本文關(guān)鍵詞： 指導(dǎo)性案例 司法解釋 判例 事實上的約束力　出處：《北方工業(yè)大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：案例指導(dǎo)制度是我國司法審判活動中一次理論與實踐的創(chuàng)新,但其創(chuàng)新并未超出我國目前的法制背景以及法律體系。推行案例指導(dǎo)制度其目的是為了彌補成文法的不足,維護國家的法制統(tǒng)一,實現(xiàn)社會的公平正義。自2011年12月20日公布第一批指導(dǎo)性案例以來,截止到2014年1月26日,最高人民法院已經(jīng)相繼公布了六批26個指導(dǎo)性案例。然而卻很少被運用到司法實踐中去,這主要是由于最高人民法院有關(guān)案例指導(dǎo)工作的《規(guī)定》比較籠統(tǒng)、模糊,對規(guī)定中的“類似案件”、“應(yīng)當(dāng)參照”等內(nèi)容的理解容易讓人產(chǎn)生疑問而且對指導(dǎo)性案例的實際運用也未作出具體的規(guī)定。因此,案例指導(dǎo)制度雖然己經(jīng)發(fā)軔成行,但是在性質(zhì)、效力、運用等方面存在諸多問題,使得指導(dǎo)性案例的實踐運用受到很大的質(zhì)疑和阻力。 基于統(tǒng)一法律適用以及“同案同判”的法律訴求,對建立完善案例指導(dǎo)制度的必要性逐步達成共識。但是,一個根本性的問題浮現(xiàn)出來,即指導(dǎo)性案例的性質(zhì)、效力該如何確定?性質(zhì)問題是案例指導(dǎo)制度中一個十分重要的基礎(chǔ)性理論問題。任何制度只有對其性質(zhì)做出準(zhǔn)確的定位,才能使該制度有的放矢,找準(zhǔn)自己的位置,才可能使該制度實現(xiàn)自身的價值。指導(dǎo)性案例也不例外。本文主要選取司法解釋說、判例過渡說以及法律適用說三種主流觀點對指導(dǎo)性案例的性質(zhì)進行探討。關(guān)于我國指導(dǎo)性案例的效力問題,理論界和實務(wù)界也提出了不少建設(shè)性的意見。本文主要選取了三種主流觀點對指導(dǎo)性案例的效力進行探討,并對事實上約束力的可行性進行論證。性質(zhì)和效力問題是討論案例指導(dǎo)制度一切理論問題的基點,也是該項創(chuàng)新能否展現(xiàn)其魅力和順利實施的癥結(jié)所在。指導(dǎo)性案例的性質(zhì)和效力也是本文論述的重點。
[Abstract]:Case guidance system is a theoretical and practical innovation in judicial activities in China. But its innovation does not exceed the current legal background and legal system of our country. The purpose of carrying out the case guidance system is to make up for the deficiency of statutory law and to maintain the unity of the legal system of the country. Since the publication of the first instructive cases on December 20th 2011, until January 26th 2014. The Supreme people's Court has published six batches of 26 guiding cases in succession. However, they are rarely used in judicial practice, which is mainly due to the general provisions of the Supreme people's Court on case guidance work. Vague, the provisions of the "similar cases", "should reference" and other content of the understanding is easy to question and the actual use of guiding cases do not make specific provisions. Although the system of case guidance has already been started, there are many problems in nature, effectiveness and application, which make the practice of guiding cases be greatly questioned and hindered. Based on the application of unified law and the legal appeal of "co-adjudication", the necessity of establishing and perfecting the case guidance system has gradually reached a consensus. However, a fundamental problem emerges. That is, the nature of the guiding case, how to determine the effectiveness? The nature problem is a very important fundamental theoretical problem in the case guidance system. Only when any system makes an accurate positioning of its nature, can the system be targeted and find its own position. It is possible to make the system realize its own value. Instructive cases are no exception. The theory of case transition and the theory of the application of the law are the three mainstream viewpoints to discuss the nature of the guiding cases. On the effectiveness of guiding cases in China. Theorists and practitioners also put forward a lot of constructive views. This paper mainly selects three mainstream views to explore the effectiveness of guiding cases. And the feasibility of the de facto binding force is demonstrated. The nature and effectiveness of the case guidance system is the basis of the discussion of all theoretical issues. It is also the crux of whether the innovation can show its charm and smooth implementation. The nature and effectiveness of the guiding case is also the focus of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：北方工業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王立平;林志雄;;案例指導(dǎo)制度探析——基于性質(zhì)和指導(dǎo)性案例效力的角度[J];研究生法學(xué);2009年03期

2 李安;;歸納法在判例主義法律推理中的有效性與論證[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報);2007年02期

3 魏勝強;;為判例制度正名——關(guān)于構(gòu)建我國判例制度的思考[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2011年03期

4 秦旺;;論我國案例指導(dǎo)制度的構(gòu)建和適用方法——以《最高人民法院公報》為分析樣本[J];法律方法與法律思維;2007年00期

5 劉作翔;;我國為什么要實行案例指導(dǎo)制度[J];法律適用;2006年08期

6 陳興良;;我國案例指導(dǎo)制度功能之考察[J];法商研究;2012年02期

7 李仕春;;案例指導(dǎo)制度的另一條思路——司法能動主義在中國的有限適用[J];法學(xué);2009年06期

8 王利明;;我國案例指導(dǎo)制度若干問題研究[J];法學(xué);2012年01期

9 崔志寧;;論案例指導(dǎo)制度的運作機制[J];法制與社會;2008年29期

10 江勇;陳增寶;;指導(dǎo)性案例的效力問題探討[J];法治研究;2008年09期

，

本文編號：1444989