本文選題：《周易》古經(jīng) + 《易傳》　； 參考：《山東大學》2013年博士論文

【摘要】：《周易》是中國文化的源頭活水,包括《經(jīng)》和《傳》兩部分。整個中國文化的基本觀念和基本精神都能從《周易》古經(jīng)及《易傳》中找到根源,其中就包括法律文化。《易傳》是對《周易》古經(jīng)最古的闡釋,同時又是一部在文獻、歷史、哲學等方面均產(chǎn)生廣泛影響的著作,歷來為學人所關注。《易傳》以解經(jīng)的方式闡述其法哲學思想,實現(xiàn)了對古經(jīng)法哲學思想的繼承和超越,其易學思維方式是法哲學思想的依據(jù)。《易傳》通過對古經(jīng)的闡釋,除去卜筮之意,創(chuàng)造性地構建了自成體系的儒家人生觀和世界觀,并且把兩者統(tǒng)一于天人合一的有機整體中。《易傳》法哲學思想在形成過程中,與各家法哲學思想產(chǎn)生了融合,因此具有兼容并蓄的特質,對后世產(chǎn)生了深遠的影響,它是先人智慧的結晶,也是今天進行法律思想史研究的重要史料。 本文選取《易傳》法哲學思想為研究對象,分別從《易傳》法哲學思想產(chǎn)生的淵源、主要內容、與先秦各家法哲學思想的關系、主要特點以及對后世的影響等方面進行了論述,本文主要分為五個部分： 第一章分析《易傳》法哲學思想產(chǎn)生的淵源。本文將《易傳》法哲學思想產(chǎn)生的淵源定位于兩個方面,一是《周易》古經(jīng)法哲學思想,一是春秋戰(zhàn)國時期各家法哲學思想。《易傳》是對《周易》古經(jīng)最古的闡釋,《周易》古經(jīng)的法哲學思想是《易傳》法哲學思想的重要淵源,《易傳》通過對古經(jīng)的闡釋,繼承、發(fā)展和豐富了古經(jīng)的法哲學思想。本文對古經(jīng)法哲學思想進行了整理和發(fā)掘,為《易傳》法哲學思想闡述奠定了基礎。《易傳》誕生于百家爭鳴的時代。春秋時期法律革新思想的出現(xiàn)和戰(zhàn)國各家法哲學思想都是《易傳》法哲學思想產(chǎn)生的重要淵源。本文通過分析《易傳》的成書、學術思想的歸屬,說明“經(jīng)”到“傳”的關系,論證了《易傳》不但凝結了儒家的智慧,也吸取了道家、法家、墨家等各家思想的精華。 第二章論述《易傳》法哲學思想的主要內容。在前人研究的基礎上,對《易傳》所包含的法哲學思想進行了系統(tǒng)的總結和歸納�！兑讉鳌返某蓵�(jīng)歷了一個長期的過程,它所蘊含的法哲學思想也必定呈現(xiàn)出不斷完善、與時俱進的發(fā)展過程。“十翼”各篇各具特色,因此《易傳》的法哲學思想內容豐富,且文字流暢,表述清晰。筆者將《易傳》法哲學思想的主要內容歸納為明慎用刑、寬柔相濟,崇德重民、禮法結合,和諧中正、無訟息訟三個篇節(jié),每一節(jié)又論述了這些法哲學思想所包含的具體內容。 第三章主要論述《易傳》法哲學思想與先秦各家法哲學思想的關系�！兑讉鳌冯m然是儒家的典籍,但《易傳》絕沒有拘泥于儒家的視野,因為所處時代的優(yōu)勢,《易傳》得以兼容了多家思想,吸收各家思想之所長,形成一個兼容并蓄的龐大體系。作為儒家經(jīng)典,《易傳》法哲學思想與先秦儒家法哲學思想是相互交融的,而對道家、法家、墨家等各家思想則是采取了吸納和揚棄的態(tài)度。通過本章的論述,可以較為清晰的了解《易傳》與各家思想之間的關系,這不但能夠佐證先秦各家法哲學思想是《易傳》法哲學思想的重要淵源,而且可以深刻的理解《易傳》法哲學思想兼容并包的特質。 第四章主要論述了《易傳》法哲學思想的特色。本章分為三部分內容,一是論述了《易傳》以解經(jīng)的方式闡述其法哲學思想；二是論述了“天人合一”是《易傳》法哲學思想的哲學基礎。三是論述了“崇德重民”是《易傳》法哲學思想的價值追求。本章是對《易傳》法哲學思想的總結,展現(xiàn)出《易傳》法哲學思想成熟發(fā)展的一面,也展現(xiàn)出它對于統(tǒng)治階級和社會發(fā)展的重要價值。 第五章主要論述《易傳》法哲學思想對后世的影響�！兑讉鳌烦蓵�,中國社會步入了“大一統(tǒng)”的時代。因此,本文論述了《易傳》法哲學思想對封建社會的影響和對現(xiàn)代法治建設的啟示兩部分內容。本章落腳于選題之意義所在,以古論今,通過論述《易傳》法哲學思想幾千年來的深遠影響,來尋求《易傳》法哲學思想對現(xiàn)代法治建設的重要啟示和意義,也是對全文內容的總結和歸納。 本文的創(chuàng)新之處： (一)在“經(jīng)”與“傳”分離的基礎上論述《易傳》的法哲學思想,厘清《周易》古經(jīng)法哲學思想和《易傳》法哲學思想,學術界現(xiàn)有的對《周易》法哲學思想的研究,一般都沒有區(qū)分經(jīng)傳,而是將兩者混合在一起進行分析。筆者認為,《周易》古經(jīng)和《易傳》產(chǎn)生的歷史背景不同,因為不同的政治、社會、經(jīng)濟背景,兩者所反映的法哲學思想必然有較大的差異。本文選題為《易傳》法哲學思想研究,就是建立在這個基礎之上。 (二)在論述《周易》古經(jīng)法哲學思想和《易傳》法哲學思想關系的基礎上,分析了《易傳》法哲學思想對《周易》古經(jīng)法哲學思想的繼承和超越。指出《易傳》法哲學思想之所以能實現(xiàn)對古經(jīng)的超越,則在于《易傳》對各家思想的吸納和揚棄,展現(xiàn)出《易傳》法哲學思想兼容并蓄的思想特質。 (三)分析了《周易》古經(jīng)法哲學思想和《易傳》法哲學思想與儒家法哲學思想之間的相互交融,指出了《周易》古經(jīng)—《易傳》、《周易》古經(jīng)——儒家法哲學思想、儒家法哲學思想——《易傳》之間的關系。同時論證了正是因為這樣的相互交融,才使得儒家法哲學思想能夠在激烈的交鋒中長期占據(jù)著封建主流法律思想的地位,也使得《易傳》法哲學思想借儒家思想的發(fā)展而得以傳承并對后世產(chǎn)生深遠的影響。 本文的不足之處： (一)因為《周易》經(jīng)傳所蘊含內容的博大精深,對其法哲學思想未能進行更為全面的整理和發(fā)掘,必定出現(xiàn)了許多遺漏之處。特別是對《周易》古經(jīng)法哲學思想的論述,因為所學有限,對現(xiàn)有史料的掌握和理解尚有不足,因此未能挖掘出更多且有價值的法哲學思想,必定影響到了對《易傳》法哲學研究的深度和廣度。 (二)在文章的寫作過程中,存在著對史料理解不夠準確、運用不甚恰當?shù)默F(xiàn)象。在許多觀點的論證上,不夠嚴密,有牽強之嫌,有待于在以后的研究中進一步考量和修正。 (三)文章中某些章節(jié)的安排還存有不甚妥當之處,個別章節(jié)在前后順序上似乎不夠通順。論述的內容及引用的資料都存在重復現(xiàn)象,還需進一步完善和提高。
[Abstract]:"Zhouyi" is the source of Chinese culture, including the two parts of the Chinese culture. The basic concepts and basic spirit of the whole Chinese culture can be found from the "Zhouyi", the ancient classics and the "Yi Zhuan >", including the legal culture. The Yi Zhuan is the most ancient interpretation of the Zhouyi ancient classics, and it is also a part of the literature, history and philosophy. The works of extensive influence have always been paid attention to by the scholars. The Yi Zhuan explained his philosophical thought in the way of interpreting it, realized the inheritance and Transcendence of the philosophical thought of the ancient Scripture law. The way of thinking is the basis for the philosophy of law. The Yi Zhuan has created a self established Confucian life creatively by removing the meaning of divination through the interpretation of the ancient classics. View and world view, and unify the two in the organic whole of the unity of heaven and man. In the course of formation, the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >" has merged with the philosophy of every family. Therefore, it has an inclusive characteristic and has a profound influence on the later generations. It is the junctions of the wisdom of the ancestors and the importance of the study of the history of legal thought today. Historical materials.
This article selects the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >" as the research object, and discusses the origin, main content, the relationship with the philosophy of each family law in the pre Qin period, the main characteristics and the influence on the later generations, respectively. This article is divided into five parts:
The first chapter analyzes the origin of the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan > philosophy of law". The origin of the "Yi Zhuan > philosophical thought" is located in two aspects. One is the philosophical thought of the ancient classics, the first is the philosophical thought of the family law in the spring and Autumn period and the Warring States period. The important origin of learning thought, "Yi Zhuan >" through the interpretation of the ancient Scripture, inherited, developed and enriched the philosophical thought of the ancient classics. This article has arranged and excavated the philosophical thought of the ancient Scripture law, and laid the foundation for the exposition of the philosophical thought of the "Yi Zhuan >". The family law philosophy is the important origin of the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >". Through the analysis of the book of Yi Zhuan and the attribution of the academic thought, the article illustrates the relationship between "Jing" and "biography". It demonstrates that the Yi Zhuan not only condenses the wisdom of Confucianism, but also absorbs the essence of Taoist, Legalist and Mohist thoughts.
The second chapter discusses the main contents of the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >". On the basis of the previous studies, the author systematically summarizes and sums up the philosophical thought contained in the Yi Zhuan. The book of Yi Zhuan has undergone a long process, and the philosophical thought contained in it must also present a continuous improvement and the development process of the times. "Ten The main contents of the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >" are rich in law and philosophy, and the main contents of the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >" are summed up in three sections, namely, prudent punishment, leniency, virtue and people, the combination of the law of rites, the harmony in the middle of the law, and the non litigation. Specific content.
The third chapter mainly discusses the relationship between the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >" and the philosophy thought of the family law in the pre Qin period. Although the Yi Zhuan is a Confucian classics, the Yi Zhuan is never confined to the Confucian view. Because of the advantages of the times, the Yi Zhuan is compatible with many ideas and absorbs the director of all ideas to form a large and extensive system. For the Confucian classics, the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >" and the pre Qin Confucian philosophy of law and philosophy are mutually blending, while the ideas of Taoist, Legalist and Mohism have taken the attitude of absorbing and sublation. Through the discussion of this chapter, we can clearly understand the relationship between the "Yi Zhuan >" and the ideas of each family, which can not only prove the family law philosophy of the pre Qin period. Thought is an important source of the philosophy of Yi Zhuan, and it can profoundly understand the characteristics of the philosophy of Yi Zhuan.
The fourth chapter mainly discusses the characteristics of the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >". This chapter is divided into three parts. First, it expounds the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >" in the way of interpreting it, and two is the philosophical foundation of "the harmony between heaven and man" is the philosophical basis of the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >", and three is the value pursuit of "the worship of virtue and the people" is the value pursuit of the philosophical thought of the "Yi Zhuan >". This chapter is a summary of the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >", showing the mature development of the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >" and its important value for the development of the ruling class and the society.
The fifth chapter mainly discusses the influence of the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >" on the future generations. After the book of "Yi Zhuan >", Chinese society entered the era of "great unification". Therefore, this article expounds the two parts of the influence of the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >" to the feudal society and the enlightenment to the construction of the modern rule of law. By discussing the profound influence of the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >" on the philosophy of law for thousands of years, it seeks the important enlightenment and significance of the Yi Zhuan philosophy thought to the construction of modern rule of law, as well as the summary and induction of the full text.
The innovation of this article:
(1) on the basis of the separation of "Meridian" and "biography", the author discusses the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >", and clarifies the philosophical thought of "Zhouyi > ancient classics" and the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >". The historical background of the Yi Zhuan is different. Because of the different political, social and economic background, there must be a great difference in the legal philosophy reflected by the two. This paper is based on the study of the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >".
(two) on the basis of discussing the philosophical thought of "Zhou Yi", the philosophical thought of the ancient classics and the relationship between the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan >" and the philosophical thought of the law, this paper analyzes the inheritance and Transcendence of the philosophical thought of "Yi Zhuan > philosophy of law" to the philosophical thought of the ancient classics. Yi Zhuan > the ideological characteristic of the philosophical thought of the law.
(three) to analyze the mutual blending between the philosophical thought of "Zhouyi", the philosophical thought of the ancient classics and the philosophical and philosophical thoughts of the "Yi Zhuan >" and the Confucian law and philosophy, and point out the relationship between the Confucian philosophical thought of the Confucian law and philosophy and the Confucian legal philosophy, the relationship between the Confucian law and philosophy, and the relationship between the Confucian law and philosophy, and the relationship between the Confucian law and philosophy. The Confucian law and philosophy thought could occupy the position of the feudal mainstream legal thought for a long time in the fierce confrontation, and also made the "Yi Zhuan" the philosophy of law inherit and have a profound influence on the later generations by the development of the Confucian thought.
The shortcomings of this article are as follows:
(1) because of the profound and profound content contained in the book of Zhouyi, there must be a lot of omissions in the failure to make a more comprehensive arrangement and excavation of its legal philosophy, especially the discussion of the philosophical thought of the ancient classics, because of its limited learning and lack of understanding and understanding of the existing historical materials, so we can not excavate more. The valuable legal philosophy must have influenced the depth and breadth of the study of philosophy of Yi Zhuan.
(two) in the writing process of the article, there is a phenomenon that the understanding of the historical material is not accurate enough and the application is not very appropriate. In the argument of many viewpoints, it is not strict enough and has a far fetched suspicion. It needs to be further examined and amended in the future research.
(three) the arrangement of some chapters in the article is not quite appropriate, and the sequence of the individual chapters seems not to be smooth enough. The contents of the discussion and the reference materials have repeated phenomena, which need to be further improved and improved.
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D90;B221

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 張家國,李紅衛(wèi);《周易》古經(jīng)之刑罰內容述論[J];黃岡師專學報;1997年02期

2 殷雅輝,張文郁;《周易》法治思想探析[J];河北職業(yè)技術學院學報;2003年01期

3 趙建功;先秦儒家易學略論[J];華中科技大學學報(人文社會科學版);2002年06期

4 趙運鋒;儒家法律思想與現(xiàn)代法律思想的共鳴[J];焦作工學院學報(社會科學版);2004年01期

5 廖名春;試論孔子易學觀的轉變[J];孔子研究;1995年04期

6 崔永東;帛書《易經(jīng)》與西周法制[J];孔子研究;2001年05期

7 張晉藩;;中華法系特點探源[J];法學研究;1980年04期

8 李寶玉;;《易經(jīng)》陰陽和諧思想及其評價[J];求索;2008年06期

9 譚德貴;《周易》中的法律思想及其影響[J];法學論壇;2003年04期

10 顏炳罡;論孔子的仁禮合一說[J];山東大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2001年02期

相關博士學位論文 前2條

1 王忠春;清代無訟思想研究[D];南開大學;2010年

2 陳冬;先秦儒法思想繼承改造考[D];華東師范大學;2010年

，

本文編號：1978658