論富勒法律內(nèi)在道德觀的確立及價(jià)值
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-07-03 19:05
【摘要】： 上個(gè)世紀(jì)中葉,美國(guó)法學(xué)家富勒與英國(guó)法學(xué)家哈特之間針對(duì)“法律與道德是分離還是結(jié)合”展開(kāi)了激烈的論戰(zhàn)。在這場(chǎng)論戰(zhàn)中,富勒創(chuàng)新性的提出了法律的內(nèi)在道德理論,它包括八項(xiàng)原則,分別是:一般性原則、公開(kāi)性原則、非溯及既往性原則、明確性原則、一致性原則、可行性原則、穩(wěn)定性原則、官方行為與法律一致性原則,富勒稱其為程序自然法,將其歸屬于愿望的道德范疇。該理論不僅在西方法學(xué)界產(chǎn)生了巨大的影響,更對(duì)現(xiàn)今中國(guó)的法治建設(shè)有著重要的啟示作用。 本文的研究對(duì)象是富勒的法律內(nèi)在道德理論的確立及價(jià)值,以富勒的《法律的道德性》為研究文本,從富勒與哈特的論戰(zhàn)出發(fā),通過(guò)對(duì)法律與道德關(guān)系的爭(zhēng)論試圖說(shuō)明富勒的法律內(nèi)在道德確立的脈絡(luò)。 在具體的研究方法上,本文主要采用文獻(xiàn)分析法、歷史考察分析法與比較分析法。通過(guò)對(duì)文本的解讀來(lái)理解富勒法律內(nèi)在道德的性質(zhì),同時(shí)根據(jù)富勒對(duì)法律概念的界定,最終對(duì)富勒的法律內(nèi)在道德理論進(jìn)行定位。 全文共分為四個(gè)部分。 第一部分主要敘述了富勒法律內(nèi)在道德提出的背景。首先,本部分以“告密者案件”引發(fā)的爭(zhēng)論為切入點(diǎn),探討“惡法亦法”還是“惡法非法”,最終法院對(duì)這個(gè)案件的判決以及德國(guó)法學(xué)家拉德布魯赫從法律實(shí)證主義向自然法的轉(zhuǎn)變,使這個(gè)爭(zhēng)論趨于白熱化。接著,從法律實(shí)證主義的“分離論”出發(fā),分析了他們堅(jiān)持“分離論”的背景,富勒通過(guò)對(duì)他們的批判,得出法律與道德不可分離的結(jié)論。 第二部分主要論述了法律內(nèi)在道德是怎么得到最終的確立的。這里主要以《法律的道德性》為研究文本。本部分先從富勒對(duì)愿望的道德與義務(wù)的道德的區(qū)分著手,通過(guò)富勒在道德尺度、倫理學(xué)語(yǔ)匯的角度、邊際效用的角度方面對(duì)這兩種道德的區(qū)分進(jìn)行的詳細(xì)的闡述,得出富勒對(duì)這兩種道德區(qū)分的根本意圖在于以此為根據(jù)提出法律的內(nèi)在道德。接下來(lái),對(duì)雷克斯造法失敗的教訓(xùn)中富勒總結(jié)出八項(xiàng)原則進(jìn)行分別考察,最后,對(duì)法律的內(nèi)在道德進(jìn)行理論的分析,得出法律內(nèi)在道德是程序自然法,是一種愿望的道德,它蘊(yùn)含著對(duì)人的理解,這些對(duì)法律內(nèi)在道德的定位,表明了法律內(nèi)在道德的最終確立。 第三部分主要闡述了法律內(nèi)在道德的價(jià)值。富勒通過(guò)對(duì)反對(duì)者的批評(píng)論證,通過(guò)對(duì)法律內(nèi)在道德的界定,得出法律是一項(xiàng)有目的的事業(yè)這個(gè)結(jié)論,這也是法律內(nèi)在道德的最終歸宿與價(jià)值。接下來(lái),分別從立法、執(zhí)法、司法三個(gè)角度出發(fā),結(jié)合富勒所提出的程序自然法理論對(duì)我國(guó)的法治建設(shè)的指導(dǎo)價(jià)值進(jìn)行了闡述。 最后是結(jié)語(yǔ)部分,通過(guò)對(duì)富勒法律內(nèi)在道德理論性質(zhì)的簡(jiǎn)要的闡述,再次說(shuō)明富勒理論的價(jià)值,并且對(duì)它給中國(guó)法治的啟示作用再次做了肯定。
[Abstract]:In the middle of last century, there was a fierce debate between American jurist Fuller and British jurist Hart about whether law and morality are separated or combined. In this debate, Fuller innovatively put forward the inherent moral theory of law, which includes eight principles: general principle, openness principle, non-retroactive principle, clarity principle, consistency principle, feasibility principle, stability principle, official behavior and legal consistency principle. Fuller calls it procedural natural law and belongs to the moral category of desire. This theory not only has a great influence in the western legal circles, but also plays an important role in enlightening the construction of the rule of law in China. The object of this paper is the establishment and value of Fuller's inner moral theory of law. Taking Fuller's morality of Law as the research text, starting from the debate between Fuller and Hart, this paper tries to explain the context of Fuller's internal moral establishment of law through the debate on the relationship between law and morality. In the specific research methods, this paper mainly uses literature analysis, historical investigation analysis and comparative analysis. Through the interpretation of the text to understand the nature of Fuller's legal inherent morality, and according to Fuller's definition of the legal concept, Fuller's legal internal moral theory is finally positioned. The full text is divided into four parts. The first part mainly describes the background of Fuller's inherent morality. First of all, this part takes the debate caused by the "whistleblower case" as the starting point, discusses whether the "draconian law is also the law" or "the draconian law illegal". Finally, the court judgment on this case and the transformation of German jurist Ladbroch from legal positivism to natural law make this debate tend to heat up. Then, starting from the "separation theory" of legal positivism, this paper analyzes the background of their adherence to the "separation theory", and Fuller draws the conclusion that the law and morality are inseparable through his criticism of them. The second part mainly discusses how the inherent morality of law is finally established. Here mainly takes the morality of the law as the research text. This part begins with Fuller's distinction between the morality of desire and the morality of obligation, and through Fuller's detailed exposition of the distinction between the two kinds of morality from the angle of moral yardstick, ethical vocabulary and marginal utility, it is concluded that Fuller's fundamental intention to distinguish the two kinds of morality lies in putting forward the inherent morality of law on this basis. Next, Fuller summed up eight principles in the lessons of Rex's failure to make law. Finally, he analyzed the internal morality of law theoretically and concluded that the inner morality of law is procedural natural law and a kind of desired morality, which contains the understanding of human beings. These positions of internal morality of law show the final establishment of internal morality of law. The third part mainly expounds the value of the inherent morality of the law. Fuller draws the conclusion that the law is a purposeful cause through the criticism and argumentation of the opponents and the definition of the inherent morality of the law, which is also the final destination and value of the inherent morality of the law. Then, from the three angles of legislation, law enforcement and judicature, combined with Fuller's theory of procedural natural law, this paper expounds the guiding value of the construction of the rule of law in our country. Finally, the conclusion part, through a brief exposition of the inherent moral theory of Fuller law, once again explains the value of Fuller theory, and reconfirms its enlightening effect on the rule of law in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D909.1
本文編號(hào)：2509603
[Abstract]:In the middle of last century, there was a fierce debate between American jurist Fuller and British jurist Hart about whether law and morality are separated or combined. In this debate, Fuller innovatively put forward the inherent moral theory of law, which includes eight principles: general principle, openness principle, non-retroactive principle, clarity principle, consistency principle, feasibility principle, stability principle, official behavior and legal consistency principle. Fuller calls it procedural natural law and belongs to the moral category of desire. This theory not only has a great influence in the western legal circles, but also plays an important role in enlightening the construction of the rule of law in China. The object of this paper is the establishment and value of Fuller's inner moral theory of law. Taking Fuller's morality of Law as the research text, starting from the debate between Fuller and Hart, this paper tries to explain the context of Fuller's internal moral establishment of law through the debate on the relationship between law and morality. In the specific research methods, this paper mainly uses literature analysis, historical investigation analysis and comparative analysis. Through the interpretation of the text to understand the nature of Fuller's legal inherent morality, and according to Fuller's definition of the legal concept, Fuller's legal internal moral theory is finally positioned. The full text is divided into four parts. The first part mainly describes the background of Fuller's inherent morality. First of all, this part takes the debate caused by the "whistleblower case" as the starting point, discusses whether the "draconian law is also the law" or "the draconian law illegal". Finally, the court judgment on this case and the transformation of German jurist Ladbroch from legal positivism to natural law make this debate tend to heat up. Then, starting from the "separation theory" of legal positivism, this paper analyzes the background of their adherence to the "separation theory", and Fuller draws the conclusion that the law and morality are inseparable through his criticism of them. The second part mainly discusses how the inherent morality of law is finally established. Here mainly takes the morality of the law as the research text. This part begins with Fuller's distinction between the morality of desire and the morality of obligation, and through Fuller's detailed exposition of the distinction between the two kinds of morality from the angle of moral yardstick, ethical vocabulary and marginal utility, it is concluded that Fuller's fundamental intention to distinguish the two kinds of morality lies in putting forward the inherent morality of law on this basis. Next, Fuller summed up eight principles in the lessons of Rex's failure to make law. Finally, he analyzed the internal morality of law theoretically and concluded that the inner morality of law is procedural natural law and a kind of desired morality, which contains the understanding of human beings. These positions of internal morality of law show the final establishment of internal morality of law. The third part mainly expounds the value of the inherent morality of the law. Fuller draws the conclusion that the law is a purposeful cause through the criticism and argumentation of the opponents and the definition of the inherent morality of the law, which is also the final destination and value of the inherent morality of the law. Then, from the three angles of legislation, law enforcement and judicature, combined with Fuller's theory of procedural natural law, this paper expounds the guiding value of the construction of the rule of law in our country. Finally, the conclusion part, through a brief exposition of the inherent moral theory of Fuller law, once again explains the value of Fuller theory, and reconfirms its enlightening effect on the rule of law in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D909.1
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 李琳;我國(guó)刑事訴訟司法解釋的現(xiàn)狀反思和未來(lái)前瞻[D];上海交通大學(xué);2011年
，本文編號(hào)：2509603
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2509603.html
最近更新
教材專著
