【摘要】： 隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易全球化的不斷發(fā)展,跨國(guó)企業(yè)成為全球經(jīng)濟(jì)一個(gè)不可忽視的重要組成部分。特別是在過去的幾十年間,跨國(guó)公司以其強(qiáng)大的資本實(shí)力和先進(jìn)的管理體系成為當(dāng)今國(guó)際貿(mào)易及投融資的主要力量。就在大量的跨國(guó)企業(yè)迅速在世界各國(guó)擴(kuò)張的同時(shí),也不斷地會(huì)有一些跨國(guó)企業(yè)陷入困境,出現(xiàn)生產(chǎn)經(jīng)營(yíng)困難,資金鏈斷裂,資不抵債等情形而申請(qǐng)破產(chǎn)。由于跨國(guó)企業(yè)本身的國(guó)際性決定了其破產(chǎn)訴訟的國(guó)際性,所以,此類案件并非某個(gè)國(guó)家有能力單獨(dú)予以妥善解決。在這樣的背景下,跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)案件的大量涌現(xiàn),使得國(guó)際社會(huì)不得不對(duì)其高度關(guān)注如何妥善地解決此類問題。 美國(guó)作為世界經(jīng)濟(jì)第一強(qiáng)國(guó),其經(jīng)濟(jì)成分中有大量跨國(guó)企業(yè)的存在,因此該國(guó)在對(duì)涉及跨國(guó)企業(yè)及其利益相關(guān)人的有關(guān)立法也是較為重視,該國(guó)在破產(chǎn)法律制度的立法方面一貫有著較為豐富的經(jīng)驗(yàn)。特別是在2005年,美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)通過并頒布施行的破產(chǎn)改革法案中涉及跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)國(guó)際合作方面的規(guī)定更是成為可供其他國(guó)家借鑒的框架性范本。 本文以該法案中關(guān)于跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)國(guó)際合作的規(guī)定為研究對(duì)象,并結(jié)合案例進(jìn)行分析,總結(jié)該法案的變革及啟示。筆者擬通過從各個(gè)角度對(duì)美國(guó)破產(chǎn)法跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)國(guó)際合作的法律制度規(guī)定加以比較和分析,并輔以實(shí)際案例,解析該法案的優(yōu)勢(shì)及不足,略成一管之見,以期對(duì)我國(guó)將來制定有關(guān)跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)法律規(guī)定有所助益。本文由三部分組成,第一章是美國(guó)破產(chǎn)法概覽,主要是介紹美國(guó)破產(chǎn)法的地位和作用以及其體例和結(jié)構(gòu),還簡(jiǎn)要介紹了美國(guó)破產(chǎn)法的淵源和歷史沿革。第二章探析美國(guó)破產(chǎn)法修正案第15章中關(guān)于跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)國(guó)際合作的規(guī)定。對(duì)美國(guó)破產(chǎn)法跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)國(guó)際合作改革法案的理論依據(jù)及國(guó)際背景進(jìn)行分析研究,并解析該改革法案創(chuàng)新性條款的規(guī)定及該法案的不足和優(yōu)勢(shì)以正確全面地認(rèn)識(shí)該法案。第三章是總結(jié)美國(guó)破產(chǎn)法律制度在國(guó)際合作方面的變革及啟示。
[Abstract]:With the continuous development of economic and trade globalization, multinational enterprises have become an important part of the global economy. Especially in the past few decades, multinational corporations have become the main force of international trade and investment and financing because of their strong capital strength and advanced management system. With the rapid expansion of a large number of multinational enterprises in the world, some multinational enterprises will continue to fall into difficulties, such as difficulties in production and operation, capital chain break, insolvent and so on, and file for bankruptcy. Since the internationality of multinational corporations determines the internationality of their insolvency proceedings, such cases are not capable of being properly resolved by a given country alone. In this context, the emergence of a large number of transnational insolvency cases, the international community has to pay great attention to how to properly solve such problems. As the world's largest economic power, the United States has a large number of multinational enterprises in its economic components, so it also attaches more importance to the relevant legislation concerning transnational enterprises and their stakeholders. The country has always had a wealth of experience in the legislative aspects of the bankruptcy legal system. Especially in 2005, the provisions of the bankruptcy Reform Act, which was passed and enacted by the United States Congress, related to international cooperation in transnational insolvency, became a frame model for other countries to learn from. This paper takes the provisions of international cooperation in transnational insolvency as the object of study, and analyzes the cases to summarize the reform and enlightenment of the bill. The author intends to compare and analyze the legal system provisions of international cooperation in transnational insolvency of the United States from various angles, and with practical cases, to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of the Act, and to be a bit of a point of view. In order to help our country to make relevant transnational insolvency laws and regulations in the future. This paper consists of three parts. The first chapter is an overview of American bankruptcy law, which mainly introduces the status and function of American bankruptcy law, its style and structure, and briefly introduces the origin and historical evolution of American bankruptcy law. The second chapter explores the international cooperation in transnational insolvency in Chapter 15 of the Amendment to the bankruptcy Law of the United States. This paper analyzes and studies the theoretical basis and international background of the International Cooperation Reform Act on Transnational bankruptcy Law of the United States, and analyzes the provisions of the innovative provisions of the Reform Act as well as the shortcomings and advantages of the Act in order to get a correct and comprehensive understanding of the Act. The third chapter summarizes the reform and enlightenment of American bankruptcy legal system in the aspect of international cooperation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2;DD912.29

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 殷慧芬;;美國(guó)破產(chǎn)法2005年修正案述評(píng)[J];比較法研究;2007年02期

2 韓長(zhǎng)印;破產(chǎn)清算人制度的若干問題[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年03期

3 于金葵;破產(chǎn)原因比較探析[J];內(nèi)蒙古經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年01期

4 蔡富生;;美國(guó)破產(chǎn)法中的幾種破產(chǎn)程序[J];國(guó)外法學(xué);1987年06期

5 江平;江帆;;論商自然人的破產(chǎn)能力[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1997年04期

6 汪世虎,李剛;自然人破產(chǎn)能力研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1999年06期

7 韓長(zhǎng)印;破產(chǎn)原因立法比較研究[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1998年03期

8 李國(guó)安;試論破產(chǎn)宣告的域外效力[J];廈門大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1995年04期

9 曹思源;破產(chǎn)法在中國(guó)的發(fā)展[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;1996年04期

10 潘華仿;美國(guó)的破產(chǎn)法[J];政法論壇;1986年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：2439722