【摘要】：社會(huì)的發(fā)展必然伴隨著矛盾的產(chǎn)生，尤其是對(duì)于我國(guó)這個(gè)快速發(fā)展中的國(guó)家，各種矛盾糾紛錯(cuò)綜復(fù)雜，，對(duì)矛盾的正確調(diào)處顯得尤為重要，矛盾是促使社會(huì)發(fā)展進(jìn)步的內(nèi)在動(dòng)力。隨著我黨提出“依法治國(guó)，建設(shè)社會(huì)主義法治國(guó)家”的目標(biāo)后，關(guān)于社會(huì)矛盾調(diào)解的法治化的相關(guān)研究不斷得到更多的關(guān)注。社會(huì)矛盾化解、社會(huì)管理創(chuàng)新、公正廉潔執(zhí)法是當(dāng)前司法行政工作的三項(xiàng)重點(diǎn)工作，是中央根據(jù)我國(guó)國(guó)情、民情和經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀對(duì)司法工作提出的富有針對(duì)性的戰(zhàn)略部署，其中，社會(huì)矛盾化解是三項(xiàng)工作中的基礎(chǔ)，只有做好社會(huì)矛盾的化解才能有力的推進(jìn)其他工作的展開(kāi)，這足以說(shuō)明社會(huì)矛盾的處理在我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段工作中的重要位置。 本文在對(duì)社會(huì)矛盾、社會(huì)矛盾調(diào)解以及法治化等相關(guān)基礎(chǔ)概念的界定和闡述的基礎(chǔ)上，通過(guò)對(duì)社會(huì)矛盾調(diào)解的法治化的可行性和有效性進(jìn)行理論性的分析，確認(rèn)社會(huì)矛盾調(diào)解的法治化的重要地位。在實(shí)踐方面，通過(guò)對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段社會(huì)矛盾產(chǎn)生的原因，表現(xiàn)的形勢(shì)進(jìn)行詳盡分析后，提出一種符合我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段社會(huì)矛盾特點(diǎn)的社會(huì)矛盾調(diào)解的法治化基礎(chǔ)框架。 本文共分五個(gè)大的部分。第一部分首先對(duì)現(xiàn)階段的研究現(xiàn)狀作了介紹，并對(duì)社會(huì)矛盾、社會(huì)矛盾調(diào)解及法治化等關(guān)鍵概念理論做了介紹。 第二部分介紹了法治化道路化解社會(huì)矛盾是大勢(shì)所趨，既是現(xiàn)實(shí)社會(huì)發(fā)展、矛盾糾紛解決的需要，也是我國(guó)依法治國(guó)方略的要求。 第三部分重點(diǎn)分析了我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段依法化解社會(huì)矛盾的實(shí)踐情況。社會(huì)矛盾的出現(xiàn)既有宏觀原因也有微觀原因。社會(huì)矛盾的形態(tài)主要表現(xiàn)在政治領(lǐng)域、經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域和思想領(lǐng)域。尤其以經(jīng)濟(jì)領(lǐng)域的矛盾最為突出，包括貧富差距不斷擴(kuò)大和就業(yè)形勢(shì)緊張等矛盾。在政治領(lǐng)域主要就表現(xiàn)為干群矛盾緊張。由于各種思潮交融，引發(fā)了人們對(duì)原有價(jià)值觀念的懷疑和動(dòng)搖，尤其引發(fā)了思想領(lǐng)域各種矛盾沖突。文章主要從法律、政策、經(jīng)濟(jì)、行政、思想五個(gè)方面來(lái)分析，結(jié)合我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段國(guó)情，對(duì)各種化解社會(huì)矛盾的方法做了介紹和比較。 第四部分介紹了我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段依法化解社會(huì)矛盾存在的問(wèn)題并分析其中的原因。 第五部分即文章最后詳細(xì)論述了社會(huì)矛盾調(diào)解法治化的原則和方法。結(jié)合筆者工作實(shí)際，論述了人民調(diào)解、司法調(diào)解、行政調(diào)解組成的“三調(diào)聯(lián)動(dòng)”工作機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:The development of society must be accompanied by the emergence of contradictions, especially for China, a rapidly developing country, various contradictions and disputes are complicated, the correct adjustment of contradictions appears to be particularly important, contradictions are the internal driving force to promote social development and progress. With the goal of "ruling the country according to law and building a socialist country ruled by law" put forward by our party, more and more attention has been paid to the related research on the rule of law in the mediation of social contradictions. Resolving social contradictions, innovating social management, and enforcing the law in a fair and honest manner are the three key tasks of the current judicial administration work, and are the targeted strategic arrangements put forward by the central authorities for judicial work in the light of the national conditions of our country, the people's conditions and the current situation of economic and social development. Among them, the settlement of social contradictions is the basis of the three work, only to do a good job in resolving social contradictions can effectively promote the launch of other work, which is enough to show that the handling of social contradictions in China at the present stage of the important position in the work. On the basis of defining and expounding the related basic concepts such as social contradiction, social contradiction mediation and rule by law, this paper theoretically analyzes the feasibility and effectiveness of the rule of law of social contradiction mediation. Confirm the important position of the rule of law of social contradiction mediation. In practice, through the detailed analysis of the causes and situation of social contradictions in our country at present, this paper puts forward a legal-based framework of social contradiction mediation, which accords with the characteristics of social contradictions in our country at the present stage. This paper is divided into five major parts. The first part introduces the present situation of the research, and introduces the key concepts of social contradiction, social contradiction mediation and rule of law. The second part introduces the rule of law road to resolve social contradictions is the general trend, which is not only the real social development, the need to resolve contradictions and disputes, but also the rule of law in China. The third part focuses on the analysis of the practice of resolving social contradictions in accordance with the law at the present stage of our country. There are both macro and micro reasons for the emergence of social contradictions. The form of social contradiction mainly displays in the political field, the economic domain and the ideological field. In particular, the contradiction in the economic field is most prominent, including the widening gap between the rich and the poor and the tense employment situation. In the political field, the main manifestation is the contradiction and tension between the cadres and the masses. Because of the blending of various ideological trends, people doubt and shake the original values, especially the contradictions and conflicts in the ideological field. This article mainly from the law, the policy, the economy, the administration, the thought five aspects to analyze, unifies our country present stage national condition, has made the introduction and the comparison to the various methods to resolve the social contradiction. The fourth part introduces the existing problems of resolving the social contradictions in accordance with the law and analyzes the reasons. The fifth part is the last part of the article discusses in detail the principles and methods of the rule of law in the mediation of social contradictions. Combined with the author's practical work, this paper discusses the "three-tone linkage" working mechanism composed of people's mediation, judicial mediation and administrative mediation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳凱;;論中國(guó)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型期多元價(jià)值觀的沖突與消解[J];北京教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

2 孫午生;;當(dāng)前社會(huì)矛盾糾紛化解狀況分析[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年01期

3 陳宏;;論基層政府社會(huì)矛盾調(diào)處機(jī)制的構(gòu)建[J];創(chuàng)新;2012年02期

4 覃正愛(ài);論社會(huì)矛盾分析方法的基本作用[J];長(zhǎng)沙理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期

5 沈恒斌,吳少鷹;新時(shí)期社會(huì)矛盾糾紛的表現(xiàn)形式及其多元化解決機(jī)制建構(gòu)思路[J];中國(guó)司法;2005年12期

6 姚亮;呂東霞;林永強(qiáng);;現(xiàn)階段中國(guó)的社會(huì)矛盾及特征分析[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;2011年06期

7 倪瑾;;轉(zhuǎn)型期社會(huì)矛盾的成因及其化解機(jī)制[J];黨政論壇;2011年04期

8 劉中起;風(fēng)笑天;;走向多元治理化解:新形勢(shì)下社會(huì)矛盾化解機(jī)制的新探索[J];福建論壇(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

9 張祥明;大學(xué)生就業(yè)難問(wèn)題中需要厘清的三個(gè)觀念問(wèn)題[J];福建教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年07期

10 孫國(guó)華;方林;;公平正義是化解社會(huì)矛盾的根本原則[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 姜佳杞;和諧社會(huì)視域下的干群矛盾及調(diào)節(jié)機(jī)制探析[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2010年

2 楊松潤(rùn);和諧社會(huì)建設(shè)中城管執(zhí)法問(wèn)題探究[D];南昌大學(xué);2010年

3 左小艷;轉(zhuǎn)型期城管人員與攤販沖突及其化解路徑研究[D];云南大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：2462557