中國(guó)古代判例特征及其功能分析
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-07-03 04:25
本文選題:古代判例 + 成文法; 參考:《煙臺(tái)大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文
【摘要】: 判例在中國(guó)古代有著悠久的傳統(tǒng),是中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律中一種重要的法律形式,它以其自身靈活、適時(shí)、直觀等成文法所不具備的優(yōu)點(diǎn)在歷代司法實(shí)踐中起著補(bǔ)充、變通、發(fā)展和完善律的作用。我們應(yīng)當(dāng)認(rèn)真對(duì)待判例這一寶貴文化遺產(chǎn),充分挖掘其中的有益內(nèi)容,自覺摒棄其中的負(fù)面因素,在此基礎(chǔ)上,理性構(gòu)建當(dāng)今中國(guó)的法律體系。本文從厘清中國(guó)古代判例的發(fā)展脈絡(luò)入手,分析判例的特征、成因、功能,總結(jié)古代判例給我們的啟示。 文章主要分四個(gè)部分進(jìn)行研究。 第一章追尋了中國(guó)古代判例制度的歷史。中國(guó)古代比較重視成文法的制定工作,逐步形成了以法典為核心的法律體系。同時(shí)各朝又創(chuàng)造了例等法律形式作為制定法的補(bǔ)充。本章先后從先秦時(shí)期、秦漢時(shí)期、隋唐時(shí)期、宋元時(shí)期、明清時(shí)期五個(gè)階段理清古代判例的歷史沿革。 第二章論述中國(guó)古代判例的特征及成因。主要分為三個(gè)部分,分別論述了皇權(quán)是我國(guó)古代判例效力之源,禮制是古代判例制度之魂,指出判例在古代法中的地位,即以律為依據(jù)和前提,對(duì)制定法起輔助和補(bǔ)充作用。 第三章論述中國(guó)古代判例的功能。判例的政治功能主要是對(duì)封建專制統(tǒng)治的維護(hù)、對(duì)封建法制原則的維護(hù)和對(duì)封建禮制價(jià)值的維護(hù);法律功能則體現(xiàn)在闡述法律精神,改造成文法和補(bǔ)成文法之不足。 第四章討論我國(guó)古代判例制度的啟示。立足我國(guó)古代判例的本土資源,總結(jié)經(jīng)驗(yàn),為我國(guó)當(dāng)代判例制度的建設(shè)提供反思和借鑒。 本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于利用歷史分析法、比較研究法、文化研究法將我國(guó)不同歷史階段的判例進(jìn)行比較,并運(yùn)用大量古代判例進(jìn)行觀點(diǎn)論證,以古鑒今,為當(dāng)下法治建設(shè)提供傳統(tǒng)資源的支持。
[Abstract]:Case law has a long tradition in ancient China, and it is an important legal form in Chinese traditional law. It has the advantages of flexibility, timeliness, intuitionistic and so on. It is complementary and flexible in the judicial practice of the past dynasties. The function of developing and perfecting the law. We should take the valuable cultural heritage of precedent seriously, fully excavate its beneficial contents, consciously abandon the negative factors, and on this basis, rationally construct the legal system of China today. This paper analyzes the characteristics, causes and functions of Chinese ancient cases, and summarizes the enlightenment of ancient cases. The article is divided into four parts. The first chapter traces the history of Chinese ancient precedent system. In ancient China, more attention was paid to the enactment of statute law, which gradually formed the legal system with the code as the core. At the same time, each dynasty also created examples and other forms of law as a complement to the law. This chapter clarifies the historical evolution of ancient precedents from five periods: pre-Qin, Qin and Han dynasties, Sui and Tang dynasties, Song and Yuan dynasties, and Ming and Qing dynasties. The second chapter discusses the characteristics and causes of ancient Chinese jurisprudence. It is mainly divided into three parts, which respectively discuss that imperial power is the source of the validity of the ancient case law in our country, and the etiquette system is the soul of the ancient precedent system, and points out the position of the case law in ancient law, that is, taking the law as the basis and premise, it plays an auxiliary and supplementary role in the formulation of the law. The third chapter discusses the function of ancient Chinese jurisprudence. The political function of case law is mainly to maintain the feudal autocratic rule, the principle of feudal legal system and the value of feudal ritual system, while the legal function is to expound the spirit of law, to reform the statutory law and to supplement the deficiency of written law. The fourth chapter discusses the enlightenment of the ancient case system of our country. Based on the local resources of our country's ancient precedents and summing up our experience, we can provide reflection and reference for the construction of our country's contemporary precedent system. The innovation of this paper lies in the use of historical analysis, comparative research and cultural research to compare the precedents in different historical stages of our country, and to use a large number of ancient cases to demonstrate the point of view in order to learn from the past and the present. To provide the support of traditional resources for the construction of the current rule of law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:煙臺(tái)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2009
【分類號(hào)】:D929
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 鄭賓楠;判例在中國(guó)的法源地位研究[D];山東大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號(hào):2092388
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2092388.html
最近更新
教材專著