【摘要】：正一、現(xiàn)實(shí)困境與追問:不可量物侵害補(bǔ)償?shù)闹贫日系K[案例1]A訴B環(huán)境衛(wèi)生管理處公廁臭氣污染、通風(fēng)、采光糾紛一案。原告孟某訴稱,被告B在A商品房后面僅1.3米處建造一處公廁,違反國家規(guī)定對(duì)公廁建筑與居民住宅之間距離不得低于50米的規(guī)定,公廁由于緊鄰原告的商品房,不僅嚴(yán)重影響原告的通風(fēng)、采光而且公廁發(fā)出的臭氣嚴(yán)重影響原告的正常生活,為此,起訴請(qǐng)求排除妨礙。被告B辯稱,該公廁是征詢住宅小區(qū)的大部分業(yè)主的意見并取得建設(shè)許可證的前提下在原老廁基礎(chǔ)上翻建而成,要拆除妨礙就必須拆除公廁,然而拆除公廁對(duì)小區(qū)的100多戶家中沒有廁所的業(yè)主帶來不便,100多戶業(yè)主不
[Abstract]:First, the realistic predicament and question: the system obstacle of immeasurable material infringement compensation [case 1] A v. B environmental health management office toilet stench pollution, ventilation, daylighting dispute case. Meng Mou, the plaintiff, claimed that defendant B built a public toilet just 1.3 meters behind the A commercial house, violating state regulations that the distance between the public toilet building and the residents' residence should not be less than 50 meters. The public toilet is next to the plaintiff's commercial house. Not only does it seriously affect the plaintiff's ventilation, lighting, but also the stench from the public toilet seriously affects the plaintiff's normal life. Defendant B argued that the public toilet had been rebuilt on the basis of the original old toilet in consultation with the majority of the owners of the residential area and obtained a construction permit, and that public toilets had to be removed in order to remove the obstructions. However, the demolition of public toilets has caused inconvenience to the owners of more than 100 households in the residential area who do not have toilets, and the owners of more than 100 households do not
【作者單位】： 江蘇省新沂市人民法院;
【分類號(hào)】：D920.5
，

本文編號(hào)：2400161