“郭玉林等四人搶劫案”的案例分析
[Abstract]:In a large number of property crimes, joint crime is a relatively common situation. The usual cases of theft, robbery, fraud and so on are organized, premeditated, repeatedly committed group crimes. It is a very important part in the study of criminal law that involving a large number of perpetrators and complex crime circumstances. The application of law requires a large number of judicial interpretation and theoretical guidance. This article through a specific case of robbery to elaborate, first analysis of the trial process of the case and the basis of the judgment, and then focus on the biggest dispute in this case, that is, the scope of joint crime. However, I do not fully agree with the original verdict of the charges. The author believes that this case is complicated and should not be punished as a single crime of robbery. When the death caused by robbery is not much related to the act of means and the act of forcibly taking property in the crime of robbery, the act of death caused by the criminal can no longer be understood as an aggravating circumstance of the result of "robbery causing death" in the crime of robbery. Other crimes should be punished in conjunction with robbery. This paper is divided into five parts: the first part mainly introduces the basic facts of the robbery of Guo Yulin and others, and explains the focus of dispute and the result of judgment in the course of the case trial. For the theoretical discussion below to do a good job of the premise. The second part is the first key problem of this paper. The basic theory of joint principal offender is derived from the judgment basis, and the concept, nature, establishment condition and treatment principle of joint principal offender are analyzed in depth. And then to analyze the outcome of the entire case. The third part is the second key problem of this paper, according to the above theoretical analysis to explore the behavior of the four common principal offenders in the case and their respective legal liability. This leads to the problem of how to judge the guilt of each accomplice in the case of excess accomplice. The fourth part is a different opinion on the trial result of the case, which leads to some views of the author and a complete supplement to the analysis of the whole case. The last part is a summary of the case, and puts forward some immature thinking about the theory of criminal law and judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2010
【分類號】:D920.5
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 焦音凱;;共同犯罪中共同行為的認(rèn)定[J];法制與社會;2007年12期
2 安通;;論搶劫罪的司法認(rèn)定[J];法制與社會;2009年04期
3 張先欽;搶劫財物過程中致人死亡案件的定罪和處罰[J];中央政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;1996年03期
4 鄭鶴瑜;;過失共同正犯若干問題研究[J];河北法學(xué);2007年05期
5 劉洪佳;;共同犯罪中如何判定實行過限行為[J];黑河學(xué)刊;2009年04期
6 陳聰;;共同過失犯罪的比較法研究[J];黑龍江教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2007年07期
7 陳凌;;論共犯關(guān)系的脫離[J];中國檢察官;2007年01期
8 高強(qiáng);;關(guān)于搶劫罪“致人死亡”的三重解釋[J];吉林公安高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2007年04期
9 張明楷;論三角詐騙[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年02期
10 嵇明;搶劫罪中的致人死亡與故意殺人罪的界限[J];齊齊哈爾社會科學(xué);1989年01期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 常熟市檢察院 周建英;[N];江蘇法制報;2007年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前7條
1 周清水;共同正犯基本問題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2004年
2 錢曉峰;結(jié)果加重犯中的共同犯罪問題研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2002年
3 古亦楊;日本刑法共同正犯理論研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2005年
4 姚微;共同正犯理論若干問題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年
5 鐘斌;三角詐騙研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2006年
6 王金龍;共同正犯若干問題研究[D];山東大學(xué);2007年
7 焦云娜;共同犯罪未遂問題研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2007年
,本文編號:2420194
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2420194.html