裁判方法論:迷思與超越
發(fā)布時間：2019-05-31 22:41
【摘要】：正裁判方法在當下似乎成為統(tǒng)一法律適用與規(guī)范裁量權的靈丹妙藥。但是,方法并非我們想象的那樣總是可靠而且有效。〔1〕特別是在辯證法與形而上學發(fā)生了巨大的范式分野之后,堅持什么方法就必須考察其背后的方法論。在裁判方法論的理論版圖上,一直存在著獨斷主
[Abstract]:At present, the method of positive adjudication seems to be a panacea for unifying the application of law and standardizing discretion. However, the method is not always reliable and effective as we think. (1) especially after the huge paradigm distinction between dialectics and metaphysics, it is necessary to examine the methodology behind it. In the theoretical territory of referee methodology, there has always been arbitrariness.
【作者單位】： 最高人民法院;
【分類號】：D90
[Abstract]:At present, the method of positive adjudication seems to be a panacea for unifying the application of law and standardizing discretion. However, the method is not always reliable and effective as we think. (1) especially after the huge paradigm distinction between dialectics and metaphysics, it is necessary to examine the methodology behind it. In the theoretical territory of referee methodology, there has always been arbitrariness.
【作者單位】： 最高人民法院;
【分類號】：D90
【共引文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 劉捷;從本體論到實踐論——馬克思主義論人的方法的根本變革[J];安徽師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2000年02期
2 馬育良;仁、義與孔孟的經(jīng)權思想[J];安徽師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2000年04期
3 彭啟福;西方詮釋學詮釋重心的轉(zhuǎn)換及其合理走向[J];安徽師范大學學報(人文社會科學版);2003年02期
4 張，
本文編號：2490061
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2490061.html
