【摘要】：近年來,世界各國特別是美中兩國發(fā)明專利申請和授權(quán)數(shù)量迅猛增加,專利叢林效應(yīng)開始顯現(xiàn),專利實(shí)施困難,我國也出現(xiàn)了非正常申請的行為,種種跡象表明專利權(quán)過多、過密已經(jīng)導(dǎo)致了專利權(quán)的種種沖突,引發(fā)了其他一系列諸如專利授權(quán)質(zhì)量下降、甚至專利投機(jī)行為等問題,專利制度危機(jī)的論調(diào)開始蔓延。 基于此,本文首先從美中兩國取得專利權(quán)的現(xiàn)狀入手,介紹了美中兩個(gè)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)大國基于專利權(quán)激增導(dǎo)致權(quán)利沖突的一些問題。其次,系統(tǒng)梳理了美中兩國防止權(quán)利沖突制度各自龐雜的規(guī)定及相關(guān)表現(xiàn),重點(diǎn)分析了防止權(quán)利沖突制度下的抵觸申請、重復(fù)授權(quán)及其相互關(guān)系。再次,為避免兩國先發(fā)明和先申請制度的差異,將美國推定發(fā)明日的有效申請日與中國申請日對應(yīng)為基礎(chǔ)、假設(shè)沒有其它證據(jù)推翻其推定發(fā)明日為前提,從而得出了兩國防止權(quán)利沖突制度之間的差異。最后,根據(jù)上述差異并結(jié)合我國防止權(quán)利沖突的現(xiàn)行制度,從審查的程序和實(shí)體兩方面給出了防止權(quán)利沖突制度的具體措施和建議,主要通過澄清解釋的方式完善時(shí)限和流程方面的程序規(guī)定,通過同時(shí)提升抵觸申請和重復(fù)授權(quán)的審查標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的實(shí)體規(guī)定,并輔以配套措施,使之彼此統(tǒng)一并與后續(xù)司法程序統(tǒng)一。 上述具體的措施及建議有助于逐步提升專利權(quán)之間的區(qū)別,減小專利權(quán)家族的尺寸,避免專利權(quán)過差、過多,有效防止專權(quán)利之間的相互沖突,進(jìn)而某種程度上避免不公地延長專利權(quán)的保護(hù)期限和濫用專利權(quán),發(fā)揮專利制度的激勵(lì)作用,具有一定的實(shí)踐操作性和理論前瞻性。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the number of patent applications and authorizations for invention in countries all over the world, especially in the United States and China, has increased rapidly, the patent jungle effect has begun to appear, the implementation of patents is difficult, and there have also been abnormal applications in our country. All kinds of indications show that there are too many patent rights. Overtightness has led to various conflicts of patent rights, caused a series of other problems such as the quality of patent licensing, even patent speculation, and the theory of patent system crisis began to spread. Based on this, this paper begins with the current situation of patent rights obtained by the United States and China, and introduces some problems caused by the conflict of rights caused by the surge of patent rights in the two major intellectual property countries of the United States and China. Secondly, it systematically combs the various regulations and related performances of the system of preventing the conflict of rights between the United States and China, focusing on the analysis of the conflict application, repeated authorization and their relationship under the system of preventing the conflict of rights. Thirdly, in order to avoid the difference between the first invention system and the first application system between the two countries, the valid filing date of the United States presumption invention date is corresponding to the Chinese application date, assuming that there is no other evidence to disprove the presumption invention date. Thus, the difference between the two countries' system of preventing the conflict of rights is obtained. Finally, in the light of the above-mentioned differences and in the light of the existing system of preventing conflicts of rights in our country, the specific measures and recommendations for the system of preventing conflict of rights are given from both the procedural and the substantive aspects of the review, It mainly improves the procedural provisions in terms of time limit and process by means of clarification and interpretation, and unifies them with the subsequent judicial procedures by upgrading the substantive provisions that conflict with the standards of review of applications and repeated authorizations, and supplemented by supporting measures. The above specific measures and suggestions will help to gradually improve the distinction between patent rights, reduce the size of the patent family, avoid excessive patent rights, and effectively prevent conflicts between exclusive rights, To some extent, to avoid the unfair extension of patent protection period and abuse of patent rights, to give play to the incentive role of the patent system, has a certain degree of practical operation and theoretical foresight.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D923.42;D971.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 彭玉勇;葉s，

本文編號(hào)：2141430