漢代買賣之債研究
[Abstract]:The Han Dynasty is an important stage of China's feudal society, and its political and legal system is gradually improved, and it has a far-reaching influence on the later generations. The research on the legal system of the Han Dynasty in the past academic circles has focused on the "criminal law" and the "administrative law", but the research of the "civil law" standard is not limited to a certain side. This paper, based on the angle of legal history, uses the relevant theories and methods of modern law to draw on the research theories and achievements of the relevant subjects, and tries to carry on a more in-depth and systematic study of the debt in the Han Dynasty. In an era of academic research, new discoveries, new materials, Take this material to study and ask for the old question, it is the way of learning. The author, based on the rigorous and realistic attitude of the past and the present and seeking truth from facts, has carefully collected the records of the Cliff, the inscription, the purchase of the vouchers, the archaeological materials, the Tao Wen and the general literature of the Han and other places, which have been unearthed in Gansu, Dunhuang and other places in the past years. On the Original Surface of the Development of the Purchase and Sale Contract in the Han Dynasty In the Han Dynasty, the parties involved in the debt and the performance of the debt included the State, the social organization and the family (the household). and individuals. But for families and individuals, they tend to be tight A family (family) or even a family. Although they can interact with the outside world, the civil subject in the modern civil law is different from the civil subject in the modern civil law: there is no "private wealth" in the Han Dynasty, and the debts with the outside are generally the property of the family In that modern civil law, the debt between the civil subject and the outside is first paid in the form of personal property, and only in exceptional circumstances, the property of the family is the property of the family only when the personal property is insufficient to pay the debt. The main basis for dividing the capacity of civil conduct in the Han Dynasty is that of the family, only the identity of the head of the household can participate in the economic communication in the name of his own, and enjoy the rights and the shoes. The obligation of a person. A person, even if he is an adult, is not entitled to participate independently in a major passage if he is not a head of the household. In accordance with the nature of the subject matter, the article discusses the various kinds of purchase that we can see at present. The contract of sale and sale of the Han Dynasty has been relatively complete, both of which have the property of the sale of land and the purchase and sale of the real estate, as well as the action of the contract. The author has a macroscopic system analysis, a specific case study, and the program content of the purchase and sale contract. In the Han Dynasty, the system of the debt of the buying and selling of the debt has been fulfilled, the guarantee and the state Supervision and management system. The form of the elimination of the debt in the Han Dynasty is mainly To pay off and cancel the two kinds. The guarantee form of the debt in the Han Dynasty is also diversified, and its common form of guarantee is the credit guarantee, and there is also a flaw The guarantee and the pursuit of a guarantee, in which the credit guarantee is divided into the contract of credit and the sale on credit. The guarantee of the contract and the credit. The contract of credit and credit is the guarantor. The guarantee of the credit is the reputation of the state authority as a trade. The guarantee of the fulfillment of the debt. This reflects the high priority of the Han Dynasty to the creditor's debt The guarantee of economic benefit. The outstanding characteristics of the debt law in the Han Dynasty are reflected in the government of the Han Dynasty. From the static point of view, the management of the purchase and sale contract of the official government of the Han Dynasty is mainly embodied in the market The price of the product is specified. From the dynamic point of view, in the event of the debt, the official government has been actively involved in the performance of the debt, so as to ensure The Economic Interest of the Principal of the Debt. In the Han Dynasty, the Debt Law of the Han Dynasty is in China's Ancient Debt It holds an important position in the history of law. It is in the pre-Qin and down-the-start of the Jin and Tang dynasties. Compared with the pre-Qin period, the law of buying and selling bonds in the Han Dynasty has the advantages of the standardization of the content of the debt, the diversification of the subject matter of the debt and the diversification of the security of the debt. As can be seen from the parties involved in the buying and selling of the debt, the trading contract system, it can be seen that the law of the sale of the debt in the Jin and Tang Dynasty is for the Han Dynasty. The author puts forward the social function of the debt law in the Han Dynasty to three points: first, the contract of buying and selling the commodity exchange relationship breaks the identity limit, and promotes the development of the equality relation between the person and the person to a certain extent; secondly, the women can The parties to the contract have liberated the social productivity to a certain extent; in the end, the State's active intervention in the sale of the contract has maintained social stability and promoted The healthy development of the commodity economy. The law is not produced by the air. It reflects the development of a national material civilization and records the evolution of a national system civilization. The Chinese "ancient civil law", though not fully adapted to the needs of modern life, is formed in the long-term development of the Chinese society, carrying our people The value and order of the family. Yal. " trunk>. The remainder of the paper describes the author's experience in writing this paper,"
【學(xué)位授予單位】:鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2009
【分類號】:D929;D923
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 胡留元,馮卓慧;羅馬法與中國古代契約法[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1995年05期
2 羅海山,王一;中國古代田宅買賣契約的條款[J];大慶高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期
3 李玉生;;中國古代法與現(xiàn)代民法債和契約制度的比較研究[J];法學(xué)家;2005年05期
4 梁鳳榮;論中國古代買賣契約中擔(dān)保的形式與特色[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2005年04期
5 翟麥玲;漢代女子的經(jīng)濟(jì)活動[J];華南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2005年01期
6 姚桂芳;;江陵鳳凰山10號漢墓“中服共侍約”牘文新解[J];考古;1989年03期
7 朱江;李猹昭;倪振逵;張寄庵;;南京近郊六朝墓的清理[J];考古學(xué)報(bào);1957年01期
8 吳天穎;;漢代買地券考[J];考古學(xué)報(bào);1982年01期
9 李祝環(huán);中國傳統(tǒng)民事契約中的中人現(xiàn)象[J];法學(xué)研究;1997年06期
10 蔣維德;從漢律看我國古代的民事立法[J];內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1987年01期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 謝全發(fā);漢代債法研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2007年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 陳蘭蘭;漢代簡牘中的私文書研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2004年
,本文編號:2460739
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2460739.html