本文關(guān)鍵詞： 職務(wù)犯罪 審查逮捕權(quán) “上提一級(jí)”改革 制度缺陷 制度完善　出處：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：根據(jù)中央司法體制改革方案中關(guān)于改革和完善審查逮捕制度的要求,最高人民檢察院制定了《關(guān)于省級(jí)以下人民檢察院立案?jìng)刹榈陌讣缮弦患?jí)人民檢察院審查決定逮捕的規(guī)定(試行)》并于2009年9月正式下發(fā)執(zhí)行,原有職務(wù)犯罪案件審查逮捕權(quán)由立案的檢察機(jī)關(guān)行使變更為由上一級(jí)檢察機(jī)關(guān)行使。此項(xiàng)改革制度的實(shí)施,旨在強(qiáng)化職務(wù)犯罪偵查活動(dòng)的監(jiān)督制約、促進(jìn)依法查辦職務(wù)犯罪案件、切實(shí)保障犯罪嫌疑人的合法權(quán)益。此項(xiàng)改革運(yùn)行三年以來(lái),取得了一定的成效,但同時(shí)制度設(shè)置本身及相關(guān)配套機(jī)制的不足也隨之顯現(xiàn)。 在本文中,筆者就該項(xiàng)改革在實(shí)踐中的運(yùn)行情況進(jìn)行了分析,并提出了對(duì)完善改革的一些思考。本文主要分為三個(gè)部分進(jìn)行論述：第一部分,筆者對(duì)職務(wù)犯罪審查逮捕權(quán)改革的主要程序進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要的解讀,在對(duì)改革后湖南省人民檢察院的職務(wù)犯罪審查逮捕情況進(jìn)行分析、對(duì)司法工作實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的部分典型案例進(jìn)行例舉說(shuō)明的基礎(chǔ)上,總結(jié)了我國(guó)職務(wù)犯罪審查逮捕權(quán)改革三年以來(lái)的運(yùn)行基本情況；第二部分,筆者指出在改革的執(zhí)行中出現(xiàn)了部分市州院違規(guī)交辦案件以規(guī)避上級(jí)院監(jiān)督的情況,以及律師介入職務(wù)犯罪審查逮捕的相關(guān)程序設(shè)置不完善的問(wèn)題,在指出這些問(wèn)題的同時(shí)闡述了認(rèn)為應(yīng)當(dāng)完善相關(guān)程序設(shè)置的理由；第三部分,筆者針對(duì)本文第二部分改革制度存在的兩點(diǎn)缺陷,提出應(yīng)當(dāng)從明確人民檢察院級(jí)別管轄、違反級(jí)別管轄之程序性制裁和建立程序性裁判機(jī)制三個(gè)方面的內(nèi)容建立級(jí)別管轄程序性制裁機(jī)制；應(yīng)當(dāng)增強(qiáng)現(xiàn)有職務(wù)犯罪審查逮捕程序的開(kāi)放性,從設(shè)置告知程序、約見(jiàn)程序、律師意見(jiàn)及證據(jù)材料的審查和處理程序、審查結(jié)果的反饋程序等幾個(gè)方面全面完善改革關(guān)于律師介入的程序規(guī)定。
[Abstract]:According to the requirements of reforming and perfecting the system of arrest of the central judicial reform, the Supreme People's Procuratorate formulated the "Regulations on the provincial people's Procuratorate investigation of the case by the upper level people's Procuratorate decided to arrest the (Trial) > and in September 2009 formally issued, the original right of duty crime arrest by the prosecutor organs in exercising its right to change from the exercise of a procuratorial organ. The implementation of this reform, aimed at strengthening the duty crime investigation activities supervision, in accordance with the law to promote the investigating crimes committed, and effectively protect the legitimate rights of criminal suspects. Since the reform run for three years, and achieved certain results, but at the same time, the lack of institutional settings and the related mechanisms also appeared.
In this paper, the author should reform practice in operation are analyzed, and puts forward some thoughts on perfecting the reform. This paper is divided into three parts: the first part, the main procedures of duty crime review arrested right reform are explained to Jane, in carries on the analysis to the duty the crime review of the Hunan Provincial People's Procuratorate arrested after the reform, based on the example of some typical cases in the judicial practice, summarizes the basic situation of China's duty crime review arrest three years since the reform; the second part, the author pointed out that the reform in the execution of the part of the city state of illegal in order to avoid the case assigned by the superior Institute of supervision, and lawyers involved in the program review and arrest of duty crimes is not perfect, in that these problems at the same time. The thought that we should perfect the relevant procedures set for the third part, the author; two defects existed in the reform of system of the second part, we should clear level from the jurisdiction of the people's Procuratorate, the three aspects of procedural sanctions in violation of jurisdiction and establish procedural adjudication mechanism of the content level under the jurisdiction of the procedural sanction mechanism should be established to enhance the open; the existing crime review arrest procedure, from setting the informing procedure of appointment procedures, review and processing program counsel and evidence material, the results of the review of several aspects of a comprehensive improvement program feedback reforms on the lawyer's intervention procedures.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D926.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 許建麗;;自偵案件偵查監(jiān)督體系之完善[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年06期

2 邵鋒;;律師介入審查批捕階段的價(jià)值分析[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年34期

3 邢永杰;;審查逮捕程序改革運(yùn)行效果、問(wèn)題及完善對(duì)策[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2010年07期

4 盛宏文;;對(duì)職務(wù)犯罪案件審查逮捕程序改革的思考——兼評(píng)最高人民檢察院“批捕提級(jí)”的《規(guī)定》[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年05期

5 姚志清;王延祥;張少林;;改革和完善職務(wù)犯罪偵查監(jiān)督機(jī)制的設(shè)想[J];犯罪研究;2007年03期

6 印仕柏;;職務(wù)犯罪案件審查逮捕方式的審視與重構(gòu)[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2008年06期

7 王宗藝;;職務(wù)犯罪案件審查逮捕方式的重構(gòu)[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2009年07期

8 卓俊濤;;職務(wù)犯罪案件審查逮捕方式的改革和完善[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2009年09期

9 邵義祖;張少林;呂顥;;檢察機(jī)關(guān)自偵案件逮捕權(quán)上提一級(jí)問(wèn)題研究[J];政治與法律;2009年07期

10 李?yuàn)^飛;;司法解釋中的“非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則”被“虛置”的成因分析[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 張浩;職務(wù)犯罪審查逮捕權(quán)上提一級(jí)改革調(diào)研報(bào)告[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

2 李姝;職務(wù)犯罪案件審查逮捕決定權(quán)上提一級(jí)研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2011年

3 王秀文;職務(wù)犯罪案件審查逮捕權(quán)上提一級(jí)的調(diào)查及分析[D];山西大學(xué);2011年

4 汪良敏;我國(guó)刑事訴訟程序性制裁制度的建立和完善[D];安徽大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1502706