本文關(guān)鍵詞： 民意 司法 影響 應(yīng)對(duì)　出處：《蘇州大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：一般認(rèn)為,在民主國(guó)家,法律是由民意機(jī)關(guān)經(jīng)民主程序制定,法律是民意的一種體現(xiàn),司法部門作為適用法律的專職機(jī)關(guān)遵循法律、合乎民意地進(jìn)行判決。按照這樣一種邏輯理解,民意與司法之間應(yīng)當(dāng)并行不悖,而不應(yīng)當(dāng)存在對(duì)立與沖突。可是實(shí)際生活中所出現(xiàn)的案例卻表明民意與司法關(guān)系的真實(shí)狀態(tài)并非如此,民意與司法的緊張關(guān)系已經(jīng)在某些個(gè)案中突顯出來,兩者的對(duì)立和沖突使司法陷入兩難的困境,引發(fā)了在司法過程中如何對(duì)待民意之爭(zhēng)。 在這樣的背景下,本文通過對(duì)司法語(yǔ)境中民意的概念、形成及特征進(jìn)行概述分析,在對(duì)民意與司法關(guān)系演變的社會(huì)條件及基礎(chǔ)理論進(jìn)行闡釋的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)民意與司法的關(guān)系進(jìn)行了評(píng)判。在回答了民意影響司法“能或不能”、“應(yīng)不應(yīng)當(dāng)”實(shí)然與應(yīng)然兩個(gè)不同層面的問題后,探索司法對(duì)待民意的合理路徑。借助立法程序使民意能夠通過合法化的途徑進(jìn)入司法運(yùn)作中來,讓民意在一個(gè)可以控制的范圍內(nèi)活動(dòng),通過司法對(duì)民意的理性識(shí)別和回應(yīng),實(shí)現(xiàn)民意與司法的良性互動(dòng)。
[Abstract]:It is generally believed that in a democratic country, the law is formulated by the organs of public opinion through democratic procedures, and the law is a manifestation of public opinion. The judiciary, as the specialized organ that applies the law, follows the law. Adjudication in accordance with public opinion. According to such a logical understanding, public opinion and justice should go hand in hand, There should be no confrontation or conflict. However, the actual cases in real life show that the true state of the relationship between public opinion and justice is not the same, and the tension between public opinion and justice has been highlighted in some cases. The opposition and conflict between the two make the judicature in a dilemma, which leads to the dispute about how to deal with public opinion in the judicial process. In this context, this paper analyzes the concept, formation and characteristics of public opinion in the judicial context, on the basis of explaining the social conditions and basic theories of the evolution of the relationship between public opinion and justice. The relationship between public opinion and justice is judged. After answering the questions of whether public opinion affects justice "can or cannot", "should not" actually and ought to be, To explore a reasonable path for judicial treatment of public opinion. With the aid of legislative procedures, public opinion can enter the judicial operation through the way of legalization, so that public opinion can operate within a scope of control and rationally identify and respond to public opinion through the administration of justice. Realize the benign interaction between public opinion and judicature.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 田佳靈;;民意對(duì)司法裁判過程的影響[J];安徽職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

2 蘇力;;基層法院審判委員會(huì)制度的考察及思考[J];北大法律評(píng)論;1998年02期

3 劉昂;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意與司法的博弈——從沖突走向和諧[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

4 周亮亮;;大眾民意與司法判決[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年18期

5 袁應(yīng)武;;民意和法意之間——一則案例引發(fā)的思考[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年07期

6 歐燦輝;;民意浪潮與司法獨(dú)立相關(guān)問題淺析——對(duì)許霆一案的延伸思考[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年S2期

7 陳樹森;;博弈與和諧:穿行于法意與民意之間的司法[J];法律適用;2009年09期

8 張海玲;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿情之于審判權(quán):助推還是阻礙 以經(jīng)濟(jì)分析法為視角論法院網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿情應(yīng)對(duì)機(jī)制的完善[J];法律適用;2010年12期

9 汪習(xí)根;在沖突與和諧之間——對(duì)司法權(quán)本性的追問[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2005年05期

10 周永坤;;民意審判與審判元規(guī)則[J];法學(xué);2009年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：1527354