本文關(guān)鍵詞： 法院調(diào)解 原則 存在問(wèn)題 改革與完善建議　出處：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：法院調(diào)解是人民法院審理和解決民事糾紛的重要形式。是一種訴訟活動(dòng)。也是我國(guó)民事訴訟中最具中國(guó)特色的一項(xiàng)制度,被譽(yù)為根植于中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律文化的“東方經(jīng)驗(yàn)”,在解決糾紛的過(guò)程中發(fā)揮著十分重要的作用。然而,隨著市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展和廣大人民群眾法律素質(zhì)的不斷提高,傳統(tǒng)的法院調(diào)解機(jī)制已不能應(yīng)對(duì)數(shù)量不斷增加、種類日益繁多的民事糾紛,如何及時(shí)、徹底地解決民事權(quán)益爭(zhēng)議,提高解紛效率,減輕法院壓力,降低訴訟成本,促進(jìn)民商事審判的良性運(yùn)行,從而維護(hù)和諧的社會(huì)環(huán)境已是當(dāng)務(wù)之急。 本文通過(guò)分析我國(guó)法院調(diào)解原則,讓我們更好的把握法院調(diào)解的方向。通過(guò)分析法院調(diào)解的性質(zhì)與功能價(jià)值,使我們看到法院調(diào)解在現(xiàn)代社會(huì)中發(fā)揮著不可替代的作用。接著通過(guò)與國(guó)外相關(guān)制度的比較分析,有助于發(fā)現(xiàn)我國(guó)法院調(diào)解的不足,從而為后面如何完善提供可借鑒的寶貴經(jīng)驗(yàn)。最后通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)法院調(diào)解現(xiàn)狀及存在的問(wèn)題分析,進(jìn)一步表明了完善我國(guó)法院調(diào)解制度的必要性和緊迫性。在文章的最后一部分筆者重點(diǎn)分析如何完善我國(guó)的法院調(diào)解制度。
[Abstract]:Court mediation is an important form for people's courts to try and resolve civil disputes. It is a kind of litigation activity. It is also a system with Chinese characteristics in civil litigation in our country. The oriental experience, which is rooted in Chinese traditional legal culture, plays a very important role in the process of resolving disputes. However, with the development of market economy and the continuous improvement of the legal quality of the broad masses of the people, The traditional court mediation mechanism has been unable to cope with the increasing number of civil disputes and the increasing variety of civil disputes. How to resolve civil rights and interests disputes in a timely and thorough manner, improve the efficiency of resolving disputes, reduce court pressure and reduce litigation costs, It is urgent to promote the healthy operation of civil and commercial trials and to maintain a harmonious social environment. By analyzing the principles of court mediation in our country, this paper gives us a better understanding of the direction of court mediation, and analyzes the nature and function value of court mediation. It makes us see that the court mediation plays an irreplaceable role in modern society. Then through the comparative analysis with foreign related systems, it is helpful to find out the insufficiency of court mediation in our country. Finally, through the analysis of the current situation and existing problems of court mediation in China, In the last part of the article, the author focuses on how to perfect the court mediation system in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董曉軍;;基層法官心理壓力現(xiàn)狀分析和緩解對(duì)策研究[J];法律適用;2007年01期

2 齊樹潔;臺(tái)灣法院調(diào)解制度評(píng)析[J];法學(xué);1994年08期

3 張玉;我國(guó)法院調(diào)解制度的反思與改革[J];甘肅政法成人教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年04期

4 陳錦紅;法院調(diào)解改革構(gòu)想[J];河北法學(xué);2001年06期

5 熊躍敏;;和諧社會(huì)視野下法院調(diào)解的法理闡釋[J];河北法學(xué);2007年01期

6 陳鋒;;我國(guó)民事調(diào)解制度的現(xiàn)狀簡(jiǎn)析及改革淺見[J];懷化學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué));2006年03期

7 田亦川;;司法調(diào)解現(xiàn)狀分析與出路探微[J];今日南國(guó)(理論創(chuàng)新版);2009年05期

8 景漢朝,盧子娟;經(jīng)濟(jì)審判方式改革若干問(wèn)題研究[J];法學(xué)研究;1997年05期

9 李浩;調(diào)解的比較優(yōu)勢(shì)與法院調(diào)解制度的改革[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

10 范愉;調(diào)解的重構(gòu)(上)——以法院調(diào)解的改革為重點(diǎn)[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2004年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1525195