本文關(guān)鍵詞： 傳媒監(jiān)督 司法獨(dú)立 公正 沖突　出處：《遼寧大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著科學(xué)技術(shù)的發(fā)展,傳媒技術(shù)發(fā)展越來越成熟,傳媒對司法活動的監(jiān)督表現(xiàn)的愈來愈重要,特別是網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳媒的發(fā)展,更加促進(jìn)了傳媒監(jiān)督功能的發(fā)揮。特別是現(xiàn)代社會,司法對于調(diào)解社會矛盾和爭端發(fā)揮著越來越重要的作用,而傳媒對司法的監(jiān)督進(jìn)一步促進(jìn)了司法的透明和公正,使司法審判更加的公正和廉明,但是由于傳媒發(fā)展的不成熟性,在對司法發(fā)揮促進(jìn)作用的同時(shí),也帶來了一部分的消極作用,例如2007年許霆案、杭州飆車案、鄧玉嬌案、彭宇案等等,這些案件無不顯示著媒體與司法越來越突出的關(guān)系。因此,對于一方面要保障傳媒監(jiān)督對司法活動的積極作用的同時(shí),又要避免其對司法帶來的一部分消極影響,這對于傳媒與司法關(guān)系問題的研究對司法實(shí)踐和司法理論都有著重要的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本文以傳媒監(jiān)督與司法公正為題,遵循從一般到特殊,理論聯(lián)系實(shí)踐的研究方法,探討傳媒監(jiān)督與司法公正的關(guān)系,以求實(shí)現(xiàn)兩者的對立統(tǒng)一,尋找兩者雙贏的結(jié)合點(diǎn)。并通過分析傳媒監(jiān)督與司法公正的關(guān)系,提出解決傳媒監(jiān)督與司法公正沖突關(guān)系的構(gòu)想,以實(shí)現(xiàn)傳媒監(jiān)督與司法公正的協(xié)調(diào)統(tǒng)一。本文共分為三大部分,其中第一部分概述了傳媒監(jiān)督與司法公正,分為了兩點(diǎn)即傳媒監(jiān)督與司法公正的概念、傳媒監(jiān)督與司法公正之間的統(tǒng)一關(guān)系,其中重點(diǎn)論述了兩者之間的統(tǒng)一關(guān)系；第二部分分析了傳媒監(jiān)督與司法公正的沖突,并分為三點(diǎn)即傳媒監(jiān)督與司法公正的沖突表現(xiàn)、傳媒監(jiān)督與司法公正發(fā)生沖突的原因、協(xié)調(diào)兩者關(guān)系的意義；第三部分主要論述了協(xié)調(diào)傳媒監(jiān)督與司法公正關(guān)系的構(gòu)想,分為了三點(diǎn)即限制媒體對司法的無限度介入、保障媒體監(jiān)督權(quán)的實(shí)現(xiàn)、增強(qiáng)公眾的法律意識。現(xiàn)階段我國正處于社會轉(zhuǎn)型的關(guān)鍵時(shí)期,傳媒監(jiān)督與司法公正的關(guān)系能否處理得當(dāng),關(guān)系到我國的社會民主法治建設(shè),使傳媒監(jiān)督能夠積極的發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的功能是我們必須而且急切需要解決的一個(gè)問題。通本文這三部分的論述,深入的研究了傳媒與司法在互動過程中產(chǎn)生的沖突關(guān)系,并通過分析沖突關(guān)系,提出了協(xié)調(diào)兩者關(guān)系的構(gòu)想,體現(xiàn)了本文研究的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義和理論意義。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology, the development of media technology is more and more mature, and the supervision of judicial activities is becoming more and more important, especially the development of network media. Especially in modern society, judicature plays a more and more important role in mediating social contradictions and disputes. The supervision of the media to the judiciary further promote the transparency and fairness of the judiciary, so that the judicial trial is more fair and honest, but due to the immature development of the media, it plays a promoting role in the administration of justice at the same time. Also brought part of the negative effects, such as 2007 Xu Ting case, Hangzhou drag racing case, Deng Yujiao case, Peng Yu case, and so on, these cases all show that the media and the judiciary increasingly prominent relationship. On the one hand to protect the positive role of media supervision on judicial activities, but also to avoid its negative impact on the judiciary. This is of great practical significance to the study of the relationship between the media and the judiciary. This paper focuses on media supervision and judicial justice, following from general to special. This paper discusses the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice in order to realize the unity of opposites and seek for a win-win combination of the two, and through the analysis of the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice. In order to realize the coordination and unification of media supervision and judicial justice, this paper is divided into three parts, the first part of which summarizes the media supervision and judicial justice. It is divided into two parts, that is, the concept of media supervision and judicial justice, and the unified relationship between media supervision and judicial justice. The second part analyzes the conflict between media supervision and judicial justice, which is divided into three parts: the conflict between media supervision and judicial justice, the causes of the conflict between media supervision and judicial justice, and the significance of coordinating the relationship between the two. The third part mainly discusses the concept of coordinating the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice, which is divided into three parts, that is, limiting the media's unlimited involvement in the judiciary and ensuring the realization of the media supervision right. At the present stage, our country is in the critical period of social transformation. Whether the relationship between media supervision and judicial justice can be properly handled is related to the construction of social democracy and the rule of law in our country. To enable the media supervision to play its due function is a problem that we must and urgently need to solve. This paper deeply studies the conflict relationship between the media and the judiciary in the process of interaction, and by analyzing the conflict relationship, puts forward the conception of coordinating the relationship between the two, which reflects the practical and theoretical significance of this study.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：G206;D926

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 尹冬華,孫俊;論輿論監(jiān)督權(quán)的制約[J];安康師專學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

2 徐凌云;;隱私權(quán)保護(hù)的法律構(gòu)建[J];安順學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年01期

3 侯健;;言論自由及其限度[J];北大法律評論;2000年02期

4 侯健;傳媒與司法的沖突及其調(diào)整──美國有關(guān)法律實(shí)踐評述[J];比較法研究;2001年01期

5 簡海燕;;媒體消息隱匿權(quán)初探[J];比較法研究;2008年05期

6 程德安;;發(fā)表權(quán)的行使與媒介的市場競爭[J];編輯之友;2006年04期

7 王龍s，

本文編號：1457156