【摘要】：歐洲的孤兒作品問(wèn)題解決方案僅針對(duì)公共文化機(jī)構(gòu),且有公共借閱權(quán)、著作權(quán)集體管理延伸、著作權(quán)補(bǔ)償金等配套制度,因此歐盟《孤兒作品指令》之通過(guò)相對(duì)順利;而美國(guó)的孤兒作品方案嘗試解決商業(yè)性使用中"找不到權(quán)利人"洽談這一"市場(chǎng)失靈"問(wèn)題,欲設(shè)立一種類似強(qiáng)制許可的制度以限制權(quán)利人可依法獲得的救濟(jì),這一方案觸動(dòng)了版權(quán)法根基,故其《孤兒作品法案》一直處于討論狀態(tài)。我國(guó)《著作權(quán)法》第三次修改增加了關(guān)于孤兒作品問(wèn)題的規(guī)定,這一思路類似美國(guó)方案而相對(duì)粗略,其合理性和可行性需要進(jìn)一步論證。
[Abstract]:The solutions to the problems of orphans' works in Europe are only for public cultural institutions, and have the public borrowing right, the extension of collective management of copyright, copyright compensation and other supporting systems, so the EU Directive on Orphan works has passed relatively smoothly. The orphan works program in the United States tries to solve the "market failure" problem of "unable to find the right holder" in commercial use, and wants to set up a system similar to compulsory licensing to limit the relief that the right holder can obtain according to the law. This proposal touched the foundation of copyright law, so its Orphan works Act has been under discussion. The third revision of the copyright Law of our country has added provisions on the problem of orphan works, which is similar to the American scheme and relatively rough, and its rationality and feasibility need to be further demonstrated.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院法學(xué)研究所;
【分類號(hào)】：D95;D971.2;D923.41

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李江麗;;英國(guó)為公共文化機(jī)構(gòu)使用版權(quán)的立法與評(píng)述[J];蘭臺(tái)世界;2010年04期

2 ;[J];;年期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：2211099