本文關(guān)鍵詞： 檢察官獨立 檢察一體 檢察改革　出處：《東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版)》2017年S1期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：我國檢察體系奉行檢察一體原則,在法律定位下檢察權(quán)運行的主體為人民檢察院,但在檢察實踐中檢察權(quán)具體運行卻是由檢察官來完成。立法與實踐的悖反,使得檢察官獨立運行檢察權(quán)成為當(dāng)下檢察權(quán)運行機制改革的重點。通過域外檢察權(quán)運行機制的考察,發(fā)現(xiàn)我國檢察官在行使檢察權(quán)中存在著檢察一體機制的不利制約、行政化管理模式的不當(dāng)干預(yù)和檢察官職務(wù)保障制度不完善等問題。筆者擬對這些現(xiàn)存問題進(jìn)行研究,探尋出適合我國檢察官獨立行使檢察權(quán)的正確路徑。
[Abstract]:China's procuratorial system pursues the principle of procuratorial integration, the legal orientation of procuratorial power under the main body for the people's Procuratorate, the prosecution in the procuratorial practice but the specific operation is right by the prosecutor to complete. The legislation and practice of the paradox of the prosecutor independent operation of procuratorial power has become the focus of the reform of procuratorial power operation mechanism through the investigation at the moment. The extraterritorial prosecutorial power operation mechanism, found that China's prosecutors had a negative restriction mechanism in the development of procuratorial procuratorial power, administrative management and improper intervention of the Prosecutor Office security system is not perfect. The author intends to study the problems, find out the right path for our country public procurator procuratorial the right to independence.

【作者單位】： 華東政法大學(xué)法律學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D926.3
【正文快照】： 我國憲法規(guī)定:“人民檢察院依照法律規(guī)定獨立行使檢察權(quán)”,按照法律規(guī)定,檢察院內(nèi)部實行“檢察長負(fù)責(zé)制和監(jiān)察委員民主集中制相結(jié)合的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)體制”[1],因而在刑事訴訟中,檢察權(quán)運行主體在名義上一直由人民檢察院承載,但是反觀我國的司法實踐,從取證偵查到起訴裁量,從蒞庭公訴到

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 ;檢察官法第41條關(guān)于辭退工作人員的規(guī)定[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號：1462765