本文關鍵詞：論刑事和解制度在檢察機關的適用　出處：《廣東商學院》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關文章： 刑事和解 檢察機關 制度構建

【摘要】：刑事和解制度是當前我國在構建和諧社會及寬嚴相濟刑事司法政策的大背景下，順應恢復性司法理念的指引，司法機關在法律實務中所進行的有益嘗試。檢察機關作為適用刑事和解的司法主體，較早地將刑事和解理論及操作模式引入了刑事司法程序的處理當中。我國刑事和解從萌芽到逐步發(fā)展，每個階段都受到了法學理論界和實務部門的廣泛關注。對刑事和解制度在檢察機關的適用內(nèi)涵，可概括為刑事案件進入檢察階段時，對于一些特定的刑事犯罪行為，可以由加害人與被害人直接協(xié)商，或者在檢察機關主持下，加害人以認罪、賠償損失、道歉等方式與被害人達成諒解，并在此基礎上簽訂和解協(xié)議，，檢察機關經(jīng)過對雙方的和解協(xié)議進行審查確認后，決定不予追究或者建議減輕犯罪嫌疑人刑事責任的一種司法處置模式。在檢察機關適用刑事和解，其積極意義在于提高檢察機關辦案效率，最大限度地保護被害人的合法權益，促使犯罪嫌疑人更好地回歸社會，以保障社會長期的穩(wěn)定性。當前，我國新《刑事訴訟法》已經(jīng)從法律層面上確定了檢察機關適用刑事和解制度的主體地位，刑事和解制度在我國司法界正在如火如荼地推行當中，但是，任何制度在推行中所產(chǎn)生的影響猶如一枚硬幣的兩面，積極效應與消極反響同時并存，刑事和解制度在檢察機關的適用，積極效果是顯而易見的，但同樣也不可避免地會產(chǎn)生一些矛盾或問題。故而，結合現(xiàn)階段我國檢察機關適用刑事和解過程中所存在的問題，并提出對該環(huán)節(jié)完善的配套措施，將是本論文研究的重點。 論文內(nèi)容共劃分為四部分：第一部分對刑事和解制度在檢察機關適用的基本理論進行概述。主要介紹了刑事和解制度在檢察機關適用刑事的理論內(nèi)涵、基本特點及其價值分析。第二部分分析了刑事和解制度在檢察機關適用的現(xiàn)狀及存在問題。第三部分通過借鑒國外檢察機關在適用刑事和解過程中的相關立法及具體操作經(jīng)驗，以期對我國刑事和解制度在檢察機關的適用帶來一些啟發(fā)。第四部分提出了完善刑事和解制度在檢察機關適用的相應配套措施建設，以更好地推進刑事和解制度在檢察機關的有效適用。
[Abstract]:The system of criminal reconciliation is the guidance of the concept of restorative justice under the background of constructing a harmonious society and combining leniency and strict punishment with criminal justice policy. Judicial organs in the legal practice of the beneficial attempt. Procuratorial organs as the application of criminal reconciliation of the judicial subject. The theory and operation mode of criminal reconciliation were introduced into the criminal justice procedure earlier. The criminal reconciliation in our country developed from the bud to the gradual development. Each stage has been widely concerned by the legal theorists and practical departments. The applicable connotation of the criminal reconciliation system in the procuratorial organs can be summarized as when the criminal cases enter the procuratorial stage. For some specific criminal acts, the perpetrator and the victim can consult directly, or under the auspices of the procuratorial organ, the perpetrator can reach an understanding with the victim by pleading guilty, compensating for the loss, apologizing and so on. And on this basis signed a settlement agreement, the procuratorial organs after the two sides of the settlement agreement after the examination and confirmation. To decide not to investigate or to suggest a mode of judicial treatment to reduce criminal responsibility of criminal suspects. The positive significance of criminal reconciliation in procuratorial organs lies in improving the efficiency of handling cases by procuratorial organs. To maximize the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of victims, to promote the better return of criminal suspects to society, in order to protect the long-term stability of society. The new Criminal procedure Law of our country has confirmed the subject status of the procuratorial organ applying the criminal reconciliation system from the legal level, and the criminal reconciliation system is being carried out in full swing in the judicial circles of our country, but. Any system in the implementation of the impact is like a coin on both sides, both positive effects and negative repercussions coexist, the criminal reconciliation system in the application of the procuratorial organs, the positive effect is obvious. But it is also inevitable that there will be some contradictions or problems. Therefore, combining with the problems existing in the process of criminal reconciliation applied by the procuratorial organs at the present stage, the author puts forward the necessary measures to improve this link. Will be the focus of this paper. The content of the thesis is divided into four parts: the first part summarizes the basic theory of the criminal reconciliation system applied in the procuratorial organ. It mainly introduces the theoretical connotation of the criminal reconciliation system in the procuratorial organ. The second part analyzes the current situation and existing problems of the criminal reconciliation system in the procuratorial organs. The third part draws lessons from the relevant legislation of foreign procuratorial organs in the process of applying criminal reconciliation. Specific operational experience. In order to bring some inspiration to the application of the criminal reconciliation system in the procuratorial organs. Part 4th puts forward the corresponding supporting measures to perfect the criminal reconciliation system in the procuratorial organs. In order to better promote the effective application of the criminal reconciliation system in the procuratorial organs.
【學位授予單位】：廣東商學院
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D925.2;D926.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 史立梅;;刑事和解的程序建構[J];北京師范大學學報(社會科學版);2010年03期

2 李云;;檢察刑事和解規(guī)范化問題研究[J];北京政法職業(yè)學院學報;2010年02期

3 甄貞;陳靜;;建設和諧社會與構建刑事和解制度的思考[J];法學雜志;2006年04期

4 羅結珍;;法國刑事訴訟法中的刑事調(diào)解與刑事和解[J];法學雜志;2008年03期

5 李洪亮;;檢察階段適用“刑事和解”問題研究[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬);2010年06期

6 李莉航;;新刑訴法背景下檢察機關適用刑事和解再研究[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(中旬);2012年05期

7 郭晶;;論構建刑事和解制度的訴訟階段間銜接機制——以探討檢察機關職權定位為線索[J];法制與社會;2009年03期

8 孫麗娟;徐靈菱;;公訴環(huán)節(jié)實行刑事和解的利弊探析[J];法制與社會;2009年28期

9 王利平;張愷;;審查逮捕階段進行刑事和解的現(xiàn)實問題及未來展望[J];法制與社會;2012年09期

10 孫紹杰;;檢察機關刑事和解機制初探[J];遼寧公安司法管理干部學院學報;2008年04期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 陳建民;[N];法制日報;2002年

相關碩士學位論文 前6條

1 謝彩靈;刑事和解制度中檢察機關的角色定位[D];西南財經(jīng)大學;2011年

2 武新宇;檢察視角下的刑事和解制度[D];黑龍江大學;2011年

3 王燕;論檢察環(huán)節(jié)刑事和解的制度化構建[D];山東大學;2011年

4 潘月玲;檢察環(huán)節(jié)刑事和解機制的探索與實踐[D];廈門大學;2007年

5 李方旭;構建和諧語境下的刑事和解制度[D];蘇州大學;2009年

6 穆柏川;審查起訴階段刑事和解制度研究[D];鄭州大學;2012年

本文編號：1378451