【摘要】：法律思維主要是法律職業(yè)群體依據(jù)法律進(jìn)行思考的方式,具有十分重要的意義。但是,法律思維也有著一定局限,包括僅僅聚焦于個(gè)案、過于專業(yè)化和本土化難題等方面。如果說法律思維是根據(jù)法律進(jìn)行思考的話,那么法治思維就是以法律規(guī)范為基礎(chǔ),圍繞法律及其相關(guān)社會(huì)規(guī)范進(jìn)行思考的方式。相比較而言,法治思維更加全面和綜合。法治思維能夠彌補(bǔ)法律思維的不足,二者的區(qū)別表現(xiàn)在主體、評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、作用范圍和學(xué)科屬性上,其中主體的區(qū)別具有決定意義。法律思維與法治思維共同指向于中國法治建設(shè)的實(shí)踐。在未來的發(fā)展中,法治思維將成為社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期的主流意識(shí)形態(tài),而法治方式將成為主導(dǎo)社會(huì)治理的手段。從法律思維到法治思維展現(xiàn)了法治的拓展和深化,在推動(dòng)法治建設(shè)的過程中,法律職業(yè)群體和權(quán)力階層需要攜手共進(jìn),法律思維和法治思維也需要深度融合。正式法律制度是實(shí)現(xiàn)這種深度融合的主要方式,具體制度形式包括法律顧問制度、規(guī)范性文件、重大決策合法性審查機(jī)制和考核問責(zé)機(jī)制等。
[Abstract]:Legal thinking is mainly a way for legal professional groups to think according to the law, which is of great significance. However, legal thinking also has some limitations, including only focusing on individual cases, too professional and localization problems and so on. If legal thinking is to think according to the law, then the thinking of the rule of law is based on the legal norms, around the law and its related social norms to think about the way. In contrast, the thinking of the rule of law is more comprehensive and comprehensive. The thinking of rule of law can make up for the deficiency of legal thinking. The differences between the two are manifested in the subject, the evaluation standard, the scope of function and the subject attribute, in which the difference between the subject is of decisive significance. Legal thinking and legal thinking both point to the practice of the construction of the rule of law in China. In the future development, the thinking of rule of law will become the mainstream ideology in the period of social transformation, and the way of rule of law will become the means of leading social governance. From legal thinking to rule of law thinking shows the expansion and deepening of the rule of law. In the process of promoting the construction of the rule of law, the legal professional groups and the power class need to work together, and the legal thinking and the thinking of the rule of law also need to be deeply integrated. The formal legal system is the main way to realize this kind of deep integration. The specific institutional forms include the legal adviser system, normative documents, the review mechanism of major decision-making legitimacy and the assessment and accountability mechanism, and so on.
【作者單位】： 山東大學(xué)(威海)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會(huì)科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目“社會(huì)矛盾化解的法律適用方法研究”(11CFX002) 2014年司法部項(xiàng)目“實(shí)現(xiàn)個(gè)案正義的法律方法論研究”(14SFB3003)
【分類號(hào)】：D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 諶洪果;法律思維:一種思維方式上的檢討[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

2 謝新竹;;論判決的公眾認(rèn)同[J];法律適用;2007年01期

3 陳金釗;法律思維及其對(duì)法治的意義[J];法商研究;2003年06期

4 江必新;;法治思維——社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期治國理政的應(yīng)然向度[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2013年05期

5 李梅;張紅揚(yáng);;論領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部法治思維和法治方式的養(yǎng)成[J];毛澤東思想研究;2013年06期

6 孫笑俠;;法律思維方法的“器”與治國理政的“道”[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年11期

7 李茂春;呂麗梅;;提高領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部運(yùn)用法治思維和法治方式的能力[J];求實(shí);2013年10期

8 陳金釗;;“法治思維和法治方式”的意蘊(yùn)[J];法學(xué)論壇;2013年05期

9 董倩;張璐;黃R，

本文編號(hào)：2522549