【摘要】： 律師業(yè)MDP問(wèn)題在美國(guó)已經(jīng)得以廣泛討論,本文詳盡介紹了律師業(yè)MDP問(wèn)題的背景、概念、結(jié)構(gòu)類型以及有關(guān)MDP問(wèn)題爭(zhēng)論的主要觀點(diǎn),在此基礎(chǔ)上,運(yùn)用職業(yè)社會(huì)學(xué)的“市場(chǎng)控制論”及“職業(yè)系統(tǒng)論”對(duì)此進(jìn)行了分析,通過(guò)分析闡明了MDP現(xiàn)象產(chǎn)生的原因以及未來(lái)的發(fā)展趨勢(shì)。本文共分為四部分,主要內(nèi)容如下: 第一部分詳細(xì)梳理了MDP現(xiàn)象在美國(guó)律師業(yè)的相關(guān)背景、分析了美國(guó)律師協(xié)會(huì)對(duì)MDP的定義及分類,具體包括合作模式、支配與控制模式、商業(yè)輔助性模式、協(xié)議模式、完全結(jié)合模式共五種,并對(duì)美國(guó)當(dāng)前有關(guān)MDP規(guī)制的規(guī)則進(jìn)行了逐一分析,較全面地概括了MDP問(wèn)題在美國(guó)的現(xiàn)狀。 第二部分著重介紹了MDP贊成者及反對(duì)者雙方在律師職業(yè)獨(dú)立性、保密性、利益沖突及規(guī)制等方面的爭(zhēng)論意見(jiàn),進(jìn)一步將MDP問(wèn)題的分析引向深入。MDP反對(duì)者們認(rèn)為,律師在非律師職業(yè)人員監(jiān)管之下工作無(wú)疑會(huì)影響其職業(yè)判斷,律師獨(dú)立性的程度與非律師職業(yè)人員對(duì)合伙組織控制的嚴(yán)密程度成反比。在MDP環(huán)境中,由于不同行業(yè)對(duì)于委托人信息的保密性要求不同,委托人的保密性信息會(huì)處于更為危險(xiǎn)的境地�；谠贛DP中各種資源的共享關(guān)系,不同成員之間可能會(huì)彼此施加各種影響,這就容易造成一職業(yè)成員對(duì)客戶義務(wù)與對(duì)其他職業(yè)成員義務(wù)的緊張與沖突。他們進(jìn)而認(rèn)為并不存在統(tǒng)一的MDP規(guī)制標(biāo)準(zhǔn),甚至對(duì)其進(jìn)行有效管理也是不可能的。而MDP的贊成者則從客戶需求、提高服務(wù)效率、減少服務(wù)費(fèi)用及捍衛(wèi)行業(yè)領(lǐng)域方面提出了支持意見(jiàn)。 第三部分分別運(yùn)用了“市場(chǎng)控制論”及“職業(yè)系統(tǒng)論”對(duì)MDP問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了理論層面的分析,前一理論著重從法律職業(yè)對(duì)產(chǎn)品的生產(chǎn)、職業(yè)追求“社會(huì)封閉”(social closure)的努力、“集體性流動(dòng)”(collective mobility)、對(duì)生產(chǎn)者行為控制、創(chuàng)造需求五個(gè)方面進(jìn)行了分析,得出MDP問(wèn)題的出現(xiàn)是律師業(yè)內(nèi)生應(yīng)激性的一種反應(yīng)。后一理論從系統(tǒng)紊亂及職業(yè)區(qū)域爭(zhēng)奪的角度進(jìn)行了分析,交代了律師業(yè)外部其他行業(yè)的刺激性,兩方面的分析較為完整的剖析了MDP問(wèn)題背后的深層原因,將問(wèn)題的爭(zhēng)論深入至職業(yè)范式本質(zhì)層面。 第四部分總結(jié)了前文的分析,并對(duì)中國(guó)律師業(yè)的現(xiàn)狀及問(wèn)題做出了審慎展望,指出采納適合中國(guó)國(guó)情的職業(yè)范式將會(huì)促進(jìn)中國(guó)律師業(yè)的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:The MDP problem of lawyer industry has been extensively discussed in the United States. This paper introduces the background, concept, structure type and main viewpoints of the MDP problem in detail. In this paper, the market cybernetics and the occupational system theory of vocational sociology are used to analyze the causes of MDP phenomenon and the development trend in the future. This paper is divided into four parts. The main contents are as follows: the first part analyzes the background of MDP phenomenon in American lawyers industry, and analyzes the definition and classification of MDP by American Bar Association, including the cooperation mode. There are five modes of domination and control, commercial auxiliary mode, agreement mode and complete combination mode. The current MDP regulation rules in the United States are analyzed one by one, and the present situation of MDP problem in the United States is summarized comprehensively. In the second part, the author mainly introduces the opinions of the pros and cons of the MDP on the independence, confidentiality, conflict of interest and regulation of the lawyer profession, and further leads the analysis of the MDP problem to the opinion of the opponents of .MDP. The degree of lawyers' independence is inversely proportional to the degree of non-lawyer 's strict control of the partnership organization. In MDP environment, due to the different requirements for the confidentiality of client information in different industries, the confidential information of the client will be in a more dangerous situation. Based on the sharing of various resources in MDP, different members may exert various influences on each other, which can easily lead to the tension and conflict between the obligations of one professional member to the customer and the obligation to other professional members. They think that there is no uniform standard of MDP regulation, and it is impossible to manage it effectively. The proponents of MDP offer support opinions on customer demand, improving service efficiency, reducing service costs and defending the industry. In the third part, the author analyzes the problem of MDP from the perspective of "market cybernetics" and "occupational system theory" respectively. The former theory focuses on the production of products in the legal profession and the pursuit of "social closed" (social closure) in the profession. "Collective flow" (collective mobility),) analyzes five aspects of producer behavior control and demand creation. It is concluded that the emergence of MDP problem is a response to endogenous stress in the legal profession. The latter theory makes an analysis from the angle of system disorder and occupation area competition, explains the stimulation of other industries outside the lawyer industry, and the deep reasons behind the MDP problem are analyzed completely in two aspects. The debate goes deep into the essential level of the career paradigm. The fourth part summarizes the previous analysis, and makes a prudent outlook on the current situation and problems of China's lawyer industry, and points out that adopting the professional paradigm suitable for China's national conditions will promote the development of China's lawyer industry.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2;DD916.5

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 梁良;試論英國(guó)新型律師事務(wù)所及對(duì)我國(guó)的借鑒意義[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：2192353