人民調(diào)解制度尚不健全,調(diào)確對接渠道不暢通,行政力量的不當(dāng)介入等。針對上述原因,本文從完善制度設(shè)計與規(guī)范實踐操作兩個方面入手,提出了若干建議：首先從立法層面上彌補司法確認(rèn)制度文本規(guī)定上的空缺,建議放寬申請司法確認(rèn)的條件,明確司法確認(rèn)的程序,對法院不予確認(rèn)的建立轉(zhuǎn)換程序,明晰人民調(diào)解協(xié)議的效力屬性；其次在實踐操作中要規(guī)范人民調(diào)解,暢通調(diào)確對接渠道,規(guī)范行政力量的介入。
[Abstract]:Weiyuan County is the initial experimental site of the judicial confirmation system, from 2007 to the trial of the people's mediation law, civil procedure law, judicial confirmation system in the legislation of continuous improvement and maturity, It has become an important judicial system in our country. However, the data of people's mediation and judicial confirmation in Weiyuan County show that the operation of judicial confirmation system in judicial practice is not satisfactory. The number of civil and commercial disputes accepted by the court has increased rather than decreased, and the handling of judicial confirmation cases has added an extra burden to the court, and it is facing a dilemma that the value of the system is difficult to realize. There are also reasons from the level of practice. The reasons of system level are: the mediation of applying for judicial confirmation is too harsh, the regulation of judicial confirmation procedure is not clear, and the confirmation result may hinder the people's mediation agreement to obtain the opportunity of compulsory execution. It is difficult for the judicial confirmation system to break through the limitations of the nature of the people's mediation agreement. The reasons in practice are: the people's mediation system is not perfect, the channels of mediation and docking are not smooth, the improper intervention of the administrative forces, and so on. This paper starts with perfecting the system design and standardizing the practical operation, and puts forward some suggestions: first, to make up for the vacancy in the text of judicial confirmation system from the legislative level, and to relax the conditions of applying for judicial confirmation. Make clear the procedure of judicial confirmation, establish the conversion procedure for the court not to confirm, clarify the validity attribute of the people's mediation agreement; secondly, standardize the people's mediation in practice, unblocked the docking channel, standardize the intervention of the administrative force.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 李勇;;淺析人民調(diào)解員隊伍建設(shè)——以成都市龍泉驛區(qū)為例[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2012年10期

2 徐永偉;;關(guān)于建立專職人民調(diào)解員制度的思考[J];中國司法;2009年06期

3 范愉;;訴前調(diào)解與法院的社會責(zé)任 從司法社會化到司法能動主義[J];法律適用;2007年11期

4 張華;趙可;;人民法院訴前調(diào)解制度的初步建構(gòu) 司法ADR模式訴前調(diào)解制度合理性、可操作性探究[J];法律適用;2007年11期

5 王亞新;;訴調(diào)對接和對調(diào)解協(xié)議的司法審查[J];法律適用;2010年06期

6 江偉,廖永安;簡論人民調(diào)解協(xié)議的性質(zhì)與效力[J];法學(xué)雜志;2003年02期

7 張永進;;人民調(diào)解協(xié)議司法確認(rèn)制度的思考——以《人民調(diào)解法》為藍本[J];法治論壇;2010年04期

8 王亞新;;《民事訴訟法》修改與調(diào)解協(xié)議的司法審查[J];清華法學(xué);2011年03期

9 楊雅妮;;訴外調(diào)解協(xié)議的“司法確認(rèn)”程序探析——以“和諧社會”構(gòu)建為背景的分析[J];青海社會科學(xué);2010年06期

，

本文編號：1548577