本文選題：獄訟 + 出土法律文獻(xiàn)��； 參考：《北方法學(xué)》2013年04期

【摘要】：《周禮》鄭玄注云"獄"、"訟"分別指稱"爭罪"和"爭財",但從出土法律文獻(xiàn)視角通貫考察"獄"、"訟"二詞在法律用語層面的語用,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)先秦時期的"獄"、"訟"二詞并沒有用于區(qū)分"爭罪"和"爭財",在法律用語層面上官府審案多稱"獄",民間訴爭則曰"訟",都是指稱"案件"。鄭玄注實是漢人以"漢今"律"周古"而得出的結(jié)論,以鄭玄注為據(jù)而斷定西周時的訴訟程序即刑民有分,于史實無證。
[Abstract]:"Zhou Li" Zheng Xuan annotates "prison", "lawsuit" refers to "fight for crime" and "fight for money" respectively, but from the angle of unearthed legal literature, it makes an investigation of the pragmatics of the words "prison" and "lawsuit" at the level of legal terms. It can be found that in the pre-Qin period "prison" and "lawsuit" were not used to distinguish between "fighting for crime" and "fighting for money". In terms of legal terms, the court case was often called "prison" by the government, and the civil lawsuit was called "lawsuit", both referring to "case". Zheng Xuanshi was the conclusion of Han people based on the law of Han Dynasty and the ancient times of Zhou Dynasty. According to Zheng Xuan's annotations, it was concluded that the criminal procedure in the Western Zhou Dynasty was divided into criminal cases and had no evidence in history.
【作者單位】： 華東政法大學(xué)法律古籍整理研究所;
【基金】：國家社科基金重大項目“法律文明史”(項目編號11&ZD081)的前期成果之一 上海市人文社科基地華東政法大學(xué)外國法與比較法研究院項目(基地編號SJ0709) 國家重點學(xué)科華東政法大學(xué)法律史學(xué)科建設(shè)項目(學(xué)科代碼030102)的資助
【分類號】：D909.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 杜金;;南宋地方司法訴訟的動態(tài)圖景——劉馨s睹骶蹈咝纖蝸匱玫撓稀范梁骩J];中西法律傳統(tǒng);2008年00期

2 溫慧輝;;“命夫、命婦不躬坐獄訟”辯析[J];法學(xué)評論;2006年03期

3 明輝;;棠下決獄:中國古代司法之韻[J];政府法制;2008年23期

4 劉馨s，

本文編號：1974333