【摘要】： 本文由五個部分組成。其中,引言部分第一節(jié)介紹了研究問題在于通過目的解釋方法的適用,如何使法律文本的主觀目的與客觀目的相融合,而當二者發(fā)生沖突的情形時,應當優(yōu)先選擇主觀目的,但是客觀目的在特定情形下可以具有更強分量。第二節(jié)對文章的研究進路做了具體說明。 第一章是關于目的解釋的基本內涵,目的解釋的目標是實現(xiàn)法律文本意欲實現(xiàn)之目的,而此目的是建立在文本作者意圖與法律體系之意圖基礎上的。目的解釋作為一種解釋方法,在確定案件所適用的法律規(guī)范過程中,即在尋找大前提的過程中,目的解釋通過有機融合法規(guī)之主觀目的與客觀目的,能夠為法官對所確定適用的法律規(guī)范提供有力的證成。此外,融合了主觀性與客觀性的目的解釋,可以有效避免主觀目的解釋學說與客觀目的解釋學說單獨適用時的偏頗。 第二章是目的解釋的適用基礎,即如何確定法律文本的主觀目的與客觀目的,共分為三節(jié)來討論。法律文本的語義學上的意義是目的解釋的方向指標,同時劃定了解釋的界限;按照法律文本類型的不同,其各自的主觀目的各有不同的表述形式,并重點討論了成文法規(guī)的主觀目的——立法者意圖;文本的客觀目的是解釋者所預設的目的,反映了既定時間內、既定的社會需求。客觀目的之內容不是固定不變的,其具體意義取決于作出解釋時的利益、價值等等。 第三章進入到目的解釋適用準則的問題研究中,第一節(jié)討論了目的解釋的適用標準,目的解釋方法應當實現(xiàn)法律決定的可預測性與可接受性,而第二節(jié)討論了目的解釋適用準則的獨特性,法律文本的主觀目的、客觀目的轉化為可以辯駁的命題,目的解釋最重要的任務就在于有機融合這些主觀目的、客觀目的。當此二者發(fā)生沖突時,主觀目的具有優(yōu)先考量的決定地位,但是只是相對的,在特定情形下客觀目的得到更有利理由支持,其分量重于主觀目的。 結語部分指出法律解釋的重要意義在于研究解釋方法的具體適用,在目的解釋看來,法律解釋的過程是從法律文本的語義學意義中抽取出法律意義,此過程需要綜合考量主觀目的與客觀目的。
[Abstract]:This paper consists of five parts. The first section of the introduction introduces the problem of how to combine the subjective purpose and objective purpose of the legal text through the application of the method of purpose interpretation, and when the two conflicts, the subjective purpose should be preferred. But the objective purpose can have a stronger component under certain circumstances. The second section makes a specific explanation to the research route of the article. Chapter one is about the basic connotation of Skopos interpretation, the aim of which is to realize the intention of the legal text, which is based on the intention of the author of the text and the intention of the legal system. Objective interpretation as a method of interpretation, in the process of determining the legal norms applicable to the case, that is, in the process of searching for the major premise, the purpose of interpretation through the organic integration of the subjective and objective purposes of laws and regulations. Be able to provide strong evidence for the judge to determine the applicable legal norms. In addition, the objective interpretation of subjectivity and objectivity can effectively avoid the bias between the subjective purpose interpretation theory and the objective purpose interpretation theory. The second chapter is the application basis of the purpose explanation, that is, how to determine the subjective purpose and objective purpose of the legal text, which is divided into three sections to discuss. The semantic meaning of the legal text is the directional index of the purpose interpretation, and at the same time it delimits the boundary of the interpretation, according to the different types of the legal text, its subjective purpose has different forms of expression. The objective purpose of the text is the presupposition of the interpreter and reflects the established social needs within a given period of time, and the paper focuses on the subjective purpose of the written law, the intention of the legislator, and the objective purpose of the text, which is the presupposition of the interpreter. The content of objective purpose is not fixed, its specific meaning depends on the interest, value and so on. Chapter III enters into the study of the criteria for the application of the purpose interpretation. Section I discusses the applicable criteria for the purpose interpretation, and the method of purpose interpretation should achieve the predictability and acceptability of legal decisions. The second section discusses the uniqueness of the criterion of purpose interpretation, the subjective purpose of the legal text, and the objective purpose transformed into a refutable proposition. The most important task of the purpose interpretation lies in the organic integration of these subjective purposes and objective purposes. When the two conflicts, the subjective purpose has the decisive position of priority, but only relatively, the objective purpose is supported by more favorable reasons under certain circumstances, and its weight is more important than the subjective purpose. The conclusion points out that the significance of legal interpretation lies in the concrete application of interpretation methods. In the view of purpose interpretation, the process of legal interpretation is to extract the legal meaning from the semantic meaning of the legal text. This process requires comprehensive consideration of subjective and objective purposes.
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D90

【引證文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 王宜珂;;淺析法律解釋的漏洞補充功能[J];商業(yè)文化(上半月);2011年07期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 李元媛;論刑事審判中的目的解釋[D];蘇州大學;2011年

2 郭瑞蓮;條約目的解釋方法在WTO框架下的適用研究[D];山東大學;2012年

，

本文編號：2181837