論法律對媒體監(jiān)督權(quán)的規(guī)范
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-10-31 07:13
【摘要】: 在我國,隨著法治建設(shè)的不斷推進(jìn),媒體輿論監(jiān)督的作用受到越來越多的關(guān)注。但媒體監(jiān)督權(quán)是一柄雙刃劍,任何一種權(quán)力(利)都有濫用的可能性。因此,在保障媒體監(jiān)督權(quán)有效行使的同時(shí),必須加強(qiáng)和完善對媒體監(jiān)督權(quán)的法律規(guī)范。本課題的研究對于規(guī)范媒體監(jiān)督權(quán)的行使,使其發(fā)揮正面作用有著重要的理論價(jià)值和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。從理論上來說,大多數(shù)學(xué)者談及媒體監(jiān)督都是將其作為一種制度,作為輿論監(jiān)督的一部分,很少從權(quán)力(利)角度對其進(jìn)行正面的研究,因此,在學(xué)術(shù)上,對媒體監(jiān)督權(quán)并沒有一個(gè)確切的、權(quán)威的定義。本文從媒體監(jiān)督權(quán)的屬性出發(fā)對其進(jìn)行界定,從而得出一個(gè)相對全面的概念。另外,本文從法理與現(xiàn)實(shí)意義兩個(gè)層面探究法律規(guī)范媒體監(jiān)督權(quán)行使的必要性,并且立足理論與實(shí)務(wù),對法律規(guī)范媒體監(jiān)督權(quán)行使的路徑進(jìn)行構(gòu)建。本文綜合運(yùn)用價(jià)值分析法、文獻(xiàn)研究法、歷史研究法、比較研究法以及案例研究法。通過這些研究方法的運(yùn)用,本文得出了對媒體監(jiān)督權(quán)的行使進(jìn)行規(guī)范的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義;得出法律對媒體監(jiān)督權(quán)的行使進(jìn)行規(guī)范的應(yīng)然狀態(tài),確定了規(guī)范的限度問題;得出了法律規(guī)范媒體監(jiān)督權(quán)行使的具體途徑和方法。
[Abstract]:In our country, with the development of the rule of law, more and more attention has been paid to the role of media supervision. But the power of media supervision is a double-edged sword, any kind of power has the possibility of abuse. Therefore, while ensuring the effective exercise of media supervision, we must strengthen and perfect the legal norms of media supervision. The research of this subject has important theoretical value and practical significance for standardizing the exercise of media supervision power and making it play a positive role. In theory, most scholars talk about media supervision as a system, as a part of public opinion supervision, and rarely do positive research on it from the perspective of power (profit), therefore, in the academic, There is no definitive, authoritative definition of media supervision. This paper defines the media supervision power from its attributes, and draws a relatively comprehensive concept. In addition, this paper probes into the necessity of the exercise of media supervision by law from two aspects of legal theory and practical significance, and based on theory and practice, constructs the path of exercising media supervision. This paper uses value analysis method, literature research method, historical research method, comparative research method and case study method. Through the application of these research methods, this paper obtains the practical significance of standardizing the exercise of the media supervision power, and concludes that the law should regulate the exercise of the media supervision power and determine the limitation of the norms. The specific ways and methods of regulating the exercise of media supervision power by law are obtained.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2010
【分類號】:D920.0
[Abstract]:In our country, with the development of the rule of law, more and more attention has been paid to the role of media supervision. But the power of media supervision is a double-edged sword, any kind of power has the possibility of abuse. Therefore, while ensuring the effective exercise of media supervision, we must strengthen and perfect the legal norms of media supervision. The research of this subject has important theoretical value and practical significance for standardizing the exercise of media supervision power and making it play a positive role. In theory, most scholars talk about media supervision as a system, as a part of public opinion supervision, and rarely do positive research on it from the perspective of power (profit), therefore, in the academic, There is no definitive, authoritative definition of media supervision. This paper defines the media supervision power from its attributes, and draws a relatively comprehensive concept. In addition, this paper probes into the necessity of the exercise of media supervision by law from two aspects of legal theory and practical significance, and based on theory and practice, constructs the path of exercising media supervision. This paper uses value analysis method, literature research method, historical research method, comparative research method and case study method. Through the application of these research methods, this paper obtains the practical significance of standardizing the exercise of the media supervision power, and concludes that the law should regulate the exercise of the media supervision power and determine the limitation of the norms. The specific ways and methods of regulating the exercise of media supervision power by law are obtained.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2010
【分類號】:D920.0
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 五岳散人;;負(fù)面新聞為何總在墻外[J];晚報(bào)文萃;2011年19期
2 張宇飛;;媒體監(jiān)督對刑事審判的影響分析[J];知識經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年16期
3 李靚;;我國行政公益訴訟原告資格問題探究[J];湖北經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會科學(xué)版);2011年07期
4 張玉勝;;媒體監(jiān)督不應(yīng)失“理性”[J];w,
本文編號:2301359
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2301359.html