《上海地方審判廳司法實(shí)記》中的民事案例淺析
[Abstract]:The main research document of this paper is the case journal published by Huang Qinglan in the first year of the Republic of China, "the actual Records of Justice in Shanghai Local judgment Hall" (hereafter referred to as "Judicial Records"), which is a compilation of the trial of local people by the Shanghai Primary Court and the local courtroom. The adjudicative documents made in criminal cases, including judgments and judgments, involved a wide variety of subjects and complicated types of cases. [judicial record] was published only in the first year of the Republic of China, that is, in 1912, and was published in eight issues, each of which was divided into four parts, according to "the local people," "Criminal judgment", "junior parlour, criminal judgment", "local magistrate, criminal criticism", "junior hall, criminal criticism" in the order of various documents. The object of my research is the civil cases, including the local and primary offices of the civil judgment and criticism, hoping that in the specific text of the content of the research process, the judge's reasons for judgment and psychological appeal to a certain extent. The text of this paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter gives a general introduction to the origin and value of the judicial record, and makes a general comment on the judgment and criticism of the judicial record from the aspects of the editor Huang Qinglan's life, historical background, case form, and so on. It also shows the author's research scope, research method and basic foothold. The second chapter specifically introduces the civil judgments in the "actual Records of Justice", first from the statistics and induction of the number of cases, to get the overall impression, then according to the field house, money debt, household marriage, inheritance, other classification criteria will be classified cases, The method of illustration is used to discuss the characteristics of the case content and the judge's judgment psychology one by one. In the third chapter, the author makes great efforts to discuss the source of law in the Book of Judicial Records. First, the author analyzes the meaning of the source of law theoretically, then according to statistics, according to the law, habits, In the order of order, the author expounds the sources of law involved in the record of Judicial practice, which is supported by the confirmation of one case, and tries to be accurate and detailed. In the fourth chapter, in order to deepen and theorize the research results, the author raises the focus of the discussion to the judges' legal consciousness and value demand, starting from the judge's candidate's quality. Combined with the principles of adjudication embodied in the judicial documents, such as freedom of contract, good faith, mediation of interest and litigation, this paper tries to find out that the judge is introducing various kinds of western modern judicial spirit at the same time. What kind of psychological expectation and value demand exist in its inner heart, so as to better understand the intention and goal of judge trial cases. The basic material studied in this paper is "Judicial Records", whose characteristics of the times are the key points of its special research value. Therefore, in addition to the direct content arrangement, it is still necessary to take into account the various research results on the judicial system in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China. This paper probes into the emergence, vicissitude and extinction of various judicial systems in the specific period of China. Therefore, the method of contrast in this paper is another important method in addition to hermeneutics. The basic purpose of this study is to "discern knowledge", that is to say, it is hoped that the judicial trial situation in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China will be reflected with the judicial reform still under way today, draw lessons and draw lessons from the advantages, so as to better guide the judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:復(fù)旦大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D929
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張文勇;;論判例在中國(guó)古代法律中的作用[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2011年05期
2 趙勇;;91億港幣一堂課[J];戀愛(ài)婚姻家庭(青春);2011年08期
3 蕭瀚;;美國(guó)刑事司法中的非法證據(jù)排除規(guī)則[J];中國(guó)改革;2010年07期
4 王蓉霞;;論法律情感[J];中小企業(yè)管理與科技(下旬刊);2011年07期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前6條
1 曹心瑋;;《紅樓夢(mèng)》判詞翻譯分析[A];福建省外國(guó)語(yǔ)文學(xué)會(huì)2010年年會(huì)論文集[C];2010年
2 胡如雷;;兩件敦煌出土的判牒文書(shū)所反映的社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況[A];唐史論叢(第二輯)[C];1987年
3 ;一字拾趣[A];中國(guó)生理學(xué)會(huì)第22屆全國(guó)代表大會(huì)暨中國(guó)生理學(xué)會(huì)成立80周年學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文集[C];2006年
4 曹婷婷;;個(gè)案視角下晚清江浙鄉(xiāng)村地區(qū)婚姻的締結(jié)與離棄——以清代刑科題本為例[A];滿學(xué)論叢(第一輯)[C];2011年
5 王祥;;遼海講壇第二十二講 《紅樓夢(mèng)》人物漫談:秦可卿[A];遼寧省社會(huì)科學(xué)普及系列叢書(shū)4——遼海講壇·第二輯(文學(xué)卷)[C];2008年
6 支果;張?zhí)旒t;;自貢鹽業(yè)訴訟契約例析[A];鹽文化研究論叢(第三輯)[C];2008年
相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條
1 陳繼平;理想的判詞[N];人民法院報(bào);2001年
2 北京市延慶縣人民法院 李雙;古代判詞的現(xiàn)代啟示[N];人民法院報(bào);2011年
3 徐愛(ài)國(guó);“大學(xué)生懷孕案”的判詞旁語(yǔ)[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2002年
4 潘慶云;給香港大法官講中文“判詞”[N];聯(lián)合時(shí)報(bào);2002年
5 本報(bào)記者 徐嶄;上訴法庭否決 電訊盈科私有化難了[N];上海證券報(bào);2009年
6 李昌盛;判詞文化與法官選拔[N];人民法院報(bào);2006年
7 吳鏡水;用駢體文寫(xiě)判詞的紹興師爺[N];北京日?qǐng)?bào);2007年
8 趙曉耕 馬曉莉;宋代典權(quán)糾紛案件解讀[N];人民法院報(bào);2004年
9 王玉林;《紅樓夢(mèng)》是隱秘曹家歷史的小說(shuō)考證[N];中華讀書(shū)報(bào);2004年
10 王 毅;判決書(shū)中的情、理、法[N];人民法院報(bào);2003年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 趙靜;司法判詞的表達(dá)與實(shí)踐——以古代判詞為中心[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2004年
2 劉小明;唐宋判文研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2012年
3 田荔枝;我國(guó)判詞語(yǔ)體流變研究[D];山東大學(xué);2010年
4 譚淑娟;唐代判文研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2009年
5 何蕾;唐代文人與法律[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2008年
6 夏婷婷;唐代擬制判決中的法律發(fā)現(xiàn)[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年
7 付興林;白居易散文研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2006年
8 楊曉莉;20世紀(jì)上半葉陜西地區(qū)法學(xué)思想與法學(xué)實(shí)踐研究[D];西北大學(xué);2010年
9 崔明石;話語(yǔ)與敘事:文化視域下的情理法[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年
10 趙旭;法律制度與唐宋社會(huì)秩序[D];東北師范大學(xué);2006年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 周圣;《上海地方審判廳司法實(shí)記》中的民事案例淺析[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2010年
2 張威;中國(guó)古代判詞研究特色與作用淺析[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年
3 李麗平;元雜劇判詞研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2010年
4 高見(jiàn);從《名公書(shū)判清明集》看宋代判詞的特點(diǎn)和精神指向[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年
5 李雯瑾;清末民初的縣知事審判研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年
6 展凌;明清判詞研究[D];山東大學(xué);2006年
7 邱勝俠;白居易《甲乙判》研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年
8 潘峰;《龍筋鳳髓判》律文探析[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年
9 吳娟;白居易《百道判》與《唐律疏議》及儒家經(jīng)典對(duì)應(yīng)研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年
10 鄭R,
本文編號(hào):2293175
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2293175.html