考夫曼法律現(xiàn)實化理論探析
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-25 06:41
【摘要】： 2001年4月11日,阿圖爾.考夫曼逝世于德國慕尼黑,享年78歲�？挤蚵壬堑聡姆ㄕ軐W領(lǐng)域以及刑法學領(lǐng)域的專家,他的去世使法學界失去了一位一流研究者。 筆者認為考夫曼法律思想體系在我國法理學的研究中還屬于比較初步的階段,其中蘊含的豐富的、價值的理念還有待更多的學者加以深入的剖析。自古以來,我國的法律思維模式都未取得重大的突破,一直沿襲使用傳統(tǒng)的形式邏輯的思維方式來推導法律,運用籠統(tǒng)的非此即彼的絕對化的價值觀念來適用法律。這些年來,隨著我國法學家對于法律類型思維理論的理解的深入,我們開始逐漸認識到,適用法律規(guī)則時,除了形而上的精確、嚴密化的思維模式之外,我們還需要把法學、法律思考與實際的生活相聯(lián)系,以避免單純的依靠邏輯而得出極端的判決。 傳統(tǒng)上類推僅僅是法律適用的補充性技術(shù),而考夫曼在詮釋學的關(guān)照下主張所有的法律適用都是類推的過程。沒有完全相同的案件,法律適用就是規(guī)范與事實不斷逼近的過程,只有在規(guī)范與事實的對應中才有真實的法。類推的過程可以通過考察規(guī)范與事實的共有意義、回歸立法目的和判斷相似性等方式來操作,從而實現(xiàn)類推從本體論到方法論的轉(zhuǎn)換。 筆者試圖突破以純理論的層面剖析考夫曼的法律現(xiàn)實化理論,文章加以諸多的疑難案件,這些案件大多是需要法官的結(jié)合“類推”的思維推論模式才能加以判決。文章試圖通過這些案例的分析,具體剖析考夫曼法律現(xiàn)實化理論之精華,讓這一理論從學術(shù)層面向司法實踐層面接軌,試圖尋找出該理論中的實踐意義,同時加以運用到中國的實際審判中。這不僅是本文的創(chuàng)新點,也是本文的難點所在。
[Abstract]:April 11, 2001, Atul. Kaufman died at the age of 78 in Munich, Germany. Kaufmann is a famous German expert in the field of philosophy of law and criminal law. The author thinks that Kaufman's legal thought system is still a preliminary stage in the study of jurisprudence in our country, and the rich and valuable ideas contained therein need to be deeply analyzed by more scholars. Since ancient times, the mode of legal thinking in our country has not made any significant breakthrough. It has always followed the traditional thinking mode of formal logic to deduce the law, and to apply the law by using the general absolute values of either or one or the other. Over the years, with the deepening understanding of the legal type thinking theory among Chinese jurists, we have gradually realized that, in addition to the metaphysical precise and rigorous thinking mode, we also need to apply the law to the law. Legal thinking is linked to actual life in order to avoid relying solely on logic to reach extreme judgments. Traditionally, analogies are only complementary techniques for the application of law, while Kaufman argues that all legal application is a process of analogy under the care of hermeneutics. There is no identical case, the application of law is the process of norm and fact approaching constantly, only in the correspondence between norm and fact can there be real law. The process of analogies can be operated by examining the common meaning of norms and facts, returning legislative purpose and judging similarity, so as to realize the transformation of analogy from ontology to methodology. The author tries to break through Kaufman's theory of legal reality on the level of pure theory, and make a lot of difficult cases, most of which need the judge's "analogy" mode of thinking in order to be judged. This paper attempts to analyze the essence of Kaufman's theory of legal reality through the analysis of these cases, so that the theory can be connected from the academic level to the judicial practice level, and try to find out the practical significance of the theory. At the same time, it is applied to the actual trial in China. This is not only the innovation of this paper, but also the difficulty of this paper.
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D90
本文編號：2292931
[Abstract]:April 11, 2001, Atul. Kaufman died at the age of 78 in Munich, Germany. Kaufmann is a famous German expert in the field of philosophy of law and criminal law. The author thinks that Kaufman's legal thought system is still a preliminary stage in the study of jurisprudence in our country, and the rich and valuable ideas contained therein need to be deeply analyzed by more scholars. Since ancient times, the mode of legal thinking in our country has not made any significant breakthrough. It has always followed the traditional thinking mode of formal logic to deduce the law, and to apply the law by using the general absolute values of either or one or the other. Over the years, with the deepening understanding of the legal type thinking theory among Chinese jurists, we have gradually realized that, in addition to the metaphysical precise and rigorous thinking mode, we also need to apply the law to the law. Legal thinking is linked to actual life in order to avoid relying solely on logic to reach extreme judgments. Traditionally, analogies are only complementary techniques for the application of law, while Kaufman argues that all legal application is a process of analogy under the care of hermeneutics. There is no identical case, the application of law is the process of norm and fact approaching constantly, only in the correspondence between norm and fact can there be real law. The process of analogies can be operated by examining the common meaning of norms and facts, returning legislative purpose and judging similarity, so as to realize the transformation of analogy from ontology to methodology. The author tries to break through Kaufman's theory of legal reality on the level of pure theory, and make a lot of difficult cases, most of which need the judge's "analogy" mode of thinking in order to be judged. This paper attempts to analyze the essence of Kaufman's theory of legal reality through the analysis of these cases, so that the theory can be connected from the academic level to the judicial practice level, and try to find out the practical significance of the theory. At the same time, it is applied to the actual trial in China. This is not only the innovation of this paper, but also the difficulty of this paper.
【學位授予單位】：上海師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D90
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)博士學位論文 前2條
1 王虹霞;司法過程中的利益衡量[D];吉林大學;2010年
2 王國龍;法律解釋的有效性問題研究[D];山東大學;2010年
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條
1 葉盈盈;考夫曼法律現(xiàn)實化理論探析[D];上海師范大學;2010年
，本文編號：2292931
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2292931.html
