本文關(guān)鍵詞： 陪審團(tuán)制度 參審制 人民陪審員制度 程序　出處：《中國青年政治學(xué)院》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：陪審制度是普通民眾直接參與國家審判權(quán)力的表現(xiàn)形式，可分為英美法系的陪審團(tuán)制度和大陸法系的參審制，我國人民陪審制度在性質(zhì)上也屬于參審制。參審制國家在司法實(shí)踐中遇到諸多問題，我國也不例外，如何解決這些難題值得關(guān)注。每項制度的建立都有一個認(rèn)識、發(fā)展、成熟的過程，，程序作為陪審制度組成部分，是民眾實(shí)現(xiàn)審判權(quán)的工具。本文以對比研究方法、歸納總結(jié)方法對陪審的程序問題進(jìn)行分析，創(chuàng)新之處是以陪審員的特點(diǎn)為中心，為保證陪審員實(shí)質(zhì)性參與案件審判，在各個審判階段針對陪審員設(shè)置相應(yīng)的程序，尤其對一審陪審案件的上訴結(jié)構(gòu)進(jìn)行探究。從結(jié)構(gòu)上，本文引言部分對陪審制度的概念及選題做出簡要分析。之后的正文共分以下六個部分： 第一部分，首先對陪審制度的意義進(jìn)行分析，認(rèn)為陪審的功能主要表現(xiàn)為完善僵化的法律、促進(jìn)審判公正及增進(jìn)民眾對司法的理解，進(jìn)而提升法院的公信力三個方面。之后，明確本文研究的問題。 第二部分，對陪審團(tuán)制度和參審制模式各自特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行分析并通過技術(shù)設(shè)計和功能效果的對比，討論兩大法系適用不同審判模式的原因，從程序角度入手為解決我國人民陪審員制度存在的問題提供思路。 第三部分，充分的庭前準(zhǔn)備程序?yàn)榕銓弳T參與庭審打下良好的基礎(chǔ)，對什么條件下適用陪審，被告人是否具有啟動陪審的權(quán)利，被告人陪審選擇權(quán)的內(nèi)容，及陪審員宣誓程序等內(nèi)容進(jìn)行研究。 第四部分，庭審的好壞直接影響著審判質(zhì)量，如何使陪審員實(shí)質(zhì)性參與庭審是重要的問題。主要探討職業(yè)法官與陪審員在庭審中的關(guān)系，如何根據(jù)陪審員事實(shí)認(rèn)知的特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行庭審程序的安排，如何對案件評議、裁決，怎樣協(xié)調(diào)判決理由與陪審理念沖突等問題，進(jìn)而做出符合陪審員特點(diǎn)的改變。 第五部分，上訴制度具有糾正一審錯誤、統(tǒng)一法律適用及使被告人服判的價值，但上訴理念與陪審精神存在著沖突，對一審適用陪審的案件是否能提起上訴及上訴之后，二審程序應(yīng)如何做出相應(yīng)調(diào)整，是本部分研討的重要內(nèi)容。 第六部分，對全文進(jìn)行整體總結(jié)，程序?qū)ΡＷC陪審制度落實(shí)起著重要作用，但本文對陪審程序的討論還不夠全面深入，是以后研究的努力方向。
[Abstract]:The jury system is the manifestation of the ordinary people's direct participation in the national trial power. It can be divided into the jury system of the common law system and the civil law system. The people's jury system in our country belongs to the system of trial participation in nature. Countries that participate in the trial system encounter many problems in judicial practice, and our country is no exception. How to solve these problems is worthy of attention. The establishment of each system has an understanding and development. In the mature process, procedure, as part of jury system, is a tool for people to realize judicial power. In this paper, the author analyzes the procedural problems of jury by means of comparative research methods, and the innovation is centered on the characteristics of jurors. In order to ensure the jurors' substantial participation in the trial, the corresponding procedures are set up for jurors at each stage of the trial, especially the appeal structure of the jury cases of first instance. The introduction part of this paper makes a brief analysis of the concept and topic of jury system. The main body is divided into the following six parts:. In the first part, we analyze the significance of jury system, and think that the function of jury is to perfect the rigid law, to promote the justice of trial and to enhance the public's understanding of justice, and then to enhance the credibility of the court. Clarify the problems studied in this paper. In the second part, the author analyzes the characteristics of the jury system and the trial system, and discusses the reasons why the two legal systems apply different trial modes through the comparison of the technical design and the functional effects. From the point of view of procedure, it provides ideas for solving the problems existing in the system of people's assessors in our country. The third part, the full pretrial preparation procedure for jurors to participate in the trial to lay a good foundation, under what conditions applicable jury, whether the defendant has the right to initiate jury, the defendant jury option content, And jury oath procedures and other content to study. In the 4th part, the quality of the trial directly affects the quality of the trial. How to make the jurors participate in the trial is an important issue. This paper mainly discusses the relationship between the professional judges and the jurors in the trial. How to arrange the trial procedure according to the characteristics of jurors' cognition of facts, how to judge the cases, how to decide, how to coordinate the conflict between the reasons of judgment and the jury concept, and then make the changes that accord with the characteristics of jurors. In 5th, the appellate system has the value of correcting the mistakes of the first instance, unifying the application of the law and making the defendant serve the sentence, but there is a conflict between the idea of appeal and the spirit of the jury, and whether or not the case applicable to the jury in the first instance can be appealed or not, and after the appeal, How to adjust the procedure of second instance is an important part of this part. In the 6th part, the whole paper is summarized, the procedure plays an important role in ensuring the implementation of the jury system, but the discussion of the jury procedure in this paper is not comprehensive and deep enough, which is the direction of the future research.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國青年政治學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張光杰,王慶廷;歷史、現(xiàn)狀、未來——對我國陪審制度的法理解讀[J];北華大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年03期

2 李昌道,董茂云;陪審制度比較研究[J];比較法研究;2003年01期

3 李瑞霞;張曉紅;;淺談我國的陪審制度[J];研究生法學(xué);2004年02期

4 施鵬鵬;;法國參審制:歷史、制度與特色[J];東方法學(xué);2011年02期

5 田口守一,丁相順;日本的陪審制度——"裁判員"制度[J];法律適用;2005年04期

6 段曉彥;俞榮根;;“陪審”一詞的西來與中譯[J];法學(xué)家;2010年01期

7 張德淼,周佑勇;論當(dāng)前我國實(shí)現(xiàn)司法正義的條件和途徑[J];法學(xué)評論;1999年01期

8 周永坤;;中國司法概念史研究[J];法治研究;2011年04期

9 劉永紅,任雪麗;略論證人宣誓制度不適宜我國[J];甘肅行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年02期

10 吳軍輝;;陪審團(tuán)制度在德國的移植與消亡[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年02期

本文編號：1522226