【摘要】： 審判權(quán)、監(jiān)決權(quán)、參與立法權(quán)是唐代大理寺所擁有的職權(quán),作為“守法之司”、“推鞫刑獄”的大理寺,審判職能無疑是其核心職能。大理寺官員作為“法官”之一對其受理的下至地方上報(bào)案件,上到皇帝交辦的案件,要遵循審限的要求,依據(jù)律令格式,以“推鞫得情,處斷平允”為最高標(biāo)準(zhǔn),對案件進(jìn)行審理。然而大理寺畢竟不是獨(dú)立的審判機(jī)構(gòu),在其職能具體運(yùn)作過程中受到各種制度及非制度因素的影響,在封建的皇權(quán)控制下,職官體系包圍中,各種權(quán)力的交織下,大理寺作為全國最高審判機(jī)構(gòu)卻不享有最高審判權(quán)。但在大理寺的審判職能的實(shí)際運(yùn)作中,卻也體現(xiàn)著中國古代法制細(xì)節(jié)之處的優(yōu)長。
[Abstract]:The judicial power, the executive power and the legislative power are the functions and powers of the Dali Temple in the Tang Dynasty. As a "law-abiding department" and "a criminal prison", the trial function of the Dali Temple is undoubtedly its core function. As one of the "judges," officials of the Dali Temple report cases to the lower and local authorities they accept, and to the cases assigned by the emperor, they should follow the requirements of trial and order, and according to the form of laws and decrees, the highest standard should be "to push the situation, to deal with the situation, and to deal with the denial of justice" as the highest standard. Try the case. However, Dali Temple is not an independent judicial institution after all. It is influenced by various institutional and non-institutional factors in the specific operation of its functions. Under the control of feudal imperial power and surrounded by the official system, various powers are intertwined. Dali Temple, as the highest judicial institution in the country, does not enjoy the highest judicial power. However, in the actual operation of Dali Temple's judicial function, it also reflects the advantages and disadvantages of the legal details of ancient China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D929

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉磊;唐代大理寺司法審判制度研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：2313454