【摘要】： 本文主要是在思想史的脈絡(luò)中,從知識(shí)傳統(tǒng)的斷裂入手,考察法律現(xiàn)代性作為一種有別于傳統(tǒng)知識(shí)的知識(shí)形態(tài)是如何自我確證、自我展現(xiàn)并呈現(xiàn)出其對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)的批判力的。筆者探討了法律現(xiàn)代性問(wèn)題域中的一個(gè)重要問(wèn)題,即現(xiàn)代法律主體與現(xiàn)代法律文本之間的理性互動(dòng),通過(guò)對(duì)現(xiàn)代法律文本的建構(gòu)過(guò)程和現(xiàn)代法律主體自我身份型塑過(guò)程的考察,筆者發(fā)現(xiàn)“理性”是貫穿現(xiàn)代法律始終的核心價(jià)值要素�！袄硇浴辈坏�(gòu)了現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的支配性價(jià)值原則即“主體性”原則,還成為現(xiàn)代形式法范式的靈魂所在。通過(guò)考察自宗教改革以來(lái)現(xiàn)代知識(shí)形態(tài)、政治哲學(xué)和法律的發(fā)展過(guò)程,我們可以看到一幅形式理性改造世界的世俗化的社會(huì)圖景。當(dāng)筆者回顧了作為現(xiàn)代法律價(jià)值基礎(chǔ)的“理性”與“自由”是如何從抽象的理念現(xiàn)實(shí)化為具體的制度形態(tài)時(shí),也同時(shí)體會(huì)到了“理性化”的法律是如何同“合理化”的社會(huì)生活展開(kāi)互動(dòng)的�，F(xiàn)代形式化的法律與日益理性化的社會(huì)生活之間的反復(fù)磨合和互動(dòng),為我們展現(xiàn)了法律現(xiàn)代化的歷史過(guò)程。任何一種理論形態(tài)在發(fā)展到高度成熟的時(shí)候都會(huì)暴露出這樣那樣的問(wèn)題,作為法律現(xiàn)代性重要表現(xiàn)形態(tài)的現(xiàn)代法治在“工具理性”不斷擴(kuò)張的社會(huì)背景下,逐漸浮現(xiàn)出各種各樣的內(nèi)在矛盾和沖突。理性的展現(xiàn)不斷地壓縮社會(huì)主體個(gè)人自由的空間,合理化的過(guò)程使形式合理性壓制實(shí)質(zhì)合理性,導(dǎo)致價(jià)值和規(guī)范無(wú)法通過(guò)獲得理性證明而存在,現(xiàn)代法律正當(dāng)性的根據(jù)也因?yàn)槔硇缘膬?nèi)在缺陷而變得可疑了。為了重新塑造現(xiàn)代政治和法律的規(guī)范性基礎(chǔ),對(duì)現(xiàn)有的理性模式進(jìn)行批判并尋找替代性的理性模式就成為一種必然的選擇了。哈貝馬斯用“主體間性”的“溝通理性”替代了日益“工具化”的“主體理性”,為現(xiàn)代性的法律提供了一種新的規(guī)范性基礎(chǔ),也為現(xiàn)代法律的發(fā)展提供了一條新的路徑。
[Abstract]:In the context of the history of thought, this paper examines how legal modernity, as a form of knowledge different from traditional knowledge, confirms itself, reveals itself and presents its critical power to reality from the breakage of knowledge tradition. The author probes into an important problem in the field of legal modernity, that is, the rational interaction between the modern legal subject and the modern legal text, through the investigation of the construction process of the modern legal text and the self-identity molding process of the modern legal subject. The author finds that rationality is the core value of modern law. Rationality not only constructs the dominant value principle of modern society, that is, the principle of subjectivity, but also becomes the soul of the paradigm of modern formal law. By examining the development process of modern knowledge form, political philosophy and law since the religious reform, we can see a secularized social picture of the transformation of the world with formal rationality. When the author reviews how "rationality" and "freedom", as the foundation of modern legal value, are transformed from abstract ideas into concrete institutional forms, At the same time, I realized how the rational law interacts with the rational social life. The repeated run-in and interaction between the modern formalized law and the increasingly rational social life show us the historical process of legal modernization. Any kind of theoretical form will expose some problems when it develops to a high degree of maturity. The modern rule of law, as an important manifestation of legal modernity, is under the social background of "instrumental rationality" expanding constantly. A variety of internal contradictions and conflicts emerge gradually. The rational display constantly compresses the space of the individual freedom of the social subject, the rationalization process causes the form rationality to suppress the substantive rationality, causes the value and the norm to be unable to obtain the rational proof and exists, The basis of the legitimacy of modern law has become doubtful because of the inherent defects of reason. In order to remodel the normative foundation of modern politics and law, it is an inevitable choice to criticize the existing rational model and find alternative rational model. Habermas has replaced the increasingly "instrumental" subjective rationality "with the" inter-subjectivity "communication rationality", which provides a new normative basis for modern law and a new path for the development of modern law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D90

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 喻中;;法的現(xiàn)代性:一個(gè)虛構(gòu)的理論神話[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2013年05期

2 唐豐鶴;;現(xiàn)代性之下的正當(dāng)性——基于韋伯的研究[J];理論月刊;2011年09期

，

本文編號(hào)：2134625