本文關(guān)鍵詞：論裁判摘要及其司法適用　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 裁判摘要 裁判規(guī)則 法律效力 司法適用

【摘要】：裁判摘要是指由最高人民法院對(duì)指導(dǎo)性案例中的裁判規(guī)則予以抽取和提煉,對(duì)新型疑難案件及法律規(guī)定存在模糊或漏洞的案件予以指導(dǎo)并提供解決方案,其涵蓋了裁判規(guī)則、裁判思思、裁判方法及簡(jiǎn)單案情,構(gòu)成了指導(dǎo)性案例的核心。裁判摘要在司法實(shí)踐中有其獨(dú)特價(jià)值,但目前學(xué)界對(duì)其的關(guān)注度和研究水平都有待進(jìn)一步提高。 正文分為五個(gè)部分,第一部分對(duì)裁判摘要與裁判要旨、案例指導(dǎo)原則等相關(guān)用語(yǔ)進(jìn)行辨析,進(jìn)而對(duì)其涵義與特征予以界定 第二部分闡述了裁判摘要的功能�，F(xiàn)如今,我國(guó)已基本建成了社會(huì)主義法律體系,但法律的規(guī)定不可能面面俱到,因而在司法實(shí)踐中會(huì)存在司法裁判對(duì)法律的漏洞進(jìn)行完善和補(bǔ)充的情況。裁判摘要正是順應(yīng)了時(shí)代發(fā)展的需要,起到了宣示裁判規(guī)則、填補(bǔ)法律漏洞等作用,從而保障了我國(guó)法律的統(tǒng)一適用。 第三部分系統(tǒng)論述了裁判摘要在司法實(shí)踐中的法律效力。作為指導(dǎo)性案例的核心部分,法官在審判中應(yīng)當(dāng)參照,并可以作為說(shuō)理依據(jù)加以引用。但其法律效力的現(xiàn)狀不容樂(lè)觀(guān),無(wú)論學(xué)術(shù)界還是實(shí)務(wù)界都對(duì)其效力提出了質(zhì)疑,本部分從裁判摘要的內(nèi)在說(shuō)理性及制作主體權(quán)威性的角度對(duì)此做了詳細(xì)論證。 第四部分著眼于裁判摘要的形成,其形成過(guò)程必須經(jīng)過(guò)嚴(yán)格的程序要求,否則無(wú)法保證它的權(quán)威性與參照效力。裁判摘要的撰寫(xiě)主體只能是最高人民法院的專(zhuān)門(mén)部門(mén),因?yàn)槠溆袊?yán)格的技術(shù)要求,而其內(nèi)容涵蓋了裁判規(guī)則、裁判思想、裁判方法及簡(jiǎn)單案情四個(gè)方而,在達(dá)到一定數(shù)是后應(yīng)當(dāng)予以編纂。 第五部分具體針對(duì)我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐,構(gòu)建了裁判摘要的司法適用步驟。撰寫(xiě)裁判摘要的主要作用就是為以后的審判活動(dòng)提供參照并將其運(yùn)用于司法實(shí)踐,因此裁判摘要如何得到有效適用就成為了首要應(yīng)當(dāng)解決的問(wèn)題。而裁判摘要的司法適用需要具備一些必要的技術(shù),這些技術(shù)包括：案情比對(duì),裁判摘要的引證和裁判摘要的排排除適用原則等。案情比對(duì)需要適用類(lèi)比推理的方法,當(dāng)法官對(duì)案情進(jìn)行比對(duì)之后,如果兩案的基本案情相同或類(lèi)似,則后案中的判決應(yīng)引證前案中的裁判摘要。作某些情況下,如果繼續(xù)參照先前指導(dǎo)性案例的裁判摘要,顯然將出現(xiàn)不合理而且不公正的判決,此時(shí)應(yīng)當(dāng)排除此裁判摘要的適用而對(duì)其另行判決。
[Abstract]:Abstract of judgment refers to the Supreme people's Court to extract and refine the rules of adjudication in guiding cases, to guide and provide solutions to new difficult cases and cases where the legal provisions are vague or flawed. It covers the rules of the referee, the thinking of the referee, the method of adjudication and the simple case, which constitute the core of the guiding case. The abstract of the referee has its unique value in the judicial practice. However, the current academic attention and research level need to be further improved. The text is divided into five parts. The first part discriminates and analyzes the relevant terms such as the abstract and the gist of the referee, the guiding principle of the case, and then defines its meaning and characteristics. The second part expounds the function of the umpire abstract. Nowadays, our country has basically built the socialist legal system, but the provisions of the law can not be everywhere. Therefore, in the judicial practice, there will be the judicial judgment to perfect and supplement the loopholes of the law. The abstract of the referee is in line with the needs of the development of the times, has played a role in declaring the rules of adjudication, filling the loopholes in the law, and so on. Thus ensuring the unified application of Chinese law. The third part systematically discusses the legal effect of the judicial summary in the judicial practice. As the core part of the guiding case, the judge should refer to it in the trial. And can be cited as a basis for reasoning. But the current situation of its legal effect is not optimistic, whether academic or practical circles have questioned its effectiveness. This part demonstrates this in detail from the angle of the internal reason and authoritativeness of the referee abstract. Part 4th focuses on the formation of the umpire summary, which must go through strict procedural requirements. Otherwise, it can not guarantee its authoritativeness and referential effect. The main body of the umpire abstract can only be the special department of the Supreme people's Court, because it has strict technical requirements, and its content covers the rules of the referee and the adjudication thought. The judgment method and the simple case should be codified after reaching a certain number. In the 5th part, according to the judicial practice of our country, the author constructs the judicial application steps of the judicial summary. The main function of writing the judicial summary is to provide the reference for the later judicial activities and apply it to the judicial practice. Therefore, how to get the effective application of the judicial summary has become the most important problem to be solved, and the judicial application of the judicial summary needs some necessary techniques, including: case comparison. Case comparison needs to apply the method of analogical reasoning, when the judge compares the case, if the basic case of the two cases is the same or similar. Then the judgment in the latter case should quote the summary of the decision in the former case. In some cases, if we continue to refer to the summary of the previous guiding case, it is clear that there will be an unreasonable and unfair judgment. At this time, the application of this summary shall be excluded and a separate judgment shall be made on it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 侯猛;;最高人民法院判決的比較優(yōu)勢(shì)[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年06期

2 劉風(fēng)景;;裁判摘要的原理與制作——以《最高人民法院公報(bào)》公布案例為素材[J];法律方法;2009年00期

3 李克誠(chéng);劉思萱;;論法律原則在我國(guó)司法裁判中的適用 以《最高人民法院公報(bào)》案例為范本的研究[J];法律適用;2008年03期

4 周佑勇;;作為過(guò)渡措施的案例指導(dǎo)制度——以“行政[2005]004號(hào)案例”為觀(guān)察對(duì)象[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2006年03期

5 陳興良;司法解釋功過(guò)之議[J];法學(xué);2003年08期

6 張騏;;指導(dǎo)性案例中具有指導(dǎo)性部分的確定與適用[J];法學(xué);2008年10期

7 宋曉;;裁判摘要的性質(zhì)追問(wèn)[J];法學(xué);2010年02期

8 馮文生;;審判案例指導(dǎo)中的“參照”問(wèn)題研究[J];清華法學(xué);2011年03期

9 李友根;;指導(dǎo)性案例為何沒(méi)有約束力——以無(wú)名氏因交通肇事致死案件中的原告資格為研究對(duì)象[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2010年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1378887